OT: Las Vegas Raiders WR Henry Ruggs to be charged with DUI resulting in death

Shane

Current STAR
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
66,247
Reaction score
32,475
Location
Las Vegas
A person often incriminates themselves because they think they have to talk to police when they don't other than give insurance, license and registration information for a vehicle.

I'm sure a huge number of cases are made long before Miranda Warnings are given. Police can even lie if they want.
If someone incriminates themself that’s a problem how? If they did so voluntarily and weren’t coerced or wasn’t beaten out of them? What’s your issue with it? Someone admitting guilt doesn’t seem like a bad thing to me?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,127
Reaction score
52,625
Don’t know why someone would say something to incriminate themselves if they’re not guilty and no interrogation has commenced . . .

If you are a suspect in a crime it's best to get a criminal lawyer. Police are talking to you for a reason. Even an innocent statement can be used against you.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,127
Reaction score
52,625
If someone incriminates themself that’s a problem how? If they did so voluntarily and weren’t coerced or wasn’t beaten out of them? What’s your issue with it? Someone admitting guilt doesn’t seem like a bad thing to me?

I have a problem with how the confession is obtained.

IMO, when police are investigating someone for a felony, that person should be given their Miranda Warnings upfront.

Don't you think the average citizen should know what you know concerning their rights?

Most people talk to police because they think they have too.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,127
Reaction score
52,625
What are you talking about? The black box is part of your vehicles airbag system. That’s his point.

That's an issue. Without consent, maybe the only data that should be collected is to deploy the airbags.
 

Luciano

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Dec 24, 2017
Posts
4,436
Reaction score
4,493
Location
Los Angeles
This is an example of losing individual freedoms.
All cars sold after 2014 must have one. It’s a NHTSA requirement.
Is not a new thing, GM started using them in 1994, they wanted data on how the car behaved before a crash.

Car companies collect all sort of data from your car, gps, speed, driving habits.

This is from GM “onstar” but everyone does it.

· Information about your vehicle, like the vehicle’s identification number (“VIN”), its make, model and year;

· Information about your vehicle’s condition, like diagnostic data, odometer readings, oil life remaining, tire pressure, fuel economy;

· Information about whenyour vehicleis refueled or recharged;

· Information that might indicate that your vehicle has been broken into or stolen, like glass breakage or ignition switch activity if your vehicle is equipped to detect those things;

· Information about apps that are pre-installed on the OnStar equipment, including the version of those apps;

· Information about the OnStar equipment, including the version of the OnStar software installed on that equipment;

· Information aboutwhen your vehicle’s ignition is on or off; and

· Information about collisions involving your vehicle, like the direction from which impact happened and which air bags deployed.



“Driving Information” includes:

· Information like the location of your vehicle, the GPS speed of your vehicle, your safety belt usage, and other similar information about how the vehicle is used.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,127
Reaction score
52,625
All cars sold after 2014 must have one. It’s a NHTSA requirement.
Is not a new thing, GM started using them in 1994, they wanted data on how the car behaved before a crash.

Car companies collect all sort of data from your car, gps, speed, driving habits.

This is from GM “onstar” but everyone does it.

· Information about your vehicle, like the vehicle’s identification number (“VIN”), its make, model and year;

· Information about your vehicle’s condition, like diagnostic data, odometer readings, oil life remaining, tire pressure, fuel economy;

· Information about whenyour vehicleis refueled or recharged;

· Information that might indicate that your vehicle has been broken into or stolen, like glass breakage or ignition switch activity if your vehicle is equipped to detect those things;

· Information about apps that are pre-installed on the OnStar equipment, including the version of those apps;

· Information about the OnStar equipment, including the version of the OnStar software installed on that equipment;

· Information aboutwhen your vehicle’s ignition is on or off; and

· Information about collisions involving your vehicle, like the direction from which impact happened and which air bags deployed.



“Driving Information” includes:

· Information like the location of your vehicle, the GPS speed of your vehicle, your safety belt usage, and other similar information about how the vehicle is used.

Our whole life is in a computer somewhere and it's used somehow, someway to profit or save money.
 

Shane

Current STAR
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
66,247
Reaction score
32,475
Location
Las Vegas
I have a problem with how the confession is obtained.

IMO, when police are investigating someone for a felony, that person should be given their Miranda Warnings upfront.

Don't you think the average citizen should know what you know concerning their rights?

Most people talk to police because they think they have too.
In today’s day and age most average citizens I would say do know their rights.... Now obviously there are exceptions. Most people I dealt with over a career knew exactly what their rights were and to shut up. The Supreme Court laid out reasonable guidelines imo.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,127
Reaction score
52,625
In today’s day and age most average citizens I would say do know their rights.... Now obviously there are exceptions. Most people I dealt with over a career knew exactly what their rights were and to shut up. The Supreme Court laid out reasonable guidelines imo.

I agree the Miranda Warnings are more than fair. However, I believe police are more sophisticated these days in gathering information before the rights are given.

Now it seems like police have most of the information they need before they are administered.

Watch some of some real life police programs (including game & fish) and tell me what you think. I don't see a lot of savvy citizens out there.
 
Last edited:

speedy

the medic
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Posts
2,180
Reaction score
2,204
Location
Glendale
Our whole life is in a computer somewhere and it's used somehow, someway to profit or save money.
It’s called your “buyer profile.” I actually may have knowledge of a private company that is writing software to track persons based on their buyer profile/unique device serial numbers associated with said buyer profile. From there, people with the software will be able to track your physical movements through through the different IP addresses your device(s) came within range of. It’s not live tracking, but the “bread crumbs” are all captured by the software. 100% legal and doesn’t require a warrant/other court action.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,127
Reaction score
52,625
It’s called your “buyer profile.” I actually may have knowledge of a private company that is writing software to track persons based on their buyer profile/unique device serial numbers associated with said buyer profile. From there, people with the software will be able to track your physical movements through through the different IP addresses your device(s) came within range of. It’s not live tracking, but the “bread crumbs” are all captured by the software. 100% legal and doesn’t require a warrant/other court action.

I just bought a new computer and I felt I had to give away my personal life in order to access it.

Those artificial intelligence movies are not far off base.
 

gimpy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Posts
3,073
Reaction score
2,581
Location
Flagstaff, Az
You have to have insurance under the law so it's a catch 22.

A person may have to give up their right to self incrimination by a "black box" if you have to drive to make a living.
Well, I don't think Native Americans have to have insurance, as long as they stay on the reservation? :whip:
 

Devilmaycare

Chief Brah Officer
Moderator
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Posts
6,225
Reaction score
8,760
Location
Scottsdale
All cars sold after 2014 must have one. It’s a NHTSA requirement.
Is not a new thing, GM started using them in 1994, they wanted data on how the car behaved before a crash.

Car companies collect all sort of data from your car, gps, speed, driving habits.

This is from GM “onstar” but everyone does it.

· Information about your vehicle, like the vehicle’s identification number (“VIN”), its make, model and year;

· Information about your vehicle’s condition, like diagnostic data, odometer readings, oil life remaining, tire pressure, fuel economy;

· Information about whenyour vehicleis refueled or recharged;

· Information that might indicate that your vehicle has been broken into or stolen, like glass breakage or ignition switch activity if your vehicle is equipped to detect those things;

· Information about apps that are pre-installed on the OnStar equipment, including the version of those apps;

· Information about the OnStar equipment, including the version of the OnStar software installed on that equipment;

· Information aboutwhen your vehicle’s ignition is on or off; and

· Information about collisions involving your vehicle, like the direction from which impact happened and which air bags deployed.



“Driving Information” includes:

· Information like the location of your vehicle, the GPS speed of your vehicle, your safety belt usage, and other similar information about how the vehicle is used.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg for OnStar. Since he was driving a Corvette it most likely had it in it. After working as a dev for GM for a bit I'll never had a car with OnStar in it. It's a bit scary what it knows and has access to in your car. Security on it wasn't as high as I'd like to have seen either. Pretty much if I knew your VIN I had full access to your system. If I was ever to buy a GM, I do like the C8s, I would insist on a build without it and if I had no choice on it the first thing I'd do is fry the cell modem.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,073
Reaction score
11,853
Location
Las Vegas, NV
And that's just the tip of the iceberg for OnStar. Since he was driving a Corvette it most likely had it in it. After working as a dev for GM for a bit I'll never had a car with OnStar in it. It's a bit scary what it knows and has access to in your car. Security on it wasn't as high as I'd like to have seen either. Pretty much if I knew your VIN I had full access to your system. If I was ever to buy a GM, I do like the C8s, I would insist on a build without it and if I had no choice on it the first thing I'd do is fry the cell modem.
Sending you a PM, haha.
 

tnmike

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Posts
1,397
Reaction score
1,535
Location
Nashville, TN
And that's just the tip of the iceberg for OnStar. Since he was driving a Corvette it most likely had it in it. After working as a dev for GM for a bit I'll never had a car with OnStar in it. It's a bit scary what it knows and has access to in your car. Security on it wasn't as high as I'd like to have seen either. Pretty much if I knew your VIN I had full access to your system. If I was ever to buy a GM, I do like the C8s, I would insist on a build without it and if I had no choice on it the first thing I'd do is fry the cell modem.
You don't get that choice
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,732
Reaction score
13,001
Location
Albq
Hyundai Blue Link found my wife's car when it got stolen.
Something I did not know, Blue Link will let you know they located your vehicle but they won't tell you where it is. They give the police that info. They don't want you trying to go get it yourself and somebody ends up dead.
 

Shane

Current STAR
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
66,247
Reaction score
32,475
Location
Las Vegas
Hyundai Blue Link found my wife's car when it got stolen.
Something I did not know, Blue Link will let you know they located your vehicle but they won't tell you where it is. They give the police that info. They don't want you trying to go get it yourself and somebody ends up dead.
What does Hyundai charge for the service
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,732
Reaction score
13,001
Location
Albq
What does Hyundai charge for the service

I think it's like $300 a year.. not sure if that includes the navigation system. Don't need navigation anymore with Google maps on the cell phone. We got some kind of small discount on car insurance because we have it.

btw, it's a 2012 and it only has 30K miles on it. It's just driven by a little old lady to the country club and back..lol
 

Shane

Current STAR
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
66,247
Reaction score
32,475
Location
Las Vegas
I think it's like $300 a year.. not sure if that includes the navigation system. Don't need navigation anymore with Google maps on the cell phone. We got some kind of small discount on car insurance because we have it.

btw, it's a 2012 and it only has 30K miles on it. It's just driven by a little old lady to the country club and back..lol
I gotcha.... that’s awesome only 30k
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
60,550
Reaction score
52,442
Location
SoCal
You have to have insurance under the law so it's a catch 22.

A person may have to give up their right to self incrimination by a "black box" if you have to drive to make a living.
That’s not how legal rights work. For instance, you don’t have a right to even drive.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
60,550
Reaction score
52,442
Location
SoCal
Regarding black boxes in cars and your rights. I found this very helpful article with state by state requirements. In Nevada, it's disclosed at the time of sale/lease, that the black box is installed.

Interesting. So 13 states have created some limited statutes. Disclosure seems appropriate, but otherwise I think that’s bad policy. If I were the manufacturer I’d want that data to protect me from frivolous product manufacturer lawsuits and if I were an insurance company I’d want that to limit liability coverage.

Without having read each statute, I’ll bet you can contract around the language and I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the case in car contracts and insurance policies moving forward.
 
Top