AZ Republic: Cards Shop With a Thin Wallet

Mrh182

Jai Guru Deva OM
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Posts
652
Reaction score
0
Location
Chandler, AZ
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/articles/0310cards0310.html

Structure of contracts leaves team just $7 mil under $109 mil salary cap

Kent Somers
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 10, 2007 12:00 AM
The Cardinals continued shopping in the free-agent market Friday, but dwindling salary-cap space means they won't leave with a full basket.

The Cardinals remain interested in offensive lineman Mike Gandy (Bills) and cornerbacks Roderick Hood (Eagles) and Travis Fisher (Rams). But the Cardinals are only $7 million under the $109 million salary cap, which means they likely have room for only another player or two in free agency.

The club has made two major deals in this free-agent period, and both contracts were designed to consume considerable cap space this year. The reason, team officials said, is they don't think there is a lot of talent in the free-agent market, and they didn't want to commit long-term cap space for marginally talented players. advertisement
You must be registered for see images
OAS_AD('ArticleFlex_1')
You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images


So the Cardinals have decided to take a heavy cap hit this season.

Safety Terrence Holt, who signed a five-year, $15 million deal Thursday, will have a cap figure of $4 million this year. If the team had structured his deal differently - giving $3.5 million as a signing bonus instead of a roster bonus - his cap figure would $2.7 million.

They did a similar deal with center Al Johnson, whose cap figure this year is $7 million. By giving him $3.5 million as a signing bonus instead of a roster bonus, the team could have lowered Johnson's cap number to $4.4 million.

Put the two deals together, and the Cardinals could have saved themselves almost $4 million of cap space this year.

Instead they are $7 million under the cap, and they're going to have to budget carefully throughout 2007. Here's why:

They have only 50 players under contract. When the season starts, 53 players will count against the cap. Those three extra players will use around $1 million of cap space.

Out of the remaining $6 million of cap space, the Cardinals must accommodate their rookie class, pay for a practice squad and injury replacements, as well as cover contract extensions of current players. So it's a good thing the Cardinals don't see much on the shelves of free agency, because they don't have much left to spend.
 

Shane

Current STAR
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
66,247
Reaction score
32,477
Location
Las Vegas
Translation there is we are done. Even I have to admit that they knew what they were doing when they did these deals this way. With the rookie figure being about 4 milllion and the 1 million or so cushion that hardly leaves any $ left.

They were simply blowing smoke up our butts when they stated that we would be aggressive in FA and sign 4 to 8 FA's. IMO We will sign one more at most. Making it 3 total FA's and it likely will be someone that isnt worth having IMO.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
60,373
Reaction score
23,035
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
They have only 50 players under contract. When the season starts, 53 players will count against the cap. Those three extra players will use around $1 million of cap space.

Another million less to work with ..

I'm thinking that that with Hood or Gandy they will have to sign them with a signing bonus ...
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
The team will state that we actually signed 4 guys so far. Thus the promise kept. Shipp, Millagen, Holt and Johnson. I see another two guys coming over here. Thee corner and the lineman. Then it's on to the fun part next month. If we play it smart we will come out of this years draft with 3-4 guys who will push starters.

A side note we may have to sign a number 3 QB unless Q is designated number 3 or the kid on the practice squad has what it takes. It wont be hard to find a guy who can play as well as Navarre.

GBR
40
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,939
Reaction score
5,089
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
The team will state that we actually signed 4 guys so far. Thus the promise kept. Shipp, Millagen, Holt and Johnson. I see another two guys coming over here. Thee corner and the lineman. Then it's on to the fun part next month. If we play it smart we will come out of this years draft with 3-4 guys who will push starters.

A side note we may have to sign a number 3 QB unless Q is designated number 3 or the kid on the practice squad has what it takes. It wont be hard to find a guy who can play as well as Navarre.
GBR
40

QB Shane Boyd is listed on the roster. I think we will draft a qb on day 2 or sign one of the undrafted qbs so we have some competition for #3 qb. One could also be put on the practice squad.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
11,969
Reaction score
4,859
Location
Nashville TN.
Bottom line is the free agency period thus far has not improved our team.

May feel differently after the draft but right now I don't.
 

BigRedArk

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 19, 2003
Posts
2,708
Reaction score
204
Location
Norh Little Rock, Arkansas
We should have signed Big to a long term contract at the same time we were extending Dockett and Hayes and then traded him after the season was over. That way we could've got something for him. We had the cap room to take the hit on his signing bonus. We could have at least gotten a draft pick for him or a LT. We now have a big hole at LT.

I hope Grimm can coach up Gorin, Wells, or Ross because one of those will probably be starting LT next year. One of them or a Rookie. If it's a Rookie he better learn fast.
 

Doc Cardinal

Old Fart
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Posts
1,807
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
Bottom line is the free agency period thus far has not improved our team.

May feel differently after the draft but right now I don't.

Is Holt better than Griffith or Francisco at FS?

Is Johnson as good or better than Leckey?

If you answer no then we signed two worthless players.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
11,969
Reaction score
4,859
Location
Nashville TN.
Is Holt better than Griffith or Francisco at FS?

Is Johnson as good or better than Leckey?

If you answer no then we signed two worthless players.


I believe Holt has a good chance of starting and Johnson is better than Step.

This is countered by losing our starting LT and to this point doing nothing to replace him.

This is why I don't believe free agency has improved our team.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Translation there is we are done. Even I have to admit that they knew what they were doing when they did these deals this way. With the rookie figure being about 4 milllion and the 1 million or so cushion that hardly leaves any $ left.

They were simply blowing smoke up our butts when they stated that we would be aggressive in FA and sign 4 to 8 FA's. IMO We will sign one more at most. Making it 3 total FA's and it likely will be someone that isnt worth having IMO.

I take your point, but this ignores the signing of (RFA) Leckey, (EFA) Smith and UFA's Shipp and Milligan. To which one adds Johnson and Holt.
 

Scott MS

Registered
Joined
Mar 8, 2004
Posts
4,144
Reaction score
15
Don't forget Shipp and Milligan count as free agent signings. The team has signed 4.
 

green machine

I rule at posting
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Posts
6,126
Reaction score
11
Location
Phoenix, AZ
We should have signed Big to a long term contract at the same time we were extending Dockett and Hayes and then traded him after the season was over. That way we could've got something for him. We had the cap room to take the hit on his signing bonus. We could have at least gotten a draft pick for him or a LT. We now have a big hole at LT.

I hope Grimm can coach up Gorin, Wells, or Ross because one of those will probably be starting LT next year. One of them or a Rookie. If it's a Rookie he better learn fast.

Yeah, because signing guys to a long term deal and then trading them the next season is quite common, especially with the way bounuses and stuff work.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
I truly hope we don't sign Mike Gandy at all. He isn't worth more than the veteran minimum with no signing bonus.

There isn't a single player out there worth a multi-year contract with bonus. If we are done with free agency, I'll be pleased. Losing Leonard Davis was the only negative but I'm not too displeased because I feared Leonard would just go into cruise control once he got his guaranteed money.
 
Top