Round 1

Discussion in 'Arizona Cardinals' started by Harry, Mar 27, 2021.

  1. JohnnyCakes

    JohnnyCakes Miserables Contributor

    Posts:
    194
    Likes Received:
    181
    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2020
    Location:
    Phoenix
    I am intrigued by Moore.
     
  2. Ouchie-Z-Clown

    Ouchie-Z-Clown I'm better than Mulli!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    36,306
    Likes Received:
    19,760
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Location:
    SoCal
    I get that. That said I would’ve likely classified boldin and Fitz in the same group (mind I’m not saying they were similar skill sets, just same general group - neither was a vertical threat in a speed sense and neither was a make-you-miss Waterbug YAC guy) and that worked pretty well.
     
  3. Ouchie-Z-Clown

    Ouchie-Z-Clown I'm better than Mulli!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    36,306
    Likes Received:
    19,760
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Location:
    SoCal
    As much as it wouldn’t knock my socks off, I might have to consider it. Depends what olinemen, edge, and if Marshall is available. Maybe even consider zaven Collins if he’s still there.
     
  4. AZCardsWin

    AZCardsWin Our waiting is over!

    Age:
    48
    Posts:
    1,082
    Likes Received:
    96
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Location:
    Somerset County, New Jersey
    Keim is a pretty good smoke screener (as we saw with JJ Watt), what about TE Kyle Pitts in 1st Rd, and a CB/RB in the 2nd Rd?
     
  5. Cuozzo

    Cuozzo Trombonist in Roger Goodell's Wedding Rcpt.

    Age:
    58
    Posts:
    3,572
    Likes Received:
    1,221
    Joined:
    May 13, 2002
    Location:
    MN for now.
    I love me some Rondale Moore:



    Yeah, he's only played about 1 1/2 years of college ball, but he's fast, smart, and super-strong for a guy his size.
     
    cardncubfan likes this.
  6. Stout

    Stout Hold onto the ball, Murray!

    Age:
    44
    Posts:
    27,536
    Likes Received:
    3,840
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
    He is a TERRIBLE draft smoke screener.
     
  7. football karma

    football karma Happy in the pretense of knowledge

    Posts:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    5,057
    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Marshall is another WR that i would have no issue taking at 48

    what Moore gives you: dynamic run after catch guy. probably a killer slot guy, with added benefit of reverses, etc. He has shown he can catch over the shoulder, so he likely isnt limited to short stuff. In summary: the potential to be a guy that defenses have to account for every down. Thats attractive.

    what makes me pause: at a certain point, size does matter for a WR and 5-7 is just sooooo short. At 48, you are thinking of getting player in your top 26 or so (i.e. doesnt have to be an everydown player, but someone on the field a lot). Will Moore ever be more than a part time gadget player? Thats fine for JJ Nelson picked in the 6th, but not at 48.
     
  8. Harry

    Harry ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer

    Age:
    73
    Posts:
    5,507
    Likes Received:
    8,208
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    There’s certainly much to like about Moore. It wouldn’t break my heart if they took him. He has good speed to spread the field. He could help as a returner. I like Williams better if he’s there. At his size he’s likely a role player. His durability is a concern though some small guys have done well and survived. I’d rather have a player who would be involved in more plays, but finding one in this draft is a huge task.
     
  9. Chopper0080

    Chopper0080 2021 - Prove It

    Posts:
    19,051
    Likes Received:
    13,160
    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Location:
    Colorado
    I really struggle with Moore’s size. Serious outlier.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    Krangthebrain and Chris_Sanders like this.
  10. Praxis

    Praxis Registered

    Posts:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    531
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2015
    Toney is my favorite trade down candidate. Pitts would be a no-brainer.
     
    Krangthebrain likes this.
  11. Chopper0080

    Chopper0080 2021 - Prove It

    Posts:
    19,051
    Likes Received:
    13,160
    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Location:
    Colorado
    Agree on Pitts but it is mostly about my preference in personnel. I prefer 11 personnel to 10 personnel. I feel it lets you do more and can be more difficult for the defense to matchup with depending on the TE. I feel Pitts would let you run 11 personnel size with 10 personnel receiving ability. Hopkins, Green, Kirk and Pitts would be a tough group to matchup with IMO.
     
    GatorAZ, b8rtm8nn, Cardiac and 3 others like this.
  12. Rohinaz

    Rohinaz Registered

    Posts:
    469
    Likes Received:
    450
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2018
    Location:
    Scottsdale
    I'd take terrace Marshall from LSU. He just ran a 4.38 and it nearly 6ft 4. We need a big fast wr with great hands

    Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
     
  13. Chopper0080

    Chopper0080 2021 - Prove It

    Posts:
    19,051
    Likes Received:
    13,160
    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Location:
    Colorado
    Marshall measured in at 6'2.
     
  14. Ouchie-Z-Clown

    Ouchie-Z-Clown I'm better than Mulli!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    36,306
    Likes Received:
    19,760
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Location:
    SoCal
    Faster than I expected.
     
    Krangthebrain likes this.
  15. Ouchie-Z-Clown

    Ouchie-Z-Clown I'm better than Mulli!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    36,306
    Likes Received:
    19,760
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Location:
    SoCal
    Still pretty amazing size-speed specimen.
     

Share This Page