Who’s our next qb?

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
43,352
Reaction score
31,024
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Simpson will not last until the second round. Some team will take him in the middle or end of round one. He seems like he'd be a good choice for the Rams at 13, the Jets at 16, the Steelers at 21, or the Browns at 24.
They are more than welcome to overdraft him.

I still say let's tempt the Stillers into believing a slightly used K1 is a good bet :)
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
78,473
Reaction score
33,474
Location
Killjoy Central
The guys in vid I posted said he is like kyler with less arm strength but with every intangible(leadership, toughness, no ego, clutch)
I think Steve Keim just liked to draft short dudes for some reason. Hindsight is 20/20 but I bet a proper interview may have led to not drafting KM number one overall. Brief college career and not really leader material according to others who played with him.
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,619
Reaction score
4,295
Location
Denmark
The Senior Bowl starts next week, and I would advise you to at least focus a little on the quarterbacks, since one of them could realistically be in the squad for next season.

Sawyer Robinson has been a personal favorite all season. He might be one of the best throwers in the draft, but he makes too many bad decisions. He has a chance to develop into a good starter.

Cole Payton is another of my a-little-under-the-radar favorites. He is a long-term project, but certainly an interesting one. He plays for North Dakota State, but has only been a starter for one season, even though he is a fifth year senior. He is reminiscent of Baker Mayfield.

Taylen Green has all the talent in the world, but unfortunately he couldn’t hit the water from the beach. Could be an intriguing practice squad developmental guy.

The director of the event has said that they have extended open invitations to two more quarterbacks, but it is a secret who it is. Based on rumors, likely one of them is Carson Beck which would certainly be interesting.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
22,248
Reaction score
9,769
Not sure if they'll retain him but Connor Senger of the Cards is the OC in the East-West Shrine game. Should get some good insight. They have until Feb. 1 to decide to keep him or not.
 
OP
OP
slanidrac16

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,136
Reaction score
20,920
Location
Plainfield, Il.
The Senior Bowl starts next week, and I would advise you to at least focus a little on the quarterbacks, since one of them could realistically be in the squad for next season.

Sawyer Robinson has been a personal favorite all season. He might be one of the best throwers in the draft, but he makes too many bad decisions. He has a chance to develop into a good starter.

Cole Payton is another of my a-little-under-the-radar favorites. He is a long-term project, but certainly an interesting one. He plays for North Dakota State, but has only been a starter for one season, even though he is a fifth year senior. He is reminiscent of Baker Mayfield.

Taylen Green has all the talent in the world, but unfortunately he couldn’t hit the water from the beach. Could be an intriguing practice squad developmental guy.

The director of the event has said that they have extended open invitations to two more quarterbacks, but it is a secret who it is. Based on rumors, likely one of them is Carson Beck which would certainly be interesting.
As always, I Appreciate the post and info. However, our needs are now. Worrying about developing potential at this point is way down on my list. Any potential qb for us is going to be a second round pick and not some 5th/6th round stab in the dark.
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,619
Reaction score
4,295
Location
Denmark
As always, I Appreciate the post and info. However, our needs are now. Worrying about developing potential at this point is way down on my list. Any potential qb for us is going to be a second round pick and not some 5th/6th round stab in the dark.
I would actually prefer both. Anyway, I agree that it is about here and now, but I don't think there is any obvious solution to that. I really like Ty Simpson, but it is a gamble to take him at #3, and he will be gone at #34. Right now, I think it makes sense to bring in more than one new QB - simply throwing darts - and that is why I think it could be relevant to study guys that will get drafted on day two or three.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,262
Reaction score
574
I would actually prefer both. Anyway, I agree that it is about here and now, but I don't think there is any obvious solution to that. I really like Ty Simpson, but it is a gamble to take him at #3, and he will be gone at #34. Right now, I think it makes sense to bring in more than one new QB - simply throwing darts - and that is why I think it could be relevant to study guys that will get drafted on day two or three.
Could mills win here if we go o line at 3 and beef up the run game? Or do you prefer Bailey and say…dunker? …and mills or a nuss? ….
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,262
Reaction score
574
I would actually prefer both. Anyway, I agree that it is about here and now, but I don't think there is any obvious solution to that. I really like Ty Simpson, but it is a gamble to take him at #3, and he will be gone at #34. Right now, I think it makes sense to bring in more than one new QB - simply throwing darts - and that is why I think it could be relevant to study guys that will get drafted on day two or three.
I seen a trade I liked…we give jets Kyler…and 34 plus a 2027 third for pick 16…we get Simpson at 16
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,619
Reaction score
4,295
Location
Denmark
Could mills win here if we go o line at 3 and beef up the run game? Or do you prefer Bailey and say…dunker? …and mills or a nuss? ….
I am sorry, DGF, but I am not sure who Mills and Dunker are. :) Anyway, right now there is absolutely 0% chance that I would even consider to go defense at #3 - primarily because of last offseason, but also because of what the team needs the most. I am well aware that opinions will change before the draft (it’s just how the process works), but right now I am debating between Mauigoa and Simpson at #3.

And yes, I agree that your trade scenario would be wonderful.
 
OP
OP
slanidrac16

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,136
Reaction score
20,920
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Could mills win here if we go o line at 3 and beef up the run game? Or do you prefer Bailey and say…dunker? …and mills or a nuss? ….
Sign the best free agent RT and RB in free agency.
Take Bailey with the #3 pick. Trade the second pick + to move into the first round and draft Simpson.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
22,873
Reaction score
22,986
Location
Modesto, California
As always, I Appreciate the post and info. However, our needs are now. Worrying about developing potential at this point is way down on my list. Any potential qb for us is going to be a second round pick and not some 5th/6th round stab in the dark.
no matter where we pick a QB we need to have someone on the roster who can properly develop him.
otherwise we are screwed.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
22,873
Reaction score
22,986
Location
Modesto, California
I would actually prefer both. Anyway, I agree that it is about here and now, but I don't think there is any obvious solution to that. I really like Ty Simpson, but it is a gamble to take him at #3, and he will be gone at #34. Right now, I think it makes sense to bring in more than one new QB - simply throwing darts - and that is why I think it could be relevant to study guys that will get drafted on day two or three.
there are a few QB's that I would use 34 and trade back into round 1 to pick.
that 5th year of control is more important with QB's than other positions.

so if you want Simpson...dont think "will he be there at 34?"...think. "will he be there at 28?"...because 28-32 is the range to trade back to
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,954
Reaction score
14,079
Location
York, PA
I am sorry, DGF, but I am not sure who Mills and Dunker are. :) Anyway, right now there is absolutely 0% chance that I would even consider to go defense at #3 - primarily because of last offseason, but also because of what the team needs the most. I am well aware that opinions will change before the draft (it’s just how the process works), but right now I am debating between Mauigoa and Simpson at #3.

And yes, I agree that your trade scenario would be wonderful.
Simpson at 3???? Lol. I wouldn’t be surprised though. Only because I’ve been watching these moron Bidwills make choices like that for 62 years now!
 
OP
OP
slanidrac16

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,136
Reaction score
20,920
Location
Plainfield, Il.
there are a few QB's that I would use 34 and trade back into round 1 to pick.
that 5th year of control is more important with QB's than other positions.

so if you want Simpson...dont think "will he be there at 34?"...think. "will he be there at 28?"...because 28-32 is the range to trade back to
Yes
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,619
Reaction score
4,295
Location
Denmark
so if you want Simpson...dont think "will he be there at 34?"...think. "will he be there at 28?"...because 28-32 is the range to trade back to
I disagree a bit. If you are willing to spend a first-round pick on a quarterback, why are you not willing to spend the #3 pick on him? I obviously understand it would be great to take Simpson later, but it is the NFL. QB’s are drafted high, especially if their upside is as big as Simpson’s. Also, what if you lose him? Is that just okay, even though you thought he was worthy of a first-round pick? Maybe it is. Like you, I also have some ideas for #34, which is why I am debating with myself. :)

However, I also know that everyone’s opinion could easily change, so maybe I am more sure in late April.
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,619
Reaction score
4,295
Location
Denmark
Simpson at 3???? Lol. I wouldn’t be surprised though. Only because I’ve been watching these moron Bidwills make choices like that for 62 years now!
If you question taking him at #3, then you don’t want Simpson. It is just how it works. Ideally, I would like him later in the first round, but not only do QB’s simply get pushed up, but especially this offseason, the demand for QB’s is way bigger than the supply.

Further, you need to look at the context when evaluating Simpson. I have never seen a worse Alabama offense since I started following the NCAA about 20 years ago. Horrible offensive line, no running game, receivers consistently dropping balls. They got to the playoffs because of Simpson. He won games for them. When you are evaluating college quarterbacks, the first thing you should do is to just notice if he is the best player on the field, and Simpson was that. Immediately that makes him intriguing.

Having said that, this thread is about the quarterback next season and not specifically about evaluating Simpson, so I want to mention that I see other possibilities being to draft someone at #34 (I expect Carson Beck to be drafted around there), signing Malik Willis (probably most likely if they get Mike LaFleur), or simply to go with Brissett (a top 5-7 backup QB in the NFL). The idea that you would use a first-round pick on Simpson and then let him sit and learn for a year is ignorant. Sure, it would be ideal, but history should have taught people something, in my mind.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
22,873
Reaction score
22,986
Location
Modesto, California
I disagree a bit. If you are willing to spend a first-round pick on a quarterback, why are you not willing to spend the #3 pick on him? I obviously understand it would be great to take Simpson later, but it is the NFL. QB’s are drafted high, especially if their upside is as big as Simpson’s. Also, what if you lose him? Is that just okay, even though you thought he was worthy of a first-round pick? Maybe it is. Like you, I also have some ideas for #34, which is why I am debating with myself. :)

However, I also know that everyone’s opinion could easily change, so maybe I am more sure in late April.
There is significant financial differences between pick 3 and pick 30.
You want the 5th year of control in case the guy works out. But at the same time you want it for as little financial investment as possible.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,262
Reaction score
574
If you question taking him at #3, then you don’t want Simpson. It is just how it works. Ideally, I would like him later in the first round, but not only do QB’s simply get pushed up, but especially this offseason, the demand for QB’s is way bigger than the supply.

Further, you need to look at the context when evaluating Simpson. I have never seen a worse Alabama offense since I started following the NCAA about 20 years ago. Horrible offensive line, no running game, receivers consistently dropping balls. They got to the playoffs because of Simpson. He won games for them. When you are evaluating college quarterbacks, the first thing you should do is to just notice if he is the best player on the field, and Simpson was that. Immediately that makes him intriguing.

Having said that, this thread is about the quarterback next season and not specifically about evaluating Simpson, so I want to mention that I see other possibilities being to draft someone at #34 (I expect Carson Beck to be drafted around there), signing Malik Willis (probably most likely if they get Mike LaFleur), or simply to go with Brissett (a top 5-7 backup QB in the NFL). The idea that you would use a first-round pick on Simpson and then let him sit and learn for a year is ignorant. Sure, it would be ideal, but history should have taught people something, in my mind.
I will say this if we are gonna gamble I would take Simpson over Reese at 3 any day
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
22,248
Reaction score
9,769
I will say this if we are gonna gamble I would take Simpson over Reese at 3 any day
I wouldn't. While Resse has some question marks, and I'm not advocating him at 3, he's a consensus top 5 talent and you'll be lucky to find Simpson inside anyone's top 15-20. That would be the definition of a reach. I guess if you're going to reach, a QB would be the position to do it. But what if Bailey/Reese/Bain turns out to be a Will Anderson type and then Monti will have passed on a premier pass rusher twice.
I like the idea of picking at 3 and then trading back later into round 1 and getting Simpson. Sure, it comes with risk but it's Monti's job to be able read the tea leaves and know when to make a move. That was Keim's flaw in the draft, staying put and hoping the player they want falls to them.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,616
Posts
6,258,949
Members
6,415
Latest member
ABR
Back
Top