The 2018-2019 Around the NBA thread

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
59,897
Reaction score
51,211
Location
SoCal
Here's a question.
A number of us in here wanted Adams but who would have the huevos to reach for him at 5? I thought about it but I don't think I advocated it in here - I did propose trades we could make with OKC to get the pick they used to nab him.

A related question: does anyone, right now, have to huevos to claim they'd have picked Adams at 5 if it had been their decision.
No one stumped for him with our top pick in my recollection.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,772
Here's a question.
A number of us in here wanted Adams but who would have the huevos to reach for him at 5? I thought about it but I don't think I advocated it in here - I did propose trades we could make with OKC to get the pick they used to nab him.

A related question: does anyone, right now, have to huevos to claim they'd have picked Adams at 5 if it had been their decision.

IIRC, @SunsTzu liked Adams a lot. Perhaps enough to draft him at #5.

I would have taken Len at #5 but he had me excited about Adams.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,772
I wanted Adams but we didn't have a pick in that range.

This is where teams often get in trouble in the draft. They are afraid to pass on potential and end up drafting the wrong player. Len might have been one of those players.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,099
Reaction score
60,396
Ah ok. The way your post was worded made it seem like you thought Beasley was still a free agent.

Carmelo maturing with age and accepting a lesser role? Yeah, not gonna happen. The Rockets made a big mistake here.

agreed.
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,765
Reaction score
1,434
IIRC, @SunsTzu liked Adams a lot. Perhaps enough to draft him at #5.

I would have taken Len at #5 but he had me excited about Adams.

I liked him at 5 but knew it wouldn't happen. I could have been talked into any of the top picks that year as long as it wasn't Bennett or Noel.

For the record I was also really high on Goodwin and had Gobert with Bennett and Noel as a guy I wanted nothing to do with.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
35,866
Reaction score
14,554
I don't remember exactly why but I'm pretty sure I was not on the Adams bandwagon back then. I think it had to do with a supposedly questionable work ethic? Not that I felt strongly about him, I tend to avoid forming much of an opinion on the international players.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
59,897
Reaction score
51,211
Location
SoCal
I don't remember exactly why but I'm pretty sure I was not on the Adams bandwagon back then. I think it had to do with a supposedly questionable work ethic? Not that I felt strongly about him, I tend to avoid forming much of an opinion on the international players.
Didn’t he play at Pitt?
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,765
Reaction score
1,434
I don't remember exactly why but I'm pretty sure I was not on the Adams bandwagon back then. I think it had to do with a supposedly questionable work ethic? Not that I felt strongly about him, I tend to avoid forming much of an opinion on the international players.


Didn’t he play at Pitt?

Yes and he spent a Year in HS before that. I watched most of his games at Pitt which is why I was so high on him.
 
OP
OP
Phrazbit

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
19,562
Reaction score
10,284
I think I had Adams and Len as the players I most wanted to avoid.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
15,976
Reaction score
10,863
Location
Tempe, AZ
This is the first offseason that both Carmelo and Lebron have been free agents in. They've had options and extensions before that kept them from hitting the open market at the same time. They didn't hit the market at the same time but they were both still free agents for a period of time this offseason. At Lebron's age he could still get a max deal from any team that he wanted to sign with. Meanwhile Melo was basically paid to stay away from a playoff team in OKC and a lottery team in Atlanta. He ended up needing to settle for a league minimum deal with the Rockets for 1 year. Even at the league minimum, I don't think he could have picked any team in the league to go to either.

I remember during their rookie seasons there was a debate about which them deserved Rookie of the Year more. Carmelo took the Nuggets to the playoffs that year and Lebron missed out on the Cavaliers. Statistically they were fairly similar that year also. Lebron didn't have a year in college like Melo did but they were closer in talent throughout their first 2 or 3 years in the league before they started realizing their potential a bit more. Lebron was always more of a playmaker and it took a little while for Cleveland to add players around him so he could show that as well. He had to do a lot more in his first and second year in the league. His longevity is definitely uncommon, he's 34 and still worth a max deal, but it's odd to think how far Carmelo has fallen just in comparison to Lebron because they were compared so often early on. I don't think Melo could have gotten a max deal from any team he wanted just 2 or 3 seasons ago but Lebron has never been in a position where he couldn't choose his own destination and that other team would say no to it.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,247
Reaction score
16,392
Location
The Giant Toaster
Pretty simple. Melo was a iso-scorer that never played defense or made players around him better.

Had Detroit drafted him he would’ve been perfect given his skills on that team being surrounded by defenders. Their championship window would’ve been 4-5 years.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
15,976
Reaction score
10,863
Location
Tempe, AZ
Pretty simple. Melo was a iso-scorer that never played defense or made players around him better.

Had Detroit drafted him he would’ve been perfect given his skills on that team being surrounded by defenders. Their championship window would’ve been 4-5 years.

That's a possibility but Larry Brown didn't like rookies or young players in general. He was the coach of the 2004 Olympic team that got the Bronze that had Melo, Lebron, and Amare. The younger guys were basically glued to the bench. Lebron averaged 5.4 ppg, Melo 2.4 ppg, and Amare had 2.8 ppg. Brown did not play them much, at all. Emeka Okafor was there also and only saw time in 2 games but didn't score at all. Melo only played in 7 of the 8 games. Everyone else played in all 8 games but I can't find the minutes they played, their scoring says how little though.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/olympics/teams/USA/2004
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,247
Reaction score
16,392
Location
The Giant Toaster
That's a possibility but Larry Brown didn't like rookies or young players in general. He was the coach of the 2004 Olympic team that got the Bronze that had Melo, Lebron, and Amare. The younger guys were basically glued to the bench. Lebron averaged 5.4 ppg, Melo 2.4 ppg, and Amare had 2.8 ppg. Brown did not play them much, at all. Emeka Okafor was there also and only saw time in 2 games but didn't score at all. Melo only played in 7 of the 8 games. Everyone else played in all 8 games but I can't find the minutes they played, their scoring says how little though.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/olympics/teams/USA/2004

He would’ve been the Microwave for those Detroit teams. They really had no bench whatsoever after title year. Imagine had they taken Wade. Three straight championships guaranteed. How does Joe D sleep at night?
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
15,976
Reaction score
10,863
Location
Tempe, AZ
He would’ve been the Microwave for those Detroit teams. They really had no bench whatsoever after title year. Imagine had they taken Wade. Three straight championships guaranteed. How does Joe D sleep at night?

Wade is more likely, I think. He spent 2 years at Marquette and was more mature when he entered the league than Melo. Bosh is another possibility. Anyone other than Darko could have helped them get another title. That Pistons/Spurs series the next year was quality basketball but it was ugly also. As a basketball fan, I didn't care 2 defensive teams met in the finals but I know ratings dipped quite a bit. Seeing Pop coach against Brown and those 2 teams going at it made for a great chess match of sorts though.
 
OP
OP
Phrazbit

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
19,562
Reaction score
10,284
He would’ve been the Microwave for those Detroit teams. They really had no bench whatsoever after title year. Imagine had they taken Wade. Three straight championships guaranteed. How does Joe D sleep at night?

On a pile of money with 3 championship rings.

But yeah, he probably does regret that one.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
15,976
Reaction score
10,863
Location
Tempe, AZ
Tim Reynolds‏Verified account@ByTimReynolds 59m59 minutes ago
Tim Reynolds Retweeted Shams Charania

Carmelo will finish his Hawks career last in all-time scoring (0) and first in average salary ($28 million).

That's actually a fairly interesting useless stat. I'm not a fan of the buyout idea in the NBA. I'm not sure why it became the thing to do or what it was that really started it but it's hurt the competitive of the league while also helping it in a weird way. Vet's get bought out by bad teams and join contenders and so long as they don't join the favorite for the title it helps boost another team's chance of competing. I definitely think it hurts more than helps though. I believe it started around the same time that the league got the players association to go along with the amnesty clause. That allowed players to get paid without doing anything and then they'd sign elsewhere. That's when you started to see buyouts come about more often.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,772
That's actually a fairly interesting useless stat. I'm not a fan of the buyout idea in the NBA. I'm not sure why it became the thing to do or what it was that really started it but it's hurt the competitive of the league while also helping it in a weird way. Vet's get bought out by bad teams and join contenders and so long as they don't join the favorite for the title it helps boost another team's chance of competing. I definitely think it hurts more than helps though. I believe it started around the same time that the league got the players association to go along with the amnesty clause. That allowed players to get paid without doing anything and then they'd sign elsewhere. That's when you started to see buyouts come about more often.

After a player is bought out I think they should have to submit to claims by the worst teams first, sort of like the waiver process. Although I'm doubtful this happens, it would help cure these shenanigans.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
15,976
Reaction score
10,863
Location
Tempe, AZ
After a player is bought out I think they should have to submit to claims by the worst teams first, sort of like the waiver process. Although I'm doubtful this happens, it would help cure these shenanigans.

I'd be ok with that but I can see the players association throwing a fit. I think the only way they might let that happen is if only teams currently in the top 8 in each conference could submit claims or maybe teams with records above 500. That would solve the problem of teams who are talent rich from getting richer. A player shouldn't have a problem going to a team that is playoff bound. Ring chasing would need to be done in the offseason and not if they're on a team where things aren't working out.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
21,754
Reaction score
6,138
I wonder if the NBA could do a compensatory pick thing like the NFL does for teams that lose major free agents.

If they want to even things out, they could take first round picks away from teams over the luxury tax, and award extra picks to teams who lose high value free agents.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,772
I'd be ok with that but I can see the players association throwing a fit. I think the only way they might let that happen is if only teams currently in the top 8 in each conference could submit claims or maybe teams with records above 500. That would solve the problem of teams who are talent rich from getting richer. A player shouldn't have a problem going to a team that is playoff bound. Ring chasing would need to be done in the offseason and not if they're on a team where things aren't working out.

I wonder if the NBA could do a compensatory pick thing like the NFL does for teams that lose major free agents.

If they want to even things out, they could take first round picks away from teams over the luxury tax, and award extra picks to teams who lose high value free agents.

I like these ideas. Too bad we need the players and owners to agree to this.

Adding a cost element (draft picks) for those teams who skim talent would be nice.
 
Top