Round 1

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
38,142
Reaction score
20,955
Location
SoCal
I’m okay with trading down if none of the top 3 CBs are still on the board. I see round 1 like this,

Horne/Farley
Harris (pass on Etienne)
Smith/Waddle/Toney
Assume Harris and kadarious are trade back candidates?
 

Minski

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Posts
852
Reaction score
1,120
Location
Gloucester, UK
Starting to think we just take Harris at 16. Having a legit threat on the ground as well as Murray will just make both players so much better. In a chess game it seems the logical choice. Who gives a crap if the league doesn’t think RBs should be taken that high anymore. You have to work with what you’ve got and improve what you haven’t got
 

juza76

Registered
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
10,747
Reaction score
4,960
Location
milan-italy
No please no rb
We are not in position to draft one early
Just if we trade back and getting an additional second or third round pick
If Harris is in the second ok, but no in the first
The recent past should tell u how isn't wise drafting one earlier
 
Last edited:

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
9,707
Reaction score
8,341
Location
Las Vegas, NV
I'd love to trade down in almost all cases besides Patrick Surtain being there, but I don't know if we'll have any dance partners unless a QB drops.

I want this draft to go CB/RB or RB/CB in the first two rounds barring a complete shock of a drop at WR or TE.
 

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
11,665
Reaction score
5,153
maybe too fine a distinction

im fine with Najee in the 20s and later

16 is too high

i have no issue with a first round RB if he is a true difference maker -- 5 years of inexpensive control
 

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
11,665
Reaction score
5,153
my combo platter for rounds 1 and 2:

a CB
an offensive weapon

order doesnt matter
 

DVontel

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
7,387
Reaction score
8,328
No linemen?
Newsome not an option?
Yea, I would still draft Newsome at 16. The gap between him & the other 3 is not large, if at all. Durability is my main concern, though.


I’ll be damned if we trade back just to end up still taking a RB.
 

DVontel

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
7,387
Reaction score
8,328
Starting to think we just take Harris at 16. Having a legit threat on the ground as well as Murray will just make both players so much better. In a chess game it seems the logical choice. Who gives a crap if the league doesn’t think RBs should be taken that high anymore. You have to work with what you’ve got and improve what you haven’t got
Guess it actually gotta happen to this fanbase to see why you don’t anymore.
 
Last edited:

BritCard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
5,840
Reaction score
5,961
Location
UK
I’m okay with trading down if none of the top 3 CBs are still on the board. I see round 1 like this,

Horne/Farley
Harris (pass on Etienne)
Smith/Waddle/Toney

Toney? There's a whole bunch of guys I'd take over him. I'd bet my right nut Toney doesn't even go round 1.

WR in round one would be silly IMO. There's a whole bunch of quality guys in round 2.

I'd have OLB as more likely in #1 than WR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJ1

Chris_Sanders

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
29,150
Reaction score
10,446
Location
Scottsdale, Az
I’m okay with trading down if none of the top 3 CBs are still on the board. I see round 1 like this,

Horne/Farley
Harris (pass on Etienne)
Smith/Waddle/Toney

Why pass on Etienne?
 

HairZach

Veteran
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
258
Reaction score
315
Location
VA
Put me in the camp that won't be mad if we take Harris at 16. I know it would be better to trade down a couple spots to take him but honestly, I don't see anyone trading up to 16. I still expect us to go CB.
 

Cardiac

Registered User
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
11,555
Reaction score
2,147
This is obviously a wacky year so who knows what teams are thinking about trading up or back. We have already seen 3 trades. They were QB driven but there are teams that desperately need a OT or edge rusher that would trade up to get their guy.

Will no combine mean teams have better knowledge on some players than others so they want to move up.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
419,076
Posts
4,467,255
Members
5,997
Latest member
Pokinmik
Top