TheCardFan
Things have changed.
Jury's out on Lawrence.
Remember when Lawrence was a "generational" prospect?
Jury's out on Lawrence.
Yea same TLaw hasnt really took that top 5 leap i thought he would by nowStafford's a good example to counter my thoughts. Jury's out on Lawrence. I expected much more from him and he's been pretty mid so far with decent talent around him the last two years.
I’m not sure he can learn that no matter hire many seasons. I don’t think Kyler wants to learn it at this point. Now, he gets rid of daddy and goes to a QB coach in the off-season maybe he can pick some stuff up and I would change my feelings on if Kyler even want to learn itKyler was brought up in a sandlot offense. He played against inferior talent a could get away with just about anything.
He now plays in a league where the tallest guy in college is now the shortest. The fastest guy in college is now the slowest.
This league is structured and designed. Call a play, read the defense and react accordingly. Play A is covered, go to option B. That’s covered to so go to option C.
It’s 1-2-3 and throw. It’s throw to this open area before your wr is there.
This ain’t Kyler and I’m not sure he can “learn” this in one off season.
People need to quit using the generational rating for prospects. It’s silly. Not saying you use it @TheCardFan just speaking generally.Remember when Lawrence was a "generational" prospect?
Yes, I can. Jackson has one playoff win and no Super Bowl ring. I am referring to a style of QB play, some better than most, but does not seem a consistent style for winning in the NFLMurray shouldn’t be mentioned in the same breath as Jackson.
Yea, the Starling over Clark one is so puzzling to me. The fact that Starling is also a rookie is driving me wild.
Thomas was moved almost immediately into heavy rotation in the defense:if you buy into the conspiracy, they know what they have with Clark (didn't he get ST snaps last week?).
Starling is a mixed bag and I suspect he will get the call to see how he handles the additional snaps and coaching - if they pull he or Hamilton for an even greener DB, that would lend some credibility to the conspiracy
You can but it’s breath wasted.Yes, I can. Jackson has one playoff win and no Super Bowl ring. I am referring to a style of QB play, some better than most, but does not seem a consistent style for winning in the NFL
Clark received no snaps at all last week. Yet he is on some posters list as having been coached up?if you buy into the conspiracy, they know what they have with Clark (didn't he get ST snaps last week?).
Starling is a mixed bag and I suspect he will get the call to see how he handles the additional snaps and coaching - if they pull he or Hamilton for an even greener DB, that would lend some credibility to the conspiracy
And yet KM still isn't even in the conversation with Jackson. That is how bad he has been in the clutch.Yes, I can. Jackson has one playoff win and no Super Bowl ring. I am referring to a style of QB play, some better than most, but does not seem a consistent style for winning in the NFL
Well, there is a comparison, just not a flattering one.You can but it’s breath wasted.
Jackson is on the cusp of taking his team to the playoffs for the 4th time in 6 years, has won an MVP and is in the running to win another.
Kyler has been to the playoffs once in 5 years, been a disaster in the playoffs and mediocre to bad for the last two seasons.
And Kyler doesn’t get near the same mileage out of his legs that Lamar does.
Thus, there’s no comparison.