How Long Could Owners Hold Out--Stadium Issues

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
I really never gave much thought to how the owners could make payments on their stadiums, etc. The fact is the stadiums are a separate corporation from the franchise. Stadium funding is much more than NFL games. Following is some great information on how some issues play out if the strike drags on. Teams can easily pay all debt for a year or perhaps even two years. I do not see the players hanging together for two years with no pay. You can be sure there would be enough players would be ready to cross any picket line after one year or sooner. In the long run the players and owners would both lose money over which they fight:

"It's deadline time again for the NFL as the team owners and players stare in the face another expiration date.

Historically, the NFL has never lost an entire season to a strike. But its worth asking, from a credit-wise perspective, how long could the stadiums and teams hold out without having a negative impact on their credit?

I spoke with Jodi Hecht, director of Project Finance at Standard and Poor's, who recently ran analysis on this. At first S&P said if there was a work stoppage, the stadiums and teams could make their debt payments for as long as two years. They recently revised their outlook to one year. I decided to ask her why.

JH: We lowered the forecast because a federal judge ruled that the league/teams couldn't use the money from TV contracts to fund their operations. As a result, there would be less cushion to fund football assets.

Stadiums are typically legally separate entities from the teams. They each have their own revenue sources.

We have confidential ratings on NFL stadiums and we also look at the teams because they are a major tenant and we looked to see if they would both be OK if there was a work stoppage and in the short-term, we looked to see what kind of income they have—be it cash on hand, reserves and lines of credit, other sources of equity and contractual income.

In terms of contractually obligated income (COI) for the stadiums, it would be naming right contracts, advertising contracts, suites, club seats, things like that. Most of these contracts have usually have some sort of agreement where the suite holders will continue to pay as long as they receive a certain amount of events.

And they typically don't have to include football events, it can include other non-football events. For the stadium assets, their COI typically comprises somewhere between 50 to 80 percent of their total revenue so they will continue to receive that revenue even during a work stoppage.

Plus, in addition to that on the stadium side, these projects have reserve funds in case it has operating problems, market problems. These reserve funds can cover six months of debt service payments. Some of them can even cover up to one year. So between the cash on hand plus the COI's, the stadiums could last at least a year with a work stoppage.

LL: What about the teams?

JH: Between the reserves on hand from the $900 million in shared revenue, and obviously if they are not playing games they have a reduced expenses so when we looked at their assets, we think they should be OK as well for a year if no games were played.

LL: What about attendance?

JH: Attendance tends to come back between 2-5 years to reach or surpass the non-strike attendance of the previous year and we see that trend in all professional sports in the U.S. And the reason why it comes back is because the teams discount the tickets to get the fans back in the seats so what we see is while attendance bounces back, ticket prices may not come back as quickly.

For example, the NHL took two to three years for ticket pricing to go back to pre-strike levels.

Ticket pricing is what takes the biggest hit.

________________________________________
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,876
I think the owners could "hold out" till our grandkids die.

We are talking about multi-billionaires.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
I think the owners could "hold out" till our grandkids die.

We are talking about multi-billionaires.

The ones who's main incomes are the football teams might have a harder time if they actually owe part of the debt on their stadiums.

We forget that these guys are "multi-billionaires" in net-worth. With football teams being worth 500 million to 2 billion dollars, that is a big chunk of their net worth. If football were to collapse and never come back, those teams would becomes worthless as the owners wouldn't have anyone to sell the rights to. Thus they wouldn't recover those 500 million to 2 billion dollars.

It's not like most of them have billions of dollars sitting in a bank.
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
Players do not manage their money and will quickly be yelling to the union to get back out there.

Owners have money stocked away...they will not cry over the bills....and most don't have the teams under their names so even if they fold...it's just a corporate name that folds and they keep their cash.

Players can not outlast the owners when it comes to money.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
I get your point.

But even those people who you talk about will never, ever be "broke". Not even close.

The players should never ever be broke either. If they make the vet minimum for their average 4 year career, they still have made about what low income Americans earn over their lifetime (about $1.2 million to be exact). It's really not a matter of how much money they have but if they are responsible with it. Otherwise we wouldn't hear all these stories about lottery winners and former celebrities, or former NBA players or NFL stars going broke.

Fact is if the players are responsible they have nothing to worry about either. But if they want to go around buying "bling" and driving luxury cars and living in mansions, then they do. That goes for the owners too. Maybe Jones or Snyder could get away with it, but the Bidwill's really don't have much else besides the team.
 
Top