Cards may value trading 2nd Rd Pick for Kyler, League Source says 3rd is market value

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
20,999
Reaction score
22,857
I’d love to hear the long list of ridiculous assets given up for questionable veteran QBs since 2020. Feel free to include the fate of the GMs who made those trades in the following 12-18 months.
  • Russell Wilson (2022): Traded by the Seahawks to the Broncos for two first-round picks, two second-round picks, a fifth-round pick, and players.
  • Deshaun Watson (2022): Traded by the Texans to the Browns for three first-round picks, a third-round pick, and a fourth-round pick.
  • Carson Wentz (2021): Traded by the Eagles to the Colts for a 2021 third-round pick and a 2022 first-round pick.
  • Aaron Rodgers (2021): Aaron Rodgers to the New York Jets along with the No. 15 overall pick (first round) and a 2023 fifth-round pick (No. 170). In exchange, the Packers received the No. 13 pick, a second-round pick (No. 42), a sixth-round pick (No. 207) in 2023, and a conditional 2024 second-round pick.
  • Matt Ryan (2022): Traded by the Falcons to the Colts for a 2022 third-round pick.
  • Teddy Bridgewater (2020): Traded by the Jets to the Saints (along with a 6th-round pick) for a 2019 third-round pick.
You can do your own research on the GMs!
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,341
Reaction score
19,075
Location
Chandler, Az
  • Russell Wilson (2022): Traded by the Seahawks to the Broncos for two first-round picks, two second-round picks, a fifth-round pick, and players.
  • Deshaun Watson (2022): Traded by the Texans to the Browns for three first-round picks, a third-round pick, and a fourth-round pick.
  • Carson Wentz (2021): Traded by the Eagles to the Colts for a 2021 third-round pick and a 2022 first-round pick.
  • Aaron Rodgers (2021): Aaron Rodgers to the New York Jets along with the No. 15 overall pick (first round) and a 2023 fifth-round pick (No. 170). In exchange, the Packers received the No. 13 pick, a second-round pick (No. 42), a sixth-round pick (No. 207) in 2023, and a conditional 2024 second-round pick.
  • Matt Ryan (2022): Traded by the Falcons to the Colts for a 2022 third-round pick.
  • Teddy Bridgewater (2020): Traded by the Jets to the Saints (along with a 6th-round pick) for a 2019 third-round pick.
You can do your own research on the GMs!
Wow. Forgot about a bunch of those trades. Nice job!
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
34,411
Reaction score
34,789
Location
PDX
  • Russell Wilson (2022): Traded by the Seahawks to the Broncos for two first-round picks, two second-round picks, a fifth-round pick, and players.
  • Deshaun Watson (2022): Traded by the Texans to the Browns for three first-round picks, a third-round pick, and a fourth-round pick.
  • Carson Wentz (2021): Traded by the Eagles to the Colts for a 2021 third-round pick and a 2022 first-round pick.
  • Aaron Rodgers (2021): Aaron Rodgers to the New York Jets along with the No. 15 overall pick (first round) and a 2023 fifth-round pick (No. 170). In exchange, the Packers received the No. 13 pick, a second-round pick (No. 42), a sixth-round pick (No. 207) in 2023, and a conditional 2024 second-round pick.
  • Matt Ryan (2022): Traded by the Falcons to the Colts for a 2022 third-round pick.
  • Teddy Bridgewater (2020): Traded by the Jets to the Saints (along with a 6th-round pick) for a 2019 third-round pick.
You can do your own research on the GMs!
Didn't 4 of those guys win SBs?
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,433
Reaction score
36,882
Location
Charlotte, NC
Me too! Again - I'm not expecting a 1st or a high 2nd, but considering some of the qb situations and the available options make me think that someone will bite. Maybe a 3rd?
I'm with you, I don't think it's a pipe dream considering how important QB is. I could see the Jets trading a 3rd and a 6th, and using a second on a young guy.
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,669
Reaction score
3,424
Location
Charleston, SC
It really should depend on what the new coach wants. I don't anticipate getting an unconditional second. A third with conditions is probably the best that can be gotten if that is the direction the next coach desires.
Big assumption there....that we'll actually find a new coach...
 

HerefortheCards

Pretty Prince of Parties
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Posts
11,967
Reaction score
8,808
Location
Reno, NV
Any trade that takes on the contract is a good trade for the Cards. Bidwill can swap personal assistants with another owner and if they take the contract….

:championship:
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,325
Reaction score
3,020
Location
Arizona
Me too! Again - I'm not expecting a 1st or a high 2nd, but considering some of the qb situations and the available options make me think that someone will bite. Maybe a 3rd?
Side note - I respect the fact you haven't changed your avatar in 24 years. I hate that I know it's Mean Joe Greene and Dave McGinnis in the photo too.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
20,999
Reaction score
22,857
Side note - I respect the fact you haven't changed your avatar in 24 years. I hate that I know it's Mean Joe Greene and Dave McGinnis in the photo too.
I unironically love coach Mac - I remember every time at training camp in Flag, he was the mayor - glad handing everyone, saying hi and he was such a great guy. I always think he missed his calling as a college football coach. What parents could say no to coach Mac!?! He's also kind of a spirit animal in the futility of the franchise. We have to try and laugh, right?
 

HerefortheCards

Pretty Prince of Parties
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Posts
11,967
Reaction score
8,808
Location
Reno, NV
I unironically love coach Mac - I remember every time at training camp in Flag, he was the mayor - glad handing everyone, saying hi and he was such a great guy. I always think he missed his calling as a college football coach. What parents could say no to coach Mac!?! He's also kind of a spirit animal in the futility of the franchise. We have to try and laugh, right?
All I can think of is that old Plummer commercial.

“He’s got a big heart.”
 

JosiahLee

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Posts
2,999
Reaction score
6,132
Location
Gilbert
The contract is a major deterrent. Not getting my hopes up. Until proven otherwise, I’m guessing they straight up have to cut him. I’m still stunned we got absolutely nothing for D Hop…NOTHING!
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,719
Reaction score
54,351
Location
Las Vegas
The contract is a major deterrent. Not getting my hopes up. Until proven otherwise, I’m guessing they straight up have to cut him. I’m still stunned we got absolutely nothing for D Hop…NOTHING!
I don’t really understand this line of thought. I was told by many on this exact board when Kyler signed his extension four years ago that in a few years, his contract would be considered peanuts. That it would be cheap amongst quarterbacks who are the highest paid in the league. Yet now everybody says it’s a deterrent four years later for a trade. Even with the Cardinals, probably going to have to pick up a portion. If a GM likes Kyler and thinks he’s a possible winning quarterback for their organization the contract shouldn’t matter. Especially one that is now “peanuts” this many years later right?
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,971
Reaction score
24,693
Location
Modesto, California
I don’t really understand this line of thought. I was told by many on this exact board when Kyler signed his extension four years ago that in a few years, his contract would be considered peanuts. That it would be cheap amongst quarterbacks who are the highest paid in the league. Yet now everybody says it’s a deterrent four years later for a trade. Even with the Cardinals, probably going to have to pick up a portion. If a GM likes Kyler and thinks he’s a possible winning quarterback for their organization the contract shouldn’t matter. Especially one that is now “peanuts” this many years later right?
Agree.
It's only an issue for any team whose cap is in such bad shape they can't afford to pay a starting QB.
The truth is...the new team will likely sign kyler to a new deal right away. A deal that fits their needs and provides them some flexibility in the first couple years.
They get kyler to agree by adding more bonus money and added years...but they include a team "out" after year two.
The Redbirds have to take the loss in a trade in the form of dead money.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,065
Reaction score
42,382
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I was told by many on this exact board when Kyler signed his extension four years ago that in a few years, his contract would be considered peanuts.
It’d be a bargain if he were a top 10-12 QB. Right now he looks like a bottom 10-12 QB and he hasn’t played like a top 1/3 QB since the back half of ‘23 in a real limited sample size.

His development curve just flattened and a bunch of QBs caught him from behind.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,413
Reaction score
33,044
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I don’t really understand this line of thought. I was told by many on this exact board when Kyler signed his extension four years ago that in a few years, his contract would be considered peanuts. That it would be cheap amongst quarterbacks who are the highest paid in the league. Yet now everybody says it’s a deterrent four years later for a trade. Even with the Cardinals, probably going to have to pick up a portion. If a GM likes Kyler and thinks he’s a possible winning quarterback for their organization the contract shouldn’t matter. Especially one that is now “peanuts” this many years later right?
Damn straight, Shane. That's why all those stans and homers who treated us like morons when we were shouting into the void that there was no reason to sign KM a year early should take a long walk off a short pier.
 

gimpy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Posts
3,890
Reaction score
3,759
Location
Flagstaff, Az
I don’t really understand this line of thought. I was told by many on this exact board when Kyler signed his extension four years ago that in a few years, his contract would be considered peanuts. That it would be cheap amongst quarterbacks who are the highest paid in the league. Yet now everybody says it’s a deterrent four years later for a trade. Even with the Cardinals, probably going to have to pick up a portion. If a GM likes Kyler and thinks he’s a possible winning quarterback for their organization the contract shouldn’t matter. Especially one that is now “peanuts” this many years later right?
You must have miss understood the term, "in a few years". They meant a long few (many) years versus a few (short ) years.
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,332,829
Posts
6,547,253
Members
6,431
Latest member
Arlene Lake
Top