Scouting college prospects has a different focus than evaluating internal pro prospects. It's very little evaluation and mostly projection.
agree...but wasnt that what we were discussing??
Legit question, I may have misunderstood the topic entirely...but dont scouts now use grading/rrating systems similar to what pff has,...even if some of their methods of obtaining said grades is different?
I dunno...when I was a youth coach we held tryouts...hundreds of kids going through various drills...
I had a fancy sheet with all the players listed...and it all boiled down to a five star rating in four or five main topics...then a final rating...and sometimes a kid would only have 2 and 3 stars all down the sheet...but a final rating of five stars....the "IT" factor...sometimes the kid didnt stand out in anything other than I just knew he was a ball player.
point is I guess...any rating system is going to be subjective...there is no possible way to get hard data...you can get data on the result, but not on the process that led to it....have seen lots of guys that technically do everything wrong, or poorly...but somehow always win or make the play....and vice versa.
but rather its a pff grade, or a grade by my neighbor Miguel...or a pro scout with twenty years experience,..yourself, K9, cumulative DVOA, or Madden ratings..its all data points subjectively based on judgement and experience....the final decision will be based on trust(a rating system of its own)...but it seems to me a smart person will collect as many different data points as they can even if some are given less weight in the final decision.