Cards may value trading 2nd Rd Pick for Kyler, League Source says 3rd is market value

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,061
Reaction score
42,375
Location
Gilbert, AZ
40 year old Cousins will improve that record over 2 years? Cousin is a half measure, commit to youth or commit to riding Brissett until his replacement is on the roster.
I think Cousins can lead us to 7 or more wins in the most likely scenarios but his year.

I’m doubtful that Brissett can lead us to five wins this year.
 

Adrian

Ronin forever
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
171,301
Reaction score
83,975
Location
Crowley, TX
I’m not expecting much in return from the team that trades for Kyler.
 

cardcrazy

Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Posts
1,077
Reaction score
1,759
Since we won’t get much for Kyler’s trade…what about keeping him for another year?
I mean what are the options at QB that are better than Kyler for 2026.
I realize LaFleur would have to believe it’s a worthy effort.
Is this wise financially vs. cutting him or trading for a 3rd/4th pick?
We could always trade down in the draft and get some bad teams 2027 1st rd pick then go QB
 
Last edited:

JosiahLee

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Posts
2,999
Reaction score
6,132
Location
Gilbert
I don’t really understand this line of thought. I was told by many on this exact board when Kyler signed his extension four years ago that in a few years, his contract would be considered peanuts. That it would be cheap amongst quarterbacks who are the highest paid in the league. Yet now everybody says it’s a deterrent four years later for a trade. Even with the Cardinals, probably going to have to pick up a portion. If a GM likes Kyler and thinks he’s a possible winning quarterback for their organization the contract shouldn’t matter. Especially one that is now “peanuts” this many years later right?
Well to be fair, there’s a world where he’s like the 15th highest paid QB next year - Which isn’t exactly breaking the bank, but I get why most teams wouldn’t take on his contract. With his resume, or lack thereof to this point, GM’s want to feel like they are always winning the trade, and his contract likely involves too much risk.

Sam Darnold only got 10 million from the Vikings, and even after a 14 win season they didn’t care to resign him…GMs are just skeptical.

I actually think many teams would be interested in him this offseason if there was less financial risk.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
28,607
Reaction score
22,946
Location
The Giant Toaster
Just say no to Cousins. He is ancient and his body has taken a serious beating. There is zero future with Cousins. He would be a total waste of time and money IMO.
Can’t believe people want Cousins and his 6.4 YPA. We don’t have a back like Bijan for the offense to rely on (2300 yards from scrimmage).
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,296
Reaction score
13,959
I disagree. You are trying to buy one or two years to develop someone else. Obviously cost is going to matter in comparison to other options but Cousins would be fine provided he doesn't cost 40 mil.
Woof. I'd rather Brisket than Cousins. Honestly, why would we do this? (and I hated Brisket this last year)
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,413
Reaction score
33,044
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Since we won’t get much for Kyler’s trade…what about keeping him for another year?
I mean what are the options at QB that are better than Kyler for 2026.
I realize LaFleur would have to believe it’s a worthy effort.
Is this wise financially vs. cutting him or trading for a 3rd/4th pick?
We could always trade down in the draft and get some bad teams 2027 1st rd pick then go QB
How about Scotty No!

Actually, I'm serious. Just hell no. Why not? Because it would be so "Same 'ole Cards" that I'd be done watching before the season started.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
9,765
Reaction score
6,788
Location
Iowa
You're saying you think Brissett is a better starting QB than Cousins at this point? Not sure that's true.
It is really irrelevant. If Minnesota finds the cap space he'll be a Viking (again) imo.

Somewhere in rounds 2 to 5 we are likely to draft a QB. But if ML wants Malik Willis we may make a run at him.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
20,996
Reaction score
22,852
It is really irrelevant. If Minnesota finds the cap space he'll be a Viking (again) imo.

Somewhere in rounds 2 to 5 we are likely to draft a QB. But if ML wants Malik Willis we may make a run at him.
The Vikings are a serious team trying to win - why would they want Cousins?
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,698
Reaction score
4,669
Location
Monroe NC
Hollywood Brown went for a 1 - I think with the QB market being trash both in FA/Draft people might be surprised at the return, and all you need is 1 dumb team!
What you are forgetting is that one dumb team was Keim and the Cardinals. I don't think Brown would have fetched a one from any other team.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
20,996
Reaction score
22,852
What you are forgetting is that one dumb team was Keim and the Cardinals. I don't think Brown would have fetched a one from any other team.
Agreed - but there are other dumb teams! I certainly don't expect a 1st, but maybe a 2nd next year or a pick swap, or a good 3rd?
 
Top