Should we trade Josh Sweat?

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,412
Reaction score
33,041
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Yes. I'll explain why.

I have concerns about Sweat this year. I don't believe he asked for a trade, but I can imagine he's not happy. He's 29 years old and he's guaranteed a losing season.

From what I have seen of his he doesn't strike me as they "I'm going to do the job 100% no matter what because that's what I'm getting paid to do" type. He seems like the type that needs to be playing for something. This seems fairly evident in his stats last year.

5 of his 12 sacks came in the first 5 weeks. After week 10 he had 3 sacks.

He also very much seems like the type to think he's now vastly underpaid. Despite his low snap count.

I understand the "You can't trade your best players" line, but you can. People do. Because if they aren't all in then you aren't going to get much out of them, and they can be a negative in the locker room.

If he stays I can see it being a mediocre 6 sack season and next year we have a 30 year old guy with much less value.
So take an untalented defense and make it possibly the least talented defense in Cards history? Great plan :sarcasm:
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,369
Reaction score
56,234
Location
Colorado
Yes. I'll explain why.

I have concerns about Sweat this year. I don't believe he asked for a trade, but I can imagine he's not happy. He's 29 years old and he's guaranteed a losing season.

From what I have seen of his he doesn't strike me as they "I'm going to do the job 100% no matter what because that's what I'm getting paid to do" type. He seems like the type that needs to be playing for something. This seems fairly evident in his stats last year.

5 of his 12 sacks came in the first 5 weeks. After week 10 he had 3 sacks.

He also very much seems like the type to think he's now vastly underpaid. Despite his low snap count.

I understand the "You can't trade your best players" line, but you can. People do. Because if they aren't all in then you aren't going to get much out of them, and they can be a negative in the locker room.

If he stays I can see it being a mediocre 6 sack season and next year we have a 30 year old guy with much less value.
I appreciate your commitment to the collection of magic beans. One of the very few FAs Monti has added that has made a positive impact and you want to get rid of him for ?

There are franchises out there that this would make sense for. Minnesota did something like this with Greenard but they have a talented roster with expensive players and a former first round pick in Dallas Turner to replace him.

The Cardinals have none of those things.
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
5,105
Reaction score
2,071
I appreciate your commitment to the collection of magic beans. One of the very few FAs Monti has added that has made a positive impact and you want to get rid of him for ?

There are franchises out there that this would make sense for. Minnesota did something like this with Greenard but they have a talented roster with expensive players and a former first round pick in Dallas Turner to replace him.

The Cardinals have none of those things.
I'm sure tearing the roster back down to the studs again will totally work for Monti this time.
 
OP
OP
BooksOrangePlanet

BooksOrangePlanet

I was BirdGangThing
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
39,857
Reaction score
44,917
Location
Arcadia
do we want double digit sacks from your edge? yes

does he still want to be here? i haven't heard

what would he fetch? idk maybe a 3rd?

i say keep him unless he wants to bounce
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
14,969
Reaction score
13,037
I would say maybe. It depends on the offers. I know he is our only pass rusher, but he is on the older side, and he doesn't want to be here.

I know trading him this year makes us worse, but I have no expectations of that mattering.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,369
Reaction score
56,234
Location
Colorado
I would say maybe. It depends on the offers. I know he is our only pass rusher, but he is on the older side, and he doesn't want to be here.

I know trading him this year makes us worse, but I have no expectations of that mattering.
It's not about this year or next year, it is about the fact that you have to build a competitive roster to be competitive. You have to add talent. If you have to add vet talent, then you either choose to draft and develop players behind them or at other positions. Until you have players who can step into these vacated roles, you hold onto to good, veteran players.

Josh Sweat and Budda Baker are the two best players on this defense and it isn't particularly close. Budda is gone next year due to how his contract is structured. The team isn't in a position to just offload Sweat for 2nd or 3rd rounders.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,057
Reaction score
42,364
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Josh Sweat and Budda Baker are the two best players on this defense and it isn't particularly close.
This is BJ Ojulari erasure and I won’t stand for it.

Sweat and Baker are also two of the few expected starters under contract for 2027. Especially if ST5 and SMB are actually going to play.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
14,969
Reaction score
13,037
It's not about this year or next year, it is about the fact that you have to build a competitive roster to be competitive. You have to add talent. If you have to add vet talent, then you either choose to draft and develop players behind them or at other positions. Until you have players who can step into these vacated roles, you hold onto to good, veteran players.

Josh Sweat and Budda Baker are the two best players on this defense and it isn't particularly close. Budda is gone next year due to how his contract is structured. The team isn't in a position to just offload Sweat for 2nd or 3rd rounders.
Well, I wouldn't do it for just picks, if I am trading him I want a pick and a good young player at a position of need. Like I said it depends on what you can get for him.

Pass Rusher is pretty much the only position you can be overpaid for other than QB considering the lack of quality ones available.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,057
Reaction score
42,364
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Well, I wouldn't do it for just picks, if I am trading him I want a pick and a good young player at a position of need. Like I said it depends on what you can get for him.

Pass Rusher is pretty much the only position you can be overpaid for other than QB considering the lack of quality ones available.
Well you’re not going to get this.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
97,728
Reaction score
82,874
It's not about this year or next year, it is about the fact that you have to build a competitive roster to be competitive. You have to add talent. If you have to add vet talent, then you either choose to draft and develop players behind them or at other positions. Until you have players who can step into these vacated roles, you hold onto to good, veteran players.

Josh Sweat and Budda Baker are the two best players on this defense and it isn't particularly close. Budda is gone next year due to how his contract is structured. The team isn't in a position to just offload Sweat for 2nd or 3rd rounders.
especially when Monti has shown almost zero aptittude to replace good players in the draft.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,369
Reaction score
56,234
Location
Colorado
Well, I wouldn't do it for just picks, if I am trading him I want a pick and a good young player at a position of need. Like I said it depends on what you can get for him.

Pass Rusher is pretty much the only position you can be overpaid for other than QB considering the lack of quality ones available.
There are only two positions of need on this team that you might be able to fill via trade. 1 - pass rusher but trading Sweat just creates a need for another pass rusher. 2 - DL.

I will believe yo can get a good, young player at EDGE or DL AND a pick when we see it.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,694
Reaction score
48,826
Location
UK
So take an untalented defense and make it possibly the least talented defense in Cards history? Great plan :sarcasm:

I appreciate your commitment to the collection of magic beans. One of the very few FAs Monti has added that has made a positive impact and you want to get rid of him for ?

There are franchises out there that this would make sense for. Minnesota did something like this with Greenard but they have a talented roster with expensive players and a former first round pick in Dallas Turner to replace him.

The Cardinals have none of those things.


I'm pretty sure I said I expect Sweat to have a down year and explained why. In which case the limited talent I expect him to show isn't worth much.

He clearly stopped playing as soon as we started getting whooped. At the start of the year when we were in games his stats were much better. Later in the year when we started losing by double digits he vanished. I don't think the team should carry a disgruntled fair weather player.

What is worth more is what we could get for him now based on last years performance to use in the next draft where we absolutely need to find our future QB.

That is more important than Josh Sweat getting 6 sacks on a mediocre defense next year where, even when full healthy, he only played 60% of snaps.

Even if Sweat somehow repeated his 12 sack performance, what difference would it make? What difference did he make to the 3-14 team last year? If you could get a 2027 2nd round pick for him you snatch their hand off and don't look back.
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
8,397
Reaction score
11,361
Location
North of the 49th.
I'm pretty sure I said I expect Sweat to have a down year and explained why. In which case the limited talent I expect him to show isn't worth much.

He clearly stopped playing as soon as we started getting whooped. At the start of the year when we were in games his stats were much better. Later in the year when we started losing by double digits he vanished. I don't think the team should carry a disgruntled fair weather player.

What is worth more is what we could get for him now based on last years performance to use in the next draft where we absolutely need to find our future QB.

That is more important than Josh Sweat getting 6 sacks on a mediocre defense next year where, even when full healthy, he only played 60% of snaps.

Even if Sweat somehow repeated his 12 sack performance, what difference would it make? What difference did he make to the 3-14 team last year? If you could get a 2027 2nd round pick for him you snatch their hand off and don't look back.

And I thought you were humourless. ;)
 

Cardinal88

All Star
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Posts
649
Reaction score
1,116
Location
Phoenix
The answer to the original post is no we should not intertain trading him. He's an alpha dog and will come to play on Sundays (we can actually say Sunday because we have no prime time games, haha!). Anyway, I can't imagine Sweat taking time off but if he does, the team can trade him before the trade deadline. Most likely, we get more value trading him later than earlier.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,057
Reaction score
42,364
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Why do you say that? He appears to be pretty active as a pass-rusher. I can't imagine that he would take time off on plays.
He’s fine, but he’s not a leader or someone who’s especially connected to the team. He’s a weirdo with a nose ring.

Still productive and one of our two- or three-best defenders.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,330,901
Posts
6,545,002
Members
6,431
Latest member
Arlene Lake
Top