Mitch
Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
What we do know:
1. Thus far, none of the players the Cardinals waived have been claimed or signed by other teams. From that perspective the coaches did a good job---it means that they will be able to hold on to a number of the young players they like by signing them to the practice squad.
2. Five TEs were claimed by teams above the Cardinals in the WWC pecking order:
KC: Sean McGrath (SEA)
JX: Clay Harbor (PHI)
JX: D.J. Williams (GB)
CL: Marqueis Gray (SF)
CL: Keavon Milton (NO)
3. 2 DTs were claimed ahead of the Cardinals:
KC: Jaye Howard (SEA)
OAK: Brian Sanford (CLE)
4. 3 Guards...
JX: Jacques McClendon (ATL)
OAK: Antoine McClain (BAL)
CLE: Patrick Lewis (GB)
5. Notable Names the Cardinals Could Have Claimed But Didn't:
MIN: T J'Marcus Webb (CHI)
SD: DT Drake Nevis (IND)
NYJ: G Ben Ijalana (IND)
NYJ: LB/DE Scott Solomon (TEN)
NE: C Braxton Cave (CLE)
NE: G Chris Barker (MIA)
NE: DT A.J. Francis (MIA)
IND: TE Jack Doyle (TEN)
TB: NT Chris Jones (HOU)
TB: WR Russell Shepard (PHI)
(Please add ones that I missed)
6. The Cardinals claimed T/TE Bradley Sowell (6-7, 320, 2, Mississippi, Colts). Was with BA and HC last year---was used at tackle and as a blocking TE. This video of Sowell back in 2009, shows that early on at Ole Miss he was used as a TE. BA must have picked up on this last year---or Sowell drew his attention to it. Can be used on STs as well. Figures to be one of the 45 actives on game day as a situational TE, backup T and STs player.
Bradley Sowell Interview 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzN5IXjQ70o
7. The Cardinals claimed NT Alameda Ta'amu (6-3, 348, 2, Washington, 2012 #109 pick 4th round, Steelers). Big beefy NT with off the field issues, who is strong on the upper half but not as much on the lower half, which does not bode well for NFL NTs. Interesting that with all the emphasis BA and TB have placed on weight with Dan Williams, that they counter with Ta'amu.
What We Don't Know:
1. Did the Cardinals put in a claim for any of the players that were claimed ahead of them (mentioned above)? I am guessing that they put in a claim for Clay Harbor or D.J. Williams---and possibly Marqueis Gray who has tremendous potential.
2. What trade discussions the Cardinals were having regarding the CBs and/or RB Ryan Williams? Steve Keim said earlier in the week that teams had been calling about the CBs. This is why they held on to CB Brian McCann---in case they did trade Fleming or Cason. We know that no trades have been made---so whatever teams were offering, it wasn't enough. Possible miscalculation there---or simply a conclusion that they would rather keep Fleming and Williams.
3. What is the plan at WR? Carrying 4 (plus Patrick Peterson) makes the offense (predicated on a vertical passing game) especially vulnerable should any of the WRs get injured or gassed. Plus, right now Rob Houlsler the top TE is nursing an ankle injury. There may be a plan in place for a veteran WR who will sign after week one (I have been wondering if they discussed this with Mike Thomas). But some roster decision needs to be made here sooner rather than later.
4 How long will the team keep 5 RBs? BA doesn't like to juggle RBs, so the need for 5 seems superfluous.
1. Thus far, none of the players the Cardinals waived have been claimed or signed by other teams. From that perspective the coaches did a good job---it means that they will be able to hold on to a number of the young players they like by signing them to the practice squad.
2. Five TEs were claimed by teams above the Cardinals in the WWC pecking order:
KC: Sean McGrath (SEA)
JX: Clay Harbor (PHI)
JX: D.J. Williams (GB)
CL: Marqueis Gray (SF)
CL: Keavon Milton (NO)
3. 2 DTs were claimed ahead of the Cardinals:
KC: Jaye Howard (SEA)
OAK: Brian Sanford (CLE)
4. 3 Guards...
JX: Jacques McClendon (ATL)
OAK: Antoine McClain (BAL)
CLE: Patrick Lewis (GB)
5. Notable Names the Cardinals Could Have Claimed But Didn't:
MIN: T J'Marcus Webb (CHI)
SD: DT Drake Nevis (IND)
NYJ: G Ben Ijalana (IND)
NYJ: LB/DE Scott Solomon (TEN)
NE: C Braxton Cave (CLE)
NE: G Chris Barker (MIA)
NE: DT A.J. Francis (MIA)
IND: TE Jack Doyle (TEN)
TB: NT Chris Jones (HOU)
TB: WR Russell Shepard (PHI)
(Please add ones that I missed)
6. The Cardinals claimed T/TE Bradley Sowell (6-7, 320, 2, Mississippi, Colts). Was with BA and HC last year---was used at tackle and as a blocking TE. This video of Sowell back in 2009, shows that early on at Ole Miss he was used as a TE. BA must have picked up on this last year---or Sowell drew his attention to it. Can be used on STs as well. Figures to be one of the 45 actives on game day as a situational TE, backup T and STs player.
Bradley Sowell Interview 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzN5IXjQ70o
7. The Cardinals claimed NT Alameda Ta'amu (6-3, 348, 2, Washington, 2012 #109 pick 4th round, Steelers). Big beefy NT with off the field issues, who is strong on the upper half but not as much on the lower half, which does not bode well for NFL NTs. Interesting that with all the emphasis BA and TB have placed on weight with Dan Williams, that they counter with Ta'amu.
What We Don't Know:
1. Did the Cardinals put in a claim for any of the players that were claimed ahead of them (mentioned above)? I am guessing that they put in a claim for Clay Harbor or D.J. Williams---and possibly Marqueis Gray who has tremendous potential.
2. What trade discussions the Cardinals were having regarding the CBs and/or RB Ryan Williams? Steve Keim said earlier in the week that teams had been calling about the CBs. This is why they held on to CB Brian McCann---in case they did trade Fleming or Cason. We know that no trades have been made---so whatever teams were offering, it wasn't enough. Possible miscalculation there---or simply a conclusion that they would rather keep Fleming and Williams.
3. What is the plan at WR? Carrying 4 (plus Patrick Peterson) makes the offense (predicated on a vertical passing game) especially vulnerable should any of the WRs get injured or gassed. Plus, right now Rob Houlsler the top TE is nursing an ankle injury. There may be a plan in place for a veteran WR who will sign after week one (I have been wondering if they discussed this with Mike Thomas). But some roster decision needs to be made here sooner rather than later.
4 How long will the team keep 5 RBs? BA doesn't like to juggle RBs, so the need for 5 seems superfluous.
Last edited: