kerouac9 said:
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'd be the first to say that there were a lot--a lot--of people saying that we should draft Big Ben Roethlisberger. But I'm still pretty sure that it wasn't "most of the board" which was John's claim. A lot of people (like Ed) were pimping Fitz, and the Texas homers were pimping Roy Williams, and I even think that there were people who wanted us to draft Will Smith. I was one of the people that was hoping for a trade-down to take Vince Wilfork at some point.
.
Speaking of Wilfork, I caught myself last night wondering what if we'd made the deal with Jax for their first rounder and at least 1 if not both of their 2nd rounders? they wanted a WR, Roy Williams or Fitz. Just conservatively say you get one 2nd rounder, the 39th pick, and their first.
You take Wilfork at 9, Dansby and 33, Tatum Bell, Darius Watts, Jake Grove or Keary Colbert at 39. Dockett in round 3.
We'd have a defense that had Wilfork AND Dockett together, and either a breakaway RB threat in Bell, or a young speedy WR(Watts) a highly productive WR(Colbert) or a rookie C with much more upside than Step.
Still wouldn't have had the QB, wouldn't have Fitz, but imagine our run defense with Wilfork? And at least one published report said Jax was offering BOTH picks to get up for Roy or Fitz 2nd pick was 55, Colbert was still on the board. So you could have got Bell and Colbert.
And yes this is total 20/20 hindsight on which guys to take but I'm pretty sure K9 was talking trade down with Bell specifically on his list of guys to get.
Fitz is going to be a really good player if we find a QB who can throw him the ball, I'm hoping King is that guy.