Rumor: Lakers Seeking Sign & Trade for CP3

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
Honestly, just not giving him to the Lakers to improve their roster is more of a benefit than getting anything they would offer in return. Let CP3 walk if that's really how he feels. Lakers can't sign him outright.

The Suns released Tyson Chandler to go to the Lakers and even traded Steve Nash to them. Just saying.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
44,675
Reaction score
14,116
Location
Round Rock, TX
The Suns released Tyson Chandler to go to the Lakers and even traded Steve Nash to them. Just saying.
LOL

You're comparing Chris Paul to a broken down Steve Nash and Tyson Chandler? We're not going to trade a good to great player to the Lakers.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
LOL

You're comparing Chris Paul to a broken down Steve Nash and Tyson Chandler? We're not going to trade a good to great player to the Lakers.

Don't say something I didn't say.

I'm pointing out past moves the Suns have made which conceivably could have helped the Lakers.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
44,675
Reaction score
14,116
Location
Round Rock, TX
Don't say something I didn't say.

I'm pointing out past moves the Suns have made which conceivably could have helped the Lakers.
But they didn't. We made the moves because we didn't care that it was the Lakers. In this case, we WOULD care. Do you dispute that?
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
20,906
Reaction score
13,586
Never going to happen in a million years. Good luck with Westbrook, LeBron.

and why would Washington trade Westbrook for that package? Keep in mind the Lakers have no picks to give
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
59,876
Reaction score
51,168
Location
SoCal
The Suns released Tyson Chandler to go to the Lakers and even traded Steve Nash to them. Just saying.
Those suns teams (a) had those guys for at least a few years, (b) those guys were at the very very very VERY end of their careers, (c) we weren’t really a legit contender and thus the lakers weren’t a legit threat to us, and (d) EFF the lakers.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
11,761
Reaction score
9,352
I have to say all the Lakers have is KCP and Kuzma as movable contracts both around 15 million per.

Those are both bad contracts, I don't want either player at those salaries.

So honestly I would rather we let him walk than do that deal, and there is no reason to help Chris Paul out if he desires to go to the Lakers.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
11,761
Reaction score
9,352
Schroder's trash too. I would much rather resign Cam Payne and play him as starter than go with Schroder.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
11,761
Reaction score
9,352
The Suns released Tyson Chandler to go to the Lakers and even traded Steve Nash to them. Just saying.

And arguably the Suns got the better end of both those deals - actually in the case of Nash it's not even arguable.

Lakers will not get to rip us off just because they are the Lakers.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
Those suns teams (a) had those guys for at least a few years, (b) those guys were at the very very very VERY end of their careers, (c) we weren’t really a legit contender and thus the lakers weren’t a legit threat to us, and (d) EFF the lakers.

It doesn't change that it happened. I'm guessing you remember the uproar about Nash playing for the Lakers.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
But they didn't. We made the moves because we didn't care that it was the Lakers. In this case, we WOULD care. Do you dispute that?

I'm talking past history.

What if Paul going to the Lakers had the same outcome of Nash going to the Lakers?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
And arguably the Suns got the better end of both those deals - actually in the case of Nash it's not even arguable.

Lakers will not get to rip us off just because they are the Lakers.

Don't you think at the time it happened, the Lakers thought they were getting the best end of the deal?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
59,876
Reaction score
51,168
Location
SoCal
It doesn't change that it happened. I'm guessing you remember the uproar about Nash playing for the Lakers.
Yeah I don’t recall it being an uproar when we found out we got multiple first round picks. I remember people being mad nash wanted to play for them. But night and day different facts and circumstances from that to this.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
11,761
Reaction score
9,352
Don't you think at the time it happened, the Lakers thought they were getting the best end of the deal?

Maybe. But I think that Suns management knew better. Both were broken down shells of their prior self, and the Suns knew it.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
Yeah I don’t recall it being an uproar when we found out we got multiple first round picks. I remember people being mad nash wanted to play for them. But night and day different facts and circumstances from that to this.

I'm just saying the Suns have exhibited this type of behavior before... helping a rival.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
44,675
Reaction score
14,116
Location
Round Rock, TX
I'm just saying the Suns have exhibited this type of behavior before... helping a rival.
Were the Lakers really a rival back then? Even if Nash could have helped them, it wouldn't have happened while we were a threat. And that turned out to be true. We just made it to the Finals. Talk about completely different circumstances.
 

Raze

Suns fan since '89
Joined
May 20, 2017
Posts
626
Reaction score
599
Location
Arizona
Three way trade:

Phx gets Dame Lillard
LAL get Chris Paul on a S&T
Portland gets Anthony Davis

Throw in the necessary change to balance out the trade.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
Three way trade:

Phx gets Dame Lillard
LAL get Chris Paul on a S&T
Portland gets Anthony Davis

Throw in the necessary change to balance out the trade.

I haven't checked out the particulars but I think the Lakers and Trail Blazers could do business without the Suns. The Lakers would likely prefer Lillard.
 

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
4,721
Reaction score
5,311
Lakers aren't interested in anything resembling a fair trade for anybody. They think they are basically entitled to get other teams stars for basically nothing in return. It's what they have been able to do for decades, and they absolutely believe it's their God-given privilege to endlessly do so.

So, if Paul really has any genuine desire to force his way there, expect the Lakers to offer something like Gasol, Caruso, and a future second... and say take it or leave it.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
Lakers aren't interested in anything resembling a fair trade for anybody. They think they are basically entitled to get other teams stars for basically nothing in return. It's what they have been able to do for decades, and they absolutely believe it's their God-given privilege to endlessly do so.

So, if Paul really has any genuine desire to force his way there, expect the Lakers to offer something like Gasol, Caruso, and a future second... and say take it or leave it.

I know what you are saying but the salaries will not work.
 

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
4,721
Reaction score
5,311
I haven't checked out the particulars but I think the Lakers and Trail Blazers could do business without the Suns. The Lakers would likely prefer Lillard.

Probably, but I don't think the Blazers want any of the junk the Lakers would offer (hint - no way it's Davis)... and Lillard can't (and doesn't seem inclined to) forcing his way there.

Whereas, Paul... who knows?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
Probably, but I don't think the Blazers want any of the junk the Lakers would offer (hint - no way it's Davis)... and Lillard can't (and doesn't seem inclined to) forcing his way there.

Whereas, Paul... who knows?

Someone had Davis in the trade.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
112,537
Reaction score
51,770
Were the Lakers really a rival back then? Even if Nash could have helped them, it wouldn't have happened while we were a threat. And that turned out to be true. We just made it to the Finals. Talk about completely different circumstances.

What I pointed out actually happened and the Lakers are in the Western Conference.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,096
Reaction score
60,376
Man... we really need something to talk about that not what happened in the Finals, huh?
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
534,761
Posts
5,246,044
Members
6,273
Latest member
sarahmoose
Top