I'm better than Mulli!
- Sep 16, 2002
- Reaction score
Once we traded for Hollywood and drafted McBride (which was a surprise, but I like the move) they did close to what I wanted:Well...from what I've seen, most of the board is pretty damn positive about this draft overall.
None of the players drafted are bad players. Maybe fit and position can be argued, but I see a path going forward.
Back-to-back edge/DE or IOL in third (they could’ve done either and I would’ve been good) - so Thomas/sanders met that.
Flood the 6th and 7th with whatever we did NOT do in third (so edge/DE or IOL) - they did it to a lesser extent with taking two OGs.
Really unsure about the others drafted. The CB seems a good size/speed prospect, so why not roll the dice? The USC RB and PSU LB seem pretty pedestrian (and the RB seems to have similar running style of Conner).
But overall pleased with the shots we took. I’ll be ecstatic if we finally have a stud young TE. Been pining for that for decades.