No Elite Player/Players

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,508
Reaction score
16,801
Location
The Giant Toaster
thats his point is fitz was never top 5 in nfl, only at his position and you are saying top 5 nfl wide only.

I said top 5-10.

Thinking back to 08'...

(off the top of my head)
Manning, Brees
Peterson??
Fitz (his best regular season statistically and historic postseason)
Ware
J Harrison
Lewis??
Reed
Polamalu
Haynesworth??

I think it gets a little fuzzy when you include OL but I'm sure you could've thrown some in.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
37,149
Reaction score
27,044
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I said top 5-10.

Thinking back to 08'...

(off the top of my head)
Manning, Brees
Peterson??
Fitz (his best regular season statistically and historic postseason)
Ware
J Harrison
Lewis??
Reed
Polamalu
Haynesworth??

I think it gets a little fuzzy when you include OL but I'm sure you could've thrown some in.

Just '08, or are you talking about the five-year period. His best regular season wasn't even tops in the NFL at the position — Andre Johnson had over 100 more yards.

Similar production at more impact positions:
DeMarcus Ware, OLB
Jared Allen, DE
Adrian Peterson, RB
Drew Brees, QB
Peyton Manning, QB

Similar protection at similar impact positions:
Andre Johnson, WR
Ed Reed, S
Patrick Willis, ILB
Champ Bailey, CB
Joe Thomas, OT
Troy Polamalu, S

Those are 11 guys you could throw into the bingo shaker with Fitz and argue about. Boldin never even makes the list.

I guess you'd have to ask what five-year period are you talking about—when it comes right down to it. Fitz has been a great player, but it's hard to be an elite WR when you don't have anyone throwing you the ball. It's exceptionally difficult to be a Top 5 player in the NFL at WR when you don't have anyone throwing you the ball.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,508
Reaction score
16,801
Location
The Giant Toaster
Just '08, or are you talking about the five-year period. His best regular season wasn't even tops in the NFL at the position — Andre Johnson had over 100 more yards.

Similar production at more impact positions:
DeMarcus Ware, OLB
Jared Allen, DE
Adrian Peterson, RB
Drew Brees, QB
Peyton Manning, QB

Similar protection at similar impact positions:
Andre Johnson, WR
Ed Reed, S
Patrick Willis, ILB
Champ Bailey, CB
Joe Thomas, OT
Troy Polamalu, S

Those are 11 guys you could throw into the bingo shaker with Fitz and argue about. Boldin never even makes the list.

I guess you'd have to ask what five-year period are you talking about—when it comes right down to it. Fitz has been a great player,but it's hard to be an elite WR when you don't have anyone throwing you the ball. It's exceptionally difficult to be a Top 5 player in the NFL at WR when you don't have anyone throwing you the ball.

Well he didn't have the version of Kurt Warner we loved his entire career. In Fitz' 7-year prime from 05'-11' he led the NFL in TD receptions, receiving yards and was 3rd in total receptions to Wes Welker and Reggie Wayne. How many of those years did Fitz have quality QB play compared to those other two receivers?

Over that span:
Welker had Brady
Wayne had Manning
Fitz had the gloves version of Kurt for two years...
 
Last edited:

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
37,149
Reaction score
27,044
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Well he didn't have the version of Kurt Warner we loved his entire career. In Fitz' 7-year prime from 05'-11' he led the NFL in TD receptions, receiving yards and was 3rd in total receptions to Wes Welker and Reggie Wayne. How many of those years did Fitz have quality QB play compared to those other two receivers?

Over that span:
Welker had Brady
Wayne had Manning
Fitz had the gloves version of Kurt for two years...

So what? Your argument is top 10 NFL player overall. Great WR; no one's arguing with that. Maybe he's a hall of famer if he can put together a couple more 1000+ yard seasons.

But WR isn't ever a top 3 positional value. Maybe not top 5.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
35,498
Reaction score
6,932
Location
Scottsdale
So what? Your argument is top 10 NFL player overall. Great WR; no one's arguing with that. Maybe he's a hall of famer if he can put together a couple more 1000+ yard seasons.

But WR isn't ever a top 3 positional value. Maybe not top 5.

True... for the most part. However, back in the days of the Super Bowl run, Fitz was arguably OUR top 2-3 player/positional/value, next to Kurt of course! ;)
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,508
Reaction score
16,801
Location
The Giant Toaster
So what? Your argument is top 10 NFL player overall. Great WR; no one's arguing with that. Maybe he's a hall of famer if he can put together a couple more 1000+ yard seasons.

But WR isn't ever a top 3 positional value. Maybe not top 5.

Over that 7 year span no. If you take his two year peak window including the postseason, yes he was elite in my opinion. Ragarding the HOF he could probably play two more solid years and get in.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,793
Location
Chandler
So what? Your argument is top 10 NFL player overall. Great WR; no one's arguing with that. Maybe he's a hall of famer if he can put together a couple more 1000+ yard seasons.

But WR isn't ever a top 3 positional value. Maybe not top 5.

There are quite a few people saying he's a first ballot HoF'er. I would agree, but I'm a homer.
 

Austin Zonie

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Posts
1,033
Reaction score
70
Location
Austin TX
Fitz played his best when it mattered most. That's a plus in the elite category, imo. The best of the best up their game when it matters most.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,508
Reaction score
16,801
Location
The Giant Toaster
Good point. How many players at a given position can/should be considered elite?

Depends on the position. The furthest gap between the two best players at the same position is probably JJ Watt over the next best 3-tech (Wilkerson or CC). The difference between Aaron Rodgers aand the next best QB isn't nearly as wide. Same with WR imo.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
37,149
Reaction score
27,044
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Fitz played his best when it mattered most. That's a plus in the elite category, imo. The best of the best up their game when it matters most.

Game 1 vs Seahawks: DNP
Game 1 @ Seattle: 4 rec, 33 yards, 0 TDs
3 rec., 31 yards, 0 TDs versus the nobodies in the Carolina secondary.

Sure wish that Fitz had upped his game when it matters most last year.

Who's saying that Fitz is going to be a "First ballot" hall of famer? Kurt wasn't first-ballot, and he has a better case. Larry's numbers are going to look pretty pedestrian in seven or eight years, IMO. Right now he's only 21st all-time yards and TDs.
 

AZCrazy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 18, 2014
Posts
3,983
Reaction score
2,560
Fitz was a top 10 performer league-wide for the middle of his career. Just imagine the legend he would have been without five FULL years of Kolb,Leinart,Skelton,Lindley,Anderson,Stanton pissing away the prime of his productivity. And he was still great. Who else did he have trying to hit the broad side of a barn? St Pierre? Navarre? Rattay?
He'd already have his face carved into the outside of the stadium if we had a steady qb for all that time.
 

Austin Zonie

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Posts
1,033
Reaction score
70
Location
Austin TX
Game 1 vs Seahawks: DNP

Game 1 @ Seattle: 4 rec, 33 yards, 0 TDs

3 rec., 31 yards, 0 TDs versus the nobodies in the Carolina secondary.



Sure wish that Fitz had upped his game when it matters most last year.



Who's saying that Fitz is going to be a "First ballot" hall of famer? Kurt wasn't first-ballot, and he has a better case. Larry's numbers are going to look pretty pedestrian in seven or eight years, IMO. Right now he's only 21st all-time yards and TDs.


I guess I was thinking of his playoff performances with adequate QB play. 2008 & 2009 playoff performances are what come to mind.
 

Chaz

observationist
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Posts
11,327
Reaction score
7
Location
Wandering the Universe
Fitz played his best when it mattered most. That's a plus in the elite category, imo. The best of the best up their game when it matters most.
Exactly, who is going to step up and make a play when it is needed most.
Who is likely to make a play with the game on the line. Or the season on the line.
 

TimTheToolmanTebow

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Posts
177
Reaction score
0
Its why we won't win in the playoffs again. To have no decent players at RB, QB and OLB is a death sentence.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,461
Reaction score
16,602
Location
San Antonio, Texas
John Brown is on his way. It may be next season before it is fully realized but defenses are going to have a hard time dealing with him I think.

If Ellington can stay healthy he has real potential.

This... and Bethel is an elite ST player and yes that is legit :)
 

Catfish

Registered
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Posts
4,551
Reaction score
64
Back in the day, (when a 5 win season was meaningful), the Cards could only put fannies in the seats if the Cowboys or Vikings or Bears were coming into town. Even then the stadium turned to Silver---------Purple-------or Black------------depending on the team we were playing. The old man always had an elite player on the roster to put fannies in the seats without breaking the bank.

Now-------we have constant sellouts, and a deep roster, so Marquee names are not only not needed, but detrimental to freeing enough money to pay the core players.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
19,744
Reaction score
10,588
Elite = MVP caliber player
Star = top 5 at their position in the league

Your definition of elite shoots down the entire premise of your opening post. If "Elite" is an MVP caliber player then we've never had an elite player... ever. The only record I can find of any player even getting a vote was Kurt Warner in 2008... when he received 1 (one, the singular) vote. This put him 7th in the ballot.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,876
Name 3 players who you would take over him at his position.

1) JJ Watt
2)....
3)...

2. Mohammed Wilkerson
3. Marcel Darius

Campbell is good but currently in the NFL there are some ridiculous good big men on defense.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,508
Reaction score
16,801
Location
The Giant Toaster
Your definition of elite shoots down the entire premise of your opening post. If "Elite" is an MVP caliber player then we've never had an elite player... ever. The only record I can find of any player even getting a vote was Kurt Warner in 2008... when he received 1 (one, the singular) vote. This put him 7th in the ballot.

Ok new system

Super elite: top-10 (MVP caliber)
Elite: top 2-3 at their position (dominant)
Star: top 5-7 at their position (star)
Great: top 7-11 at their position (quality starter)

How many guys would you put in tier 1?
 

Shaggy

Site Owner Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Posts
9,024
Reaction score
2,955
Location
Arizona
I wouldn't match up a WR to a QB and try to figure who is more elite. You don't do it that way. Its per position. So Fitz to me is an elite WR, CC is an elite DL, Justin Bethel is an elite player on ST. I go by position and not overall. That's how I see it.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,523
Location
SE valley
Ok new system

Super elite: top-10 (MVP caliber)
Elite: top 2-3 at their position (dominant)
Star: top 5-7 at their position (star)
Great: top 7-11 at their position (quality starter)

How many guys would you put in tier 1?

Does it matter? Who have we had that was in your tier one in the past?

How many tier 1s did baltimore have for their superbowl?
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
538,033
Posts
5,275,764
Members
6,277
Latest member
jdndndn
Top