Yeah... this is trending in a direction that isn't going to make anyone happy. Totally ineffective and his body is not holding up the punishment of playing inside.
I think he is playing in the wrong position. He should be at edge where he had the most success in college.
Major concern at this pointCan't believe we don't have an answer on Nolen yet btw makes me nervous it's not good
The report on Nolan is the injury is minor.Can't believe we don't have an answer on Nolen yet btw makes me nervous it's not good
I was thinking about this last game. The first two years we knew the defense was outgunned. But they played over their heads due to effort. This year... That same hunger is not there this yearThe idea of some of these guys playing "fast and violent" or "being disruptive" need to watch the Seattle defense again. Sure, Calais plays with intensity as does Budda but aside from those two, I don't see enough speed or violence.
Budda is coookkkkeed.The idea of some of these guys playing "fast and violent" or "being disruptive" need to watch the Seattle defense again. Sure, Calais plays with intensity as does Budda but aside from those two, I don't see enough speed or violence.
I’m affirming he’s on topof my trade list. This is especially tricky since I’m expecting Thompson to leave. Fortunately I think there’s a reasonable chance Baker brings back a third round pick. Since safeties historically drop in the draft, a decent replacement could be secured. Holding Baker longer will only diminish his value.Budda is coookkkkeed.
Why would anyone take PFFs grading system seriously?You must be registered for see images attach
You mean playing someone out of position from where he had most of his success is a bad thing?Yeah... this is trending in a direction that isn't going to make anyone happy. Totally ineffective and his body is not holding up the punishment of playing inside.
I think he is playing in the wrong position. He should be at edge where he had the most success in college.
lol… was this while Darnold was completing 10 passes in a row or where we were giving up 8 yards per run?DRob was playing well vs Seattle.
We would have traded him two years ago if that were the case. This is deranged.Fortunately I think there’s a reasonable chance Baker brings back a third round pick.
It’s still erratic but improving. They’ve refined their system and evaluators are more experienced. Most trams view their data.Why would anyone take PFFs grading system seriously?
Most teams use their charting data. I don’t think anyone trusts their grading system. Why would they?It’s still erratic but improving. They’ve refined their system and evaluators are more experienced. Most trams view their data.
Because it's another set of data that has potential value outside of whatever grading system the team uses? I get not using it as the be all end all, but to dismiss it completely is silly too.Most teams use their charting data. I don’t think anyone trusts their grading system. Why would they?
Just because it is different doesn't mean it is good. I struggle to believe that any NFL team is going to elevate some random's determinations of players when they have their own internals scouts to do so. Teams outsource the charting because it is is fairly objective and is easier to get the info that way vs having an intern do it.Because it's another set of data that has potential value outside of whatever grading system the team uses? I get not using it as the be all end all, but to dismiss it completely is silly too.
Someone with inside connections is telling you that teams use their data - maybe they also look into BritCard as well?My guess is that NFL teams would value PFF's grading system minimally above BritCard's. It's essentially the same thing that he is doing. Invest a lot of time watching the all-22 and making determinations based upon what he is seeing and his general knowledge.
It might not be as great as internal data, but what if your internal scouts suck? A different set of eyes seems to be something worth considering, but you clearly don't feel the same. PFF grades can be part of an argument but shouldn't be the main argument.Just because it is different doesn't mean it is good. I struggle to believe that any NFL team is going to elevate some random's determinations of players when they have their own internals scouts to do so. Teams outsource the charting because it is is fairly objective and is easier to get the info that way vs having an intern do it.
Using bad data (which NFL people call PFF grades without exception that I’ve seen—not broadcasters for whom it’s #content) is worse than using no additional data.Because it's another set of data that has potential value outside of whatever grading system the team uses? I get not using it as the be all end all, but to dismiss it completely is silly too.
Brick Johnson loves PFF gradesSomeone with inside connections is telling you that teams use their data - maybe they also look into BritCard as well?
It might not be as great as internal data, but what if your internal scouts suck? A different set of eyes seems to be something worth considering, but you clearly don't feel the same. PFF grades can be part of an argument but shouldn't be the main argument.