Panthers at Cardinals gameday thread 9-14-2025

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
17,088
Reaction score
18,858
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Your agenda is clouding your reading. Seriously, I think you THINK you are reading this, but you aren't. He is getting some blame, and rightly so. NOBODY is saying HE is to blame for the close game. Nobody. Quote one person saying he is the sole reason. I'll wait.
Come on Stout. Nobody can even criticize Kyler’s outfit when he’s entering the stadium without somebody getting butt hurt.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
22,273
Reaction score
22,179
Location
Modesto, California
It's not faith, it's understanding that he is not getting opportunities.

Here is where MHJ ranks.

55th in the NFL in targets.

51st in the NFL in yards per target.

62nd in the NFL in receptions.

34th in the NFL in yards per reception.

61st in average depth of target.

Consider this. Kyler has attempted three passes deep to MHJ. One was a 45 yard completion vs the Saints. One was almost a huge play vs the Saints. The third was a 38 yards pass interference. Those aren't outcomes of a bad or mid WR. Only an incompetent OC like Petzing wouldn't' emphasize this more.
Right...that's a 66% success rate no matter how you slice it.
PI doesn't go on a guys status sheet but a WR that can draw them regularly has a lot of value.
And let's be honest...most of the really deep passes in the NFL are gaming towards the penalty more than the catch..... penalty stops the clock.
I just know we need to take more deep shots...6 or 8 a game...make some plays..draw some flags...keep the defense honest
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
22,273
Reaction score
22,179
Location
Modesto, California
It's not faith, it's understanding that he is not getting opportunities.

Here is where MHJ ranks.

55th in the NFL in targets.

51st in the NFL in yards per target.

62nd in the NFL in receptions.

34th in the NFL in yards per reception.

61st in average depth of target.

Consider this. Kyler has attempted three passes deep to MHJ. One was a 45 yard completion vs the Saints. One was almost a huge play vs the Saints. The third was a 38 yards pass interference. Those aren't outcomes of a bad or mid WR. Only an incompetent OC like Petzing wouldn't' emphasize this more.
Right...that's a 66% success rate no matter how you slice it.
PI doesn't go on a guys status sheet but a WR that can draw them regularly has a lot of value.
And let's be honest...most of the really deep passes in the NFL are gaming towards the penalty more than the catch..... penalty stops the clock.
I just know we need to take more deep shots...6 or 8 a game...make some plays..draw some flags...keep the defense honest
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
1,912
Reaction score
4,103
Location
VA
It's not faith, it's understanding that he is not getting opportunities.

Here is where MHJ ranks.

55th in the NFL in targets.

51st in the NFL in yards per target.


Consider this. Kyler has attempted three passes deep to MHJ. One was a 45 yard completion vs the Saints. One was almost a huge play vs the Saints. The third was a 38 yards pass interference. Those aren't outcomes of a bad or mid WR. Only an incompetent OC like Petzing wouldn't' emphasize this more.
These are two stats that are supposed to match up.

There are opportunity stats and there are efficiency stats. When an elite WR is being held back by a lack of targets, he will have bad opportunity stats and amazing efficiency stats. MHJ has good opportunity stats (targets, air yards, route participation) and mediocre/bad efficiency stats (yards per route run, catch rate, separation). Efficiency is how you're supposed to know a WR is good. Judging the player based on what he does with the targets he's given.

Elite WR1 like Nabers are super efficient and get a lot of targets. Low end WR1s, like Calvin Ridley, are not super efficient, but still can get okay counting stats through sheer volume. Often times low end WR1s are outscored by efficient WR2s. Right now MHJ is the WR2 in this offense. MHJ has a 20% target share, while McBride has a 29% target share. That is normal considering MHJs career yards per route run is 1.61 , while post breakout McBride's is 2.42. It is also an extremely high target share for a WR2, we have a very concentrated offense. McBride is the more efficient receiver and deserves the higher target share.

Last year MHJ had the 23rd most targets in the league, but his yard per route run of 1.68 was 57th in the league. He was a super inefficient player, and if he wasnt a rookie the obvious conclusion would be to reduce his target share. Through his first 2 games this year these numbers havent really changed. Peppering an inefficient WR with targets doesnt make him more efficient, or lead to elite receiving numbers. It would just improve his reputation with the fantasy community (points per reception), while tanking our actual offense. If Marvin starts turning his opportunities (of which there are plenty) into actual yards I guarantee you his opportunities will increase. I'm just as eager for a true MHJ breakout as anyone else.

If you're curious, a real example of an elite WR being held back a lack of opportunity is AJ Brown. Last year Brown had the 39th most targets in the league (97) and 2nd best yards per route run (3.16).
 
Last edited:

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
24,900
Reaction score
46,645
Location
UK
Have you met Brit Card before?

There are plenty of others as well. If there weren't we wouldn't have a 200page plus thread on K1 and growing after 2 wins to open the season.

Perfectly reasonable to say that you can't judge the OC when his QB is clearly not capable of running and NFL offense.

It's like judging a chef when you give him some rancid beef to work with.

Maybe Petzing does suck, but impossible to know.
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
9,185
Reaction score
11,802
Location
Home of the Thunder
I just want to throw this out there about the CAR game..

Starting with the int, everything that could have possibly went wrong, went horribly, catastrophically wrong, and yet, we still won.

If this game would have happened in the 90s or the 00s'? Instead of winning, I guarantee you young would have thrown a TD pass with about 8 seconds left to seal the win for them. 100%. Beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Alls I'm saying is that, while we still suck as a franchise, we're not as bad as we used to be. Not quite. Anyway... just wanted to throw that out there.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
16,898
Reaction score
10,066
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
I need an appointment then please. I'm flying out on Saturday. Then we're driving to PHX for the Thursday night game. Then two weeks later we're heading to Indy for that game. So 0-3 is not of the question. :biglaugh:
Im close to being right. Not happy about it. All three were winnable games and here we are 0-2, and 7.5 dogs. Who had that on their bingo card?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
68,602
Reaction score
66,134
Location
SoCal
Back
Top