- Jan 2, 2003
- Reaction score
Yea… bingo! Just like when PA used to argue haters wouldn’t give Keim credit if he won 15 years in a row!Bingo!!
Another great argument made without evidence that could never be disproven… because Keim hadn’t given the fans a chance to embrace the last seven years of suckitude.
Funny though that when the team was actually good his first 3 years, he got plenty of credit.
It’s weird the way that works, huh? Someone consistently does something well and they get praise (Keim’s first three years). And then when someone does consistently bad (the next 7 years) they get criticized.
BIZARRE how that happens. Almost unthinkable!