The Case for Trading the Third Pick

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
69,799
Reaction score
68,371
Location
SoCal
I’m not advocating for taking a RT. It’s just that quite a few people who have solid history of predicting drafts are convinced that’s how the Cards will play it. If they went Edge, I’d be okay with your guy Bailey. I’m just hearing they think the pass rush was good enough with better coaching. They may not take an Edge at all, though they’re not opposed to a FA rusher, but not someone with a Sweat price tag. Whoever the new coach is the thinking seems to be Oline & WRs. Don’t be shocked if Murray is the QB. In the end I’ve run a few dozen scenarios with friends and a small move down likely still nets Mauigoa if they insist on a RT. Fano is more highly rated though it’s debated. I simply can’t see using a three on a RT. If they stay put I like Bailey. He’s the safest choice. Reese and Bain are major gambles, but they do have huge upsides. It’s a tough draft.
Listening to the talking heads on nfl radio - the draft “experts” as they’ve been watching the senior bowl practices, the keep stating that Bailey will begin as only a situational guy - and here’s the scary follow up comment I keep hearing - and that “it’s all he ever may be.” For the third pick? Yikes.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
9,679
Reaction score
6,554
Location
Iowa
Listening to the talking heads on nfl radio - the draft “experts” as they’ve been watching the senior bowl practices, the keep stating that Bailey will begin as only a situational guy - and here’s the scary follow up comment I keep hearing - and that “it’s all he ever may be.” For the third pick? Yikes.
And a right tackle plays every offensive down.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,135
Reaction score
13,579
Correct. And just as you state, we would have been WRONG. What the opposite of “wrong?” It’s right. What happened? The opposite of what you said could have happened. So what did that make us? It made us RIGHT.

The definition of for foresight:
Foresight is the ability to anticipate what’s coming and act wisely before it arrives.

we would have stood pat and taken Anderson. Pretty much sounds like “anticipating what’s coming and acting wisely before it arrives,” no?
How did you anticipate that Houston's pick would be 27th overall?
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,184
Reaction score
23,433
Location
Modesto, California
Nothing makes a professional cook happier than listening to a bunch of armchair quarterbacks use cooking analogies to make a point..
okay...

in "MY" cooking,...its all about the prep

But, I was taught by my dad...who was a professional cook....6 years of school...50 years in the kitchen. about a decade worth at MGM...
Pops was an individual..all that schooling,...amazing skill at preparing food...all so he could spend his life working at Diners, Casinos, truck stops, etc..
dude had a particular lifestyle and apparently these types of establishments were well populated with folks who shared the same lifestyle?? I dunno...
dude was a mediocre dad...but an awesome cook! LOL
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,184
Reaction score
23,433
Location
Modesto, California
Correct. And just as you state, we would have been WRONG. What the opposite of “wrong?” It’s right. What happened? The opposite of what you said could have happened. So what did that make us? It made us RIGHT.

The definition of for foresight:
Foresight is the ability to anticipate what’s coming and act wisely before it arrives.

we would have stood pat and taken Anderson. Pretty much sounds like “anticipating what’s coming and acting wisely before it arrives,” no?

fore·skin
[ˈfɔːskɪn]
noun
******** (noun)
foreskins (plural noun)
  1. the retractable roll of skin covering the end of the penis. Also called prepuce


equal relevance equal measure
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,600
Reaction score
3,225
Location
Charleston, SC
okay...

in "MY" cooking,...its all about the prep

But, I was taught by my dad...who was a professional cook....6 years of school...50 years in the kitchen. about a decade worth at MGM...
Pops was an individual..all that schooling,...amazing skill at preparing food...all so he could spend his life working at Diners, Casinos, truck stops, etc..
dude had a particular lifestyle and apparently these types of establishments were well populated with folks who shared the same lifestyle?? I dunno...
dude was a mediocre dad...but an awesome cook! LOL
Awesome cooks are, at best, mediocre dads. But we try our best.
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,044
Reaction score
36,931
Location
Orlando, FL
Listening to the talking heads on nfl radio - the draft “experts” as they’ve been watching the senior bowl practices, the keep stating that Bailey will begin as only a situational guy - and here’s the scary follow up comment I keep hearing - and that “it’s all he ever may be.” For the third pick? Yikes.
That concern has been raised. For most of his tenure he did not do a good job of setting the edge. However, his last half dozen games showed considerable improvement and better physicality. So the question is can the right HC/DC keep him engaged in that part of the job? If what your looking for is a pass rusher, he’s the surest thing in the draft. Again this comes back to the RT being the Cards’ focus and an increased possibility for picking up another pick for a short move down. The only question that concerns me is how far is it safe to drop?
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
32,808
Reaction score
54,516
Location
Colorado
Listening to the talking heads on nfl radio - the draft “experts” as they’ve been watching the senior bowl practices, the keep stating that Bailey will begin as only a situational guy - and here’s the scary follow up comment I keep hearing - and that “it’s all he ever may be.” For the third pick? Yikes.
They could have info that I don’t have but I have no clue where this is coming from.
 
Last edited:

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,175
Reaction score
18,556
Location
Chandler, Az
Best I can offer is more detail. Campbell will be pursued by the Cards and has not submitted retirement papers. The feeling about the coaching of Gannon/Rallis was that they simply weren’t aggressive with an attacking defense. They played not to lose. Certainly the loss of Nolen hurts, but he will return at some point in the season. In retrospect I should have been clearer that I wasn’t trying to say the pass rush was good, just that it could have been significantly better with more stunts, blitzes and not just 4 man rushes. With the Oline debacle the feeling is it had to be addressed first, especially with the QB starter up in the air. Nobody is expecting the pass rush to lead the league, but it could be better. The Oline situation is desperate

That's exactly what I have been saying. Going into this season I thought there was zero chance that Gannon wouldn't make it to year 4. Then his entire staff turtled and started to play not to lose and lost their edge. After watching that epic collapse I want an aggressive DC which has me leaning towards Weaver and his attacking defense that creates turnovers.
 

Syracusecards

DA's pass went that way
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Posts
4,674
Reaction score
5,239
oh my lord... because we didn't learn our lesson in 2023.

How about we actually have a GM who can take advantage of picking that high and actually get someone who can make a freaking impact?
I will never understand how people forget how Jimmy Johnson built the Dallas Cowboys into back-to-back Super Bowl teams. He traded down constantly and acquired picks.

we absolutely should have traded back instead of selecting Marvin Harrison. If you have a staff that can evaluate talent, you’re much more likely to get good players from 12 guys than seven.

if Houston sucked like we thought they were going to, we would’ve been in a great position for the draft. unfortunately, they didn’t.

I am hoping they trade back and keep trading back and just acquire a ton of future picks.

this is a rebuilding year. We have no hope so let’s get after the future.
 

Zalixar

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
4,297
Reaction score
6,893
Location
OC
I will never understand how people forget how Jimmy Johnson built the Dallas Cowboys into back-to-back Super Bowl teams. He traded down constantly and acquired picks.

we absolutely should have traded back instead of selecting Marvin Harrison. If you have a staff that can evaluate talent, you’re much more likely to get good players from 12 guys than seven.

if Houston sucked like we thought they were going to, we would’ve been in a great position for the draft. unfortunately, they didn’t.

I am hoping they trade back and keep trading back and just acquire a ton of future picks.

this is a rebuilding year. We have no hope so let’s get after the future.

Yeah, but that was on the back of the worst trade in the history of all trades, or best if you were the Cowboys.

There was lots of wheeling and dealing, as they ended up trading up for Smith with one of the Vikes picks. Fleeced the Saints with Walsh, and traded up to get Maryland in 91. Irvin was already on the roster before Jimmy got there.

They landed the picks in general, which is the main key.

The circumstances of that Cowboys run will never happen again.
 

Syracusecards

DA's pass went that way
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Posts
4,674
Reaction score
5,239
Yeah, but that was on the back of the worst trade in the history of all trades, or best if you were the Cowboys.

There was lots of wheeling and dealing, as they ended up trading up for Smith with one of the Vikes picks. Fleeced the Saints with Walsh, and traded up to get Maryland in 91. Irvin was already on the roster before Jimmy got there.

They landed the picks in general, which is the main key.

The circumstances of that Cowboys run will never happen again.
disagree. There is always an Owner out there that thinks they’re one draft pick away.
 

Zalixar

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
4,297
Reaction score
6,893
Location
OC
disagree. There is always an Owner out there that thinks they’re one draft pick away.

Nope, just won't happen. Teams aren't that dumb like they were before, especially because of this, Ricky Williams, etc. They can still be dumb, but nothing on the scale to compare to the Cowboys. Especially since your premise was trading down to acquire picks, when instead Cowboys were granted a ton of extra picks and traded UP to build their team

It also wasn't just "one player away." In addition to everything else, the Vikings also offered compensation for players that were not on the Cowboys roster. So they cut all players and received even more compensation.

No one will ever be as dumb as the Vikings
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,044
Reaction score
36,931
Location
Orlando, FL
I will never understand how people forget how Jimmy Johnson built the Dallas Cowboys into back-to-back Super Bowl teams. He traded down constantly and acquired picks.

we absolutely should have traded back instead of selecting Marvin Harrison. If you have a staff that can evaluate talent, you’re much more likely to get good players from 12 guys than seven.

if Houston sucked like we thought they were going to, we would’ve been in a great position for the draft. unfortunately, they didn’t.

I am hoping they trade back and keep trading back and just acquire a ton of future picks.

this is a rebuilding year. We have no hope so let’s get after the future.
Johnson’s big contribution was his trade chart, though crude, helped them make quicker decisions more confidently. It was a huge revelation.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
32,808
Reaction score
54,516
Location
Colorado
I will never understand how people forget how Jimmy Johnson built the Dallas Cowboys into back-to-back Super Bowl teams. He traded down constantly and acquired picks.

we absolutely should have traded back instead of selecting Marvin Harrison. If you have a staff that can evaluate talent, you’re much more likely to get good players from 12 guys than seven.

if Houston sucked like we thought they were going to, we would’ve been in a great position for the draft. unfortunately, they didn’t.

I am hoping they trade back and keep trading back and just acquire a ton of future picks.

this is a rebuilding year. We have no hope so let’s get after the future.
If you can get a Herschel Walker deal...sure...but I am not seeing one of those out there.

The other thing is that JJ made most of his success in the top 100 picks, Monti has not been able to replicate it despite having a bunch of picks in that area. Monti is no JJ.
 
Top