Who’s our next qb?

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
There is significant financial differences between pick 3 and pick 30.
You want the 5th year of control in case the guy works out. But at the same time you want it for as little financial investment as possible.
Yes, but I doubt it is relevant. Also, it’s not my money, so I don’t care much about that. :)
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
I wouldn't. While Resse has some question marks, and I'm not advocating him at 3, he's a consensus top 5 talent and you'll be lucky to find Simpson inside anyone's top 15-20. That would be the definition of a reach. I guess if you're going to reach, a QB would be the position to do it. But what if Bailey/Reese/Bain turns out to be a Will Anderson type and then Monti will have passed on a
If the quarterback works out, there is no such thing as a reach. It is always worth it. And if you don't believe enough in Simpson, why would you use a first-round pick on him?
 
OP
OP
slanidrac16

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
If the quarterback works out, there is no such thing as a reach. It is always worth it. And if you don't believe enough in Simpson, why would you use a first-round pick on him?
We have been adding draft picks and it really hasn’t been working out.
I say go big or go home.

Free agency is the key. We must sign the best right tackle in free agency. In addition we have to sign a solid rb and there are a lot of them available.

With the #3 pick you take a game changer. Bailey is the guy. Pair him up with Sweat and we can reek havoc on Qb’s.

Now here’s the key. Unless Simpson totally lights it up at the combine or Mendoza falls to us which won’t happen, we can’t pass on a blue chip like Bailey. That means we have to get bold and move back up in the first round to get Simpson.

Yes Monti, we’ll have to give up some draft picks to get Simpson IF IF IF he is our guy. Otherwise we use our second pick for (fill in the name) qb.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
28,607
Reaction score
22,946
Location
The Giant Toaster
If the quarterback works out, there is no such thing as a reach. It is always worth it. And if you don't believe enough in Simpson, why would you use a first-round pick on him?
Depends how strongly they believe in him. It’s not an identical situation but in 2019 the Giants wanted Daniel Jones in a bad QB draft but couldn’t risk him falling to their next pick so they reached for him at #6. They were ultimately sold enough that he was their franchise guy (spoiler alert, he wasn’t).

Last year facing a similar situation they like Jaxson Dart but not enough to take him over Abdul Carter. They were able to move up in the last first rd and end up with both players. I think that’s more of the formula Monti will try to pull off.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,413
Reaction score
33,044
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Yes, but I doubt it is relevant. Also, it’s not my money, so I don’t care much about that. :)
Let's just say I hope Monti doesn't fall into this illogical trap. You are trying to galaxy brain a very simple situation. You aren't the smartest guy in the room and neither is Monti.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,413
Reaction score
33,044
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
If the quarterback works out, there is no such thing as a reach. It is always worth it. And if you don't believe enough in Simpson, why would you use a first-round pick on him?
You are so far gonzo on this topic there's probably not a way back for you lol
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
Free agency is the key. We must sign the best right tackle in free agency. In addition we have to sign a solid rb and there are a lot of them available.
Yes, you are right. If they don’t sign a top RT in free agency, there is no way I am going defense in the first round.
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
Last year facing a similar situation they like Jaxson Dart but not enough to take him over Abdul Carter. They were able to move up in the last first rd and end up with both players. I think that’s more of the formula Monti will try to pull off.
If someone else had taken Dart, and he ended up working out, the Giants had made a major mistake, no matter how good Carter will become. That is my point.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
22,542
Reaction score
10,691
If someone else had taken Dart, and he ended up working out, the Giants had made a major mistake, no matter how good Carter will become. That is my point.
But that didn't happen. Their GM knew when to make the deal. Same with the Ravens trading back into round 1 for Lamar.
You can play the what if game with any draft pick. What if they pass on Bailey and he goes on to become a premier pass rusher?
I'd rather take the better prospect and, if someone takes Simpson prior to making a deal, then I move on to next year's QB class.

If Simpson was a clean prospect, he'd be ranked right up there. The Jets need a QB every bit as much as the Cards, maybe more, and you don't see/hear any talk of them taking Simpson while there was plenty of talk about Moore until he decided to return to Oregon.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,694
Reaction score
48,826
Location
UK
Just putting this out there for when I'm right but I like Garrett Nussmeier.

I know his star has slipped after a season he played hurt and had some coaching issues, but at the start of this year he was generally considered the best QB in the draft. He's currently consensus pick #65 which I think is way too low. I think he will go late 1st or early 2nd.

Mendoza is the best QB in the draft but as an NFL ready prospect Nussmeier is 2nd for me. I think he's better than Simpson, Beck or Chambliss.

I'd really like if we could get him in the 2nd but I have a feeling that the Rams might take him late 1st.
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
But that didn't happen. Their GM knew when to make the deal. Same with the Ravens trading back into round 1 for Lamar.
You can play the what if game with any draft pick. What if they pass on Bailey and he goes on to become a premier pass rusher?
Sure, and the most simple solution is to take Simpson at #3 overall. How do we know that there are not several other teams that are kicking themselves because they lost out on Dart and Jackson?

I'd rather take the better prospect and, if someone takes Simpson prior to making a deal, then I move on to next year's QB class.
Well, this might be the biggest reason why fans disagree in this. I am not willing to wait a year. I am tired of embarrassment, and I don’t want to punt on the season a long time before the games even start. Obviously I can be forced to.

By the way, I am not saying I would not be okay with a mediocre season, as long as they are competitive. Maybe that is with Brissett, a second day draft pick, or somehow else. That might be okay.

If Simpson was a clean prospect, he'd be ranked right up there. The Jets need a QB every bit as much as the Cards, maybe more, and you don't see/hear any talk of them taking Simpson while there was plenty of talk about Moore until he decided to return to Oregon.
Give it time. The analysts could easily rank him that high when the draft comes closer.
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
8,059
Reaction score
8,175
Location
Gilbert
Views on all these qb’s are going to change after the combine. All these qb’s will probably move up the board.
Happens every single year. We all get so focused on the QBs in the CFB Playoffs - there's going to be some small school dudes who impress at the combine.
 

Adrian

Ronin forever
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
171,285
Reaction score
83,974
Location
Crowley, TX
According to PFSN, the team is projected to select Carson Beck in the upcoming selection process. It is the kind of prediction that doesn’t scream inevitability, but lingers all the same, growing louder the longer Murray’s future remains unresolved.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
11,068
Reaction score
14,403
Location
York, PA
Heard rumors that QB Carr might come out of retirement for the right situation. Would the Cardinals go that route & then draft a QB like Simpson or Beck & let them sit for a year or two? Never been a Carr fan, but he’s better than Brissett. Or is he?
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
8,467
Reaction score
8,577
Location
Avondale, AZ
Heard rumors that QB Carr might come out of retirement for the right situation. Would the Cardinals go that route & then draft a QB like Simpson or Beck & let them sit for a year or two? Never been a Carr fan, but he’s better than Brissett. Or is he?
I would say marginally. He's prone to the turnover at the worst possible time like Brissett is sometimes. Plus, he's kind of been busted up the last couple of years. So, I would hope against that.
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
4,407
Reaction score
10,946
Location
Orange County, CA
Heard rumors that QB Carr might come out of retirement for the right situation. Would the Cardinals go that route & then draft a QB like Simpson or Beck & let them sit for a year or two? Never been a Carr fan, but he’s better than Brissett. Or is he?
You think the Cardinals would be the "right situation" to lure Carr out of retirement?!
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
11,068
Reaction score
14,403
Location
York, PA
You think the Cardinals would be the "right situation" to lure Carr out of retirement?!
Once Murray is gone, we’ll be in desperation mode, especially if Bidwill expects to turn this around quickly like he says he is. Outside of Mendoza, no QB coming out of this draft will be ready to start an NFL game. But, can anyone trust what comes out Bidwill’s mouth?
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,471
Reaction score
848
Sure, and the most simple solution is to take Simpson at #3 overall. How do we know that there are not several other teams that are kicking themselves because they lost out on Dart and Jackson?


Well, this might be the biggest reason why fans disagree in this. I am not willing to wait a year. I am tired of embarrassment, and I don’t want to punt on the season a long time before the games even start. Obviously I can be forced to.

By the way, I am not saying I would not be okay with a mediocre season, as long as they are competitive. Maybe that is with Brissett, a second day draft pick, or somehow else. That might be okay.


Give it time. The analysts could easily rank him that high when the draft comes closer.
The jets probably think they can get him at 16. ……also heard a rumor the Steelers love Simpson….if lafleur wants him at 3 he will be the pick
 

GeorgiaCard88

All Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2023
Posts
890
Reaction score
2,422
Location
Georgia
Just putting this out there for when I'm right but I like Garrett Nussmeier.

I know his star has slipped after a season he played hurt and had some coaching issues, but at the start of this year he was generally considered the best QB in the draft. He's currently consensus pick #65 which I think is way too low. I think he will go late 1st or early 2nd.

Mendoza is the best QB in the draft but as an NFL ready prospect Nussmeier is 2nd for me. I think he's better than Simpson, Beck or Chambliss.

I'd really like if we could get him in the 2nd but I have a feeling that the Rams might take him late 1st.
Im down with this. He was a really highly ranked draft pick going into this season and ultimately unfolded into a bad situation.

If we blew a second round pick on him- it wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world to recover from.
 
Top