JB NAMED AS CARDS STARTER!!!!

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,011
Reaction score
46,939
Location
UK
He signed a 2 year contract so the Cardinals at least have him for at least one more year. However I wouldn't mind tacking on another year if he continues to lead the offense in the right direction. I see Brissett as a Josh McCown bridge type of QB. He is a stable force on the offense that helps to win games but won't win games by himself.

Might not have much choice because the draft class looks pretty weak for immediate starters (I wouldn't mind a punt on Allar or Nussmeier who have been limited by bad coaching changes) and FA is also weak. It's not going to be easy to get a new starter next season.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,011
Reaction score
46,939
Location
UK
I don't think the Cardinals have to take the QBOF in 2026 Draft. Next year's QB class is pretty week IMO. However, Gannon does need to show that his staff can win games next season. The Cardinals need to be in Playoff contention at a minimum next season no ifs, ands, or buts about it. Otherwise it will be time to look for a new regime.

How though without a QB? I agree the draft looks weak, but so does FA. As things stand it's likely JB (or Kyler).

I really like what JB is doing, but can he do it for a whole season and stay healthy?
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,011
Reaction score
46,939
Location
UK
Love how JB stays in the pocket and slides from pressure to make the completion.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
21,913
Reaction score
17,701
Location
Chandler, Az
True but there’s a reason he’s has so little mileage. Teams have considered him to start, but he’s always fallen short. He’s decent, but not special. That makes him the perfect backup.

Rich Gannon was kind of that way as well. He bounced around with multiple teams with not much success. Then he landed in the perfect situation with a ton of experience and blossomed in year 13 of his career.

If the Cardinals D can continue to grow and become a top 15 defense, having a stable QB like Brissett might be all that the Cardinals need to be successful in the short term until they can find their QBOTF.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,011
Reaction score
46,939
Location
UK
What's been impressive about Brissett is his ball placement. He's at 6 passing TD's and only 1 INT, and that INT should have been a penalty. I don't recall any passes that the opposition have had a chance at playing, his passes are always on the money.

He has the lowest INT percentage of any QB in NFL history.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
42,642
Reaction score
29,601
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I don't think the Cardinals have to take the QBOF in 2026 Draft. Next year's QB class is pretty week IMO. However, Gannon does need to show that his staff can win games next season. The Cardinals need to be in Playoff contention at a minimum next season no ifs, ands, or buts about it. Otherwise it will be time to look for a new regime.
These are basement level expectations. With this, without actually making the playoffs, you would be keeping Gannon and company around until 2029 at minimum, because they get their QB in 2027 and then you have to give them a few years with the new QB.

Nah. If they aren't in the playoffs next year, they don't get that much time. Even if they are, it's still a wait and see. Hell, I'm not convinced we should bring everyone back, because why should Monti and Gannon get more time, the way they've effed it all up?
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
15,169
Reaction score
34,657
Location
Orlando, FL
im down with brissett until he starts playing like a back up again - looks like he's figured something out tho probably from watching kyler scramble so unnecessarily

i didn't expect brissett to be this fearless and efficient so i honestly don't know what to expect going forward
Teams weren’t ready for the huge change in the design of the offense. Plus better QB play seemed to energize the receivers. In Dallas’ case they’re just lousy on defense.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
15,169
Reaction score
34,657
Location
Orlando, FL
If he plays the rest of the season with the same results that he has the last three games you almost have to have him as you’re starter next year….. sure you still draft a quarterback. But I would say he would’ve earned it.
Depends on other QBs on the roster
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
1,970
Reaction score
4,257
Location
VA
What's been impressive about Brissett is his ball placement. He's at 6 passing TD's and only 1 INT, and that INT should have been a penalty. I don't recall any passes that the opposition have had a chance at playing, his passes are always on the money.

He has the lowest INT percentage of any QB in NFL history.
He's the ultimate game manager. Won't elevate a bad scheme/situation like the Patriots last year, but he certainly won't bring down a good one. Although what he has done the past 3 weeks goes far beyond game management, we're #1 in the league in 3rd conversion rate these past 3 weeks. If he has continued success this season that is a very good sign for MHJ.

You must be registered for see images attach

He spelled the end of the Sam Howell experiment in 2023. Out played Deshaun Watson in 2022. For some reason Flores had him starting over pre-concussion Tua for 6 games in 2021. Started 16 games when Andrew Luck retired in 2019, went 7-9 with Zach Pascal as his #1 WR (Remember his 4 catches for us in 2023), their real #1 T.Y. Hilton was banged up most of the season.

Just a very interesting career. Certainly not the worst candidate for a Geno resurgence or bridge.
 

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
7,844
Reaction score
5,504
Location
The 215
I'm all for this. He's not going to win every game from here on out, but we will resemble an NFL team at the least. What's bad about it is that I think we mop the Seahawks ND Niners if he had played. That's just me, but we were the better team for most of the day in SF and better QB play would have in all likelihood had put us in position to not relay on the defense to close out against the Hags.
 

BirdGangThing

Murd Watcher
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
29,534
Reaction score
36,851
Location
Arcadia
you can turn brisket into steak but it will be tougher than traditional steak cuts like ribeye - unless it's cooked using a specific method such as a long low-and-slow cook or a sous vide process to tenderize the collagen
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,663
Reaction score
13,343
Location
York, PA
There are plenty of coaches who believe you do not lose your starting position due to injury. That's what was so frustrating about Gannon responding to reporter's - like a robot - "If Kyler's healthy, he starts." when asked about Kyler and Jacoby.
Yes, I understand that. But, there’s more coach speak now than there ever has been. I do believe that Gannon has known all along that Murray would be out longer than what was initially expected, so it was easier to say what he’s been saying. And with JB playing as well as he had, it was time for JG to just come clean.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
15,169
Reaction score
34,657
Location
Orlando, FL
Anthony Richardson!!!


J/K
He likely is available. Unfortunately he’s a bigger version of Murray. He didn’t come out of college with good mechanics and despite the Colts best effort, he didn’t improve. As a result his completion percentage is terrible, barely reaching 50%. He throws more interceptions than TDs. College was just about as bad. He’s a great athlete and an outstanding runner. He’s a major project. If a coach could reach him, none has yet, he could be outstanding. He has a big arm, enough agility to throw on the run and he plays with energy. I’m have a low level of confidence he could be developed. He’s more interesting than the free agents, but he’s not worth more than a late conditional pick.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
16,482
Reaction score
17,538
The Cardinals will be using a high draft pick on a QB next draft unless someone unforeseen hits the market.
i think they win too many games

and i think the Saints, Jets, Dolphins all will be in a better spot to get the top 3

OTOH, I suppose we can all look forward to the 300 page Garrett Nussmeier debate thread
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
22,382
Reaction score
22,316
Location
Modesto, California
#1: We need to get our QBOF in 2026, not 2027. Ain't no way I'm keeping Monti and Gannon around several more years to THEN give them several more years with a new QB. If they can't find success, and soon (this season, for me), then bye bye.

#2: Gannon took the job. IDGAF why, and I don't blame him for doing it, but we can't pretend he wasn't married to Kyler when he took the job. Tough ish to Gannon that it didn't work out. Just because it's obvious you should take a head coaching job doesn't absolve you from the results.
disagree.
we all knew this(those with functional intellects)..that we were signing a rookie head coach...and we knew there was a huge possibility for a learning curve and some serious lumps...we knew this...and its exactly what we got.
making a change at HC is balls out foolish..... why??...simple,...because then we are just starting the process all over again.
who out there available is a better HC than JG??

hint...you either know a guy is better because he has years of experience...or you dont know if he is better because he has never done the job...and if he has never done the job....your net change is zero....your actually going backwards because he has to learn the same crap JG learned all over again.

we knew when we hired him we were growing a head coach.
its balls in the wind silly to go through the actual growing pains then toss him out before we get the benefits of growing our own coach.

Bill Bilichik was 36-44 with the Browns and only had a single season with a winning record.

IMO, the biggest mistake was in allowing the rookie HC to also hire rookie coordinators...I mean, since he was a DC I can see letting him bring in another rookie DC...but in no way should he have been allowed to hire a rookie OC....similar to how kliff had an experienced DC we should have made monti hire an experienced OC to pair with Rallis...so JG had one side of the ball he could just forget about...

truth is, for three guys all doing their jobs for the very first time...with no safety net...these guys havent done that badly...I mean, expected way more, but it seems the disease from within has hampered them more than expected
 
Back
Top