Should we trade Josh Sweat?

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,700
Reaction score
48,839
Location
UK
Advocating for the perpetual two steps forward three steps back method of teambuilding seems mad to me. You simply dont get get better by constantly jettisoning your hgigher end talent (I get that its relative, team by team) and replace them with hopes and dreams.

At some point you have to build on a solid foundation. You cant keep taking it back to bare earth. There are better ways to move forward.

Sweat is a 29 year old speed rusher that has played about 60% of available snaps in his career.

Sweat isn't a foundation of anything, he's a Edge #2 on a playoff quality team. He's Alex Highsmith but with 15% less snaps.

We have no QB. By the time we have a QB worth anything Sweat will be a 31 years old speed rusher in decline.

Cash in while you can and use that to get the QB we need.

And that's not even factoring in him obviously being unhappy that we sacked the reason he came here and the potential decline that will come with having a guy not giving 100%.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,415
Reaction score
56,370
Location
Colorado
Sweat is a 29 year old speed rusher that has played about 60% of available snaps in his career.

Sweat isn't a foundation of anything, he's a Edge #2 on a playoff quality team. He's Alex Highsmith but with 15% less snaps.

We have no QB. By the time we have a QB worth anything Sweat will be a 31 years old speed rusher in decline.

Cash in while you can and use that to get the QB we need.

And that's not even factoring in him obviously being unhappy that we sacked the reason he came here and the potential decline that will come with having a guy not giving 100%.
I understand that you find this as a valid argument, but it doesn't land for me. They don't need the money, they aren't spending it. They don't need to get young pass rushers reps, they don't really have any. They don't need the picks, they haven't done great with the ones they have had.

IMO, if they are going to draft a young QB, better to have a pass rusher on the decline who is at least a better than league average to help support that QB than a 3rd round pick that likely will not amount to anything.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,353
Reaction score
19,101
Location
Chandler, Az
Sweat is a 29 year old speed rusher that has played about 60% of available snaps in his career.

Sweat isn't a foundation of anything, he's a Edge #2 on a playoff quality team. He's Alex Highsmith but with 15% less snaps.

We have no QB. By the time we have a QB worth anything Sweat will be a 31 years old speed rusher in decline.

Cash in while you can and use that to get the QB we need.

And that's not even factoring in him obviously being unhappy that we sacked the reason he came here and the potential decline that will come with having a guy not giving 100%.

No! Just No!
 

JohnnyCakes

Alpha Male
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2020
Posts
7,536
Reaction score
4,954
Location
Chicago
Sweat is a 29 year old speed rusher that has played about 60% of available snaps in his career.

Sweat isn't a foundation of anything, he's a Edge #2 on a playoff quality team. He's Alex Highsmith but with 15% less snaps.

We have no QB. By the time we have a QB worth anything Sweat will be a 31 years old speed rusher in decline.

Cash in while you can and use that to get the QB we need.

And that's not even factoring in him obviously being unhappy that we sacked the reason he came here and the potential decline that will come with having a guy not giving 100%.
He came to AZ for the contract.
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,682
Reaction score
3,458
Location
Charleston, SC
Sweat is a 29 year old speed rusher that has played about 60% of available snaps in his career.

Sweat isn't a foundation of anything, he's a Edge #2 on a playoff quality team. He's Alex Highsmith but with 15% less snaps.

We have no QB. By the time we have a QB worth anything Sweat will be a 31 years old speed rusher in decline.

Cash in while you can and use that to get the QB we need.

And that's not even factoring in him obviously being unhappy that we sacked the reason he came here and the potential decline that will come with having a guy not giving 100%.
At some point you have to start establishing the credibility of the organization if you want to be able to do anything, be taken seriously by potential free agenst, to not be told by player representation to "not draft my guy" You have to win now. we ESPECIALLY have to win now. When you suck as perpetually as we do, you dont get to play the long game. You have to play for now. Jettisoning talent does not accomplish anything for us.
 

Crimson Warrior

Ready For The Next Chapter
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
9,583
Reaction score
12,767
Location
Home of the Thunder
Sweat is a 29 year old speed rusher that has played about 60% of available snaps in his career.

Sweat isn't a foundation of anything, he's a Edge #2 on a playoff quality team. He's Alex Highsmith but with 15% less snaps.

We have no QB. By the time we have a QB worth anything Sweat will be a 31 years old speed rusher in decline.

Cash in while you can and use that to get the QB we need.

And that's not even factoring in him obviously being unhappy that we sacked the reason he came here and the potential decline that will come with having a guy not giving 100%.

I’ll go against the grain a little here and agree with you Brit if the plan is to draft a QB next year.

But how can that be Monti’s long term plan?

He’ll be the one getting sacked if we lose 12 or 13 games again.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,700
Reaction score
48,839
Location
UK
I understand that you find this as a valid argument, but it doesn't land for me. They don't need the money, they aren't spending it. They don't need to get young pass rushers reps, they don't really have any. They don't need the picks, they haven't done great with the ones they have had.

IMO, if they are going to draft a young QB, better to have a pass rusher on the decline who is at least a better than league average to help support that QB than a 3rd round pick that likely will not amount to anything.

They do need the picks.

The Browns and Jets both have multiple 1st round picks. We have no QB. We need all the capital we can get to make sure we get out of quarterback purgatory. Nothing else concerns me.

Certainly not hanging on to a 29 year old disgruntled speed rusher that averages 8 sacks a year and plays 60% of the snaps and didn't do anything of note on the 29th ranked defense. I really couldn't care less if he stayed or went. But given our QB situation I'd rather get the capital.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,700
Reaction score
48,839
Location
UK
I’ll go against the grain a little here and agree with you Brit if the plan is to draft a QB next year.

But how can that be Monti’s long term plan?

He’ll be the one getting sacked if we lose 12 or 13 games again.

The team is set up to lose 10+ games. Everyone knows it including the FO.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,700
Reaction score
48,839
Location
UK
At some point you have to start establishing the credibility of the organization if you want to be able to do anything, be taken seriously by potential free agenst, to not be told by player representation to "not draft my guy" You have to win now. we ESPECIALLY have to win now. When you suck as perpetually as we do, you dont get to play the long game. You have to play for now. Jettisoning talent does not accomplish anything for us.

Josh Sweat is going to make zero difference to how much we win this year.
 

Crimson Warrior

Ready For The Next Chapter
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
9,583
Reaction score
12,767
Location
Home of the Thunder
The team is set up to lose 10+ games. Everyone knows it including the FO.

That’s what I’m saying. There’s no tomorrow for MO.

Considering it must have been divine intervention that saved Monti’s job this past season, his only hope of staying employed currently is for this sorry lot to fight and kick and scratch its way to seven wins this season.

A task that will be notably more difficult without the services of Sweat.

I’m agreeing with you, I’m just saying there’s a conflict of interest right now between Monti and what’s best for the Cardinals.

As if this dumpster fire of an organization didn’t need need another problem, it has a lame duck GM who’s surely desperate to save his job, and is flailing around like a mad man the future be damned.
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,758
Reaction score
54,440
Location
Las Vegas
As the only proven pass rusher on the team how can you say this? If the Cardinals win any games this year it will most likely be due to Sweat harassing the opposing QB.
I’m on your side of the argument, but he does have a point even if sweat helps us win two or three games out of the four or five we might win at most does it really matter in the end? All that does is put us in a range outside of top quarterback selection.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,353
Reaction score
19,101
Location
Chandler, Az
I’m on your side of the argument, but he does have a point even if sweat helps us win two or three games out of the four or five we might win at most does it really matter in the end? All that does is put us in a range outside of top quarterback selection.

There will be plenty of QBs available in next years draft. Worst case the Cardinals will have to trade up to get their guy. That doesn't mean that the Cardinals need to get rid of their best pass rusher. Sweat still has 3 years on his contract at a very cap friendly rate for a proven pass rusher. He will be in his prime that entire time. There is zero reason to move off of him at this point.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,116
Reaction score
42,477
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I’m on your side of the argument, but he does have a point even if sweat helps us win two or three games out of the four or five we might win at most does it really matter in the end? All that does is put us in a range outside of top quarterback selection.
No team has ever lost its way to consistent success. Losing 13 games is cultural poison—part of the reason many here supported Monti’s clear-cutting the roster his first time through.

Now we have another group of players who have zero idea what it takes to become a winning team.

Sweat is literally the only guy.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,116
Reaction score
42,477
Location
Gilbert, AZ
There will be plenty of QBs available in next years draft. Worst case the Cardinals will have to trade up to get their guy. That doesn't mean that the Cardinals need to get rid of their best pass rusher. Sweat still has 3 years on his contract at a very cap friendly rate for a proven pass rusher. He will be in his prime that entire time. There is zero reason to move off of him at this point.
Also there’s no chance we get enough draft capital to outbid the Jets anyway
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,415
Reaction score
56,370
Location
Colorado
They do need the picks.

The Browns and Jets both have multiple 1st round picks. We have no QB. We need all the capital we can get to make sure we get out of quarterback purgatory. Nothing else concerns me.

Certainly not hanging on to a 29 year old disgruntled speed rusher that averages 8 sacks a year and plays 60% of the snaps and didn't do anything of note on the 29th ranked defense. I really couldn't care less if he stayed or went. But given our QB situation I'd rather get the capital.
I don't view a 3rd round pick as a critical sticking point to get out of QB purgatory. They didn't need to trade one to get Kyler Murray. They only needed one to move up from 15 to 10 to get Josh Rosen. You can make an argument that saddling a rookie with a bad roster is one of the reasons the Cardinals have been in QB purgatory. This also plays into the fallacy that you have to be the worst team in a draft to find a QB. Several good NFL QBs were not the first QB drafted in their draft or were not drafted 1 overall.

Even with other QB needy teams having multiple picks, how many teams do you think will be worst than the Cardinals? And if this QB class is so good, why would it be an issue if he Cardinals somehow took the 2nd or 3rd QB in the draft? Ultimately, until this team, can show it is able to easily replace above average players with other above average players, they need to hold onto the few they actually have.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,625
Reaction score
38,626
Location
Orlando, FL
It would have to be at least a 2025 pick. If it’s a top team (likely), I’d need a first which seems very unlikely.
 

Adrian

Ronin forever
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
171,711
Reaction score
84,309
Location
Crowley, TX
I’d think we would get a 3rd round pick for sweat at best.imo
 
Top