James Conner & SMB Restructures - Will Be Back

OP
OP
PDXChris

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
34,412
Reaction score
34,793
Location
PDX
Ryland should have some competition. He wasn't that good last season.
He has a knee issue in his plant foot, that was why they ended up shutting him down.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
28,607
Reaction score
22,950
Location
The Giant Toaster
what the actual **** are they thinking?
Im as big a JC fan as anybody,...dude beat cancer...helluva story..provides leadership...awesome, that has worked so well for us to date...
but dude is 31 and only the rarest of elites are effective past this point...

bad move...should have sent him back to Pittsburgh to retire a stiller
It makes more sense to keep Conner for say $5m than it does to cut him and still get hit for half that. Given his leadership and backup role next season depending on the contract details.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Love Connor but he is coming back from injury, he’s 31 years old and more importantly is he is a PLODDER. No defense is going to worry about him busting a 60 yard run.
I want to believe ML is not planning on 12-14 play drives. Do we really want to hope that Benson is suddenly “ The Guy”?
Love would provide this offense with speed and an instant home run threat.
That 15 yard run by Connor could be a 60 yard td with Love.
Think McCaffery. Think our opponents playing a bit closer to the LOS. Think Wilson and McBride with more room to run.
Add a couple o-linemen and the threat of Willis instead of Brissett.
Let Connor take some snaps but depending on him to be the guy is stupid.
But then again, we are good at stupid.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
42,080
Reaction score
33,367
If we drafted Love at #3 we all know what will happen. It goes without saying.
 

JosiahLee

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Posts
2,999
Reaction score
6,132
Location
Gilbert
Surely the plan at RB in 2026 is not JC and Benson…I mean right? How dumb would you have to be. I don’t buy that Monti is that dumb.

I love JC but he’s slow as molasses, and he’s only gonna be slower this season. It’s gotta be Love at #3
 

JosiahLee

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Posts
2,999
Reaction score
6,132
Location
Gilbert
Love Connor but he is coming back from injury, he’s 31 years old and more importantly is he is a PLODDER. No defense is going to worry about him busting a 60 yard run.
I want to believe ML is not planning on 12-14 play drives. Do we really want to hope that Benson is suddenly “ The Guy”?
Love would provide this offense with speed and an instant home run threat.
That 15 yard run by Connor could be a 60 yard td with Love.
Think McCaffery. Think our opponents playing a bit closer to the LOS. Think Wilson and McBride with more room to run.
Add a couple o-linemen and the threat of Willis instead of Brissett.
Let Connor take some snaps but depending on him to be the guy is stupid.
But then again, we are good at stupid.
Exactly. The era of elite RBs is back IMO, and they make a huge difference on winning teams.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,415
Reaction score
33,045
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
It makes more sense to keep Conner for say $5m than it does to cut him and still get hit for half that. Given his leadership and backup role next season depending on the contract details.
This is the Cardinals. They aren't bringing JC back to be a backup.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,694
Reaction score
48,826
Location
UK
Conner 100% prohibits any meaningful addition at RB UNLESS Monti just gives up on Benson which would be another failure in already bountiful bouquet of bad.

Similarly, why bring back SMB unless you have little to no faith in Melton and E Jones? STV is coming back as well which potentially further banishes two of Monti’s day 2 draft picks to the shadow realm.

Unserious franchise that could have freed up 14.8 mil combined and now will likely save 10 or less.

Teams should be drafting for the future, not the present. Keeping Conner for another year shouldn't prohibit changes at RB, depending on his cap number, especially as it doesn't look like they will be bring Emari back.

Monti should be drafting for how he sees the team next year after Conner is gone.

Nobody should be judging either of these restructures and what they mean until we see the details.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,376
Reaction score
56,250
Location
Colorado
Teams should be drafting for the future, not the present. Keeping Conner for another year shouldn't prohibit changes at RB, depending on his cap number, especially as it doesn't look like they will be bring Emari back.

Monti should be drafting for how he sees the team next year after Conner is gone.

Nobody should be judging either of these restructures and what they mean until we see the details.
Cutting Conner would have adjusted him 9 mil cap hit to a 2 mil cap hit. Saving 7 mil. If your goal is to invest heavily into another RB (high draft pick or significant FA contract) to be your primary RB, why would you pass on saving 7 mil by cutting your backup?

If you are drafting a RB at 3, a position that has a notorious short career span, why would you waste one of those years?
 

FB94

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
4,674
Reaction score
6,522
Location
Anthem
JC is now our short yardage goal line back period. Benson is still a ?. Drafting a RB is still viable
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,333,781
Posts
6,548,384
Members
6,431
Latest member
Arlene Lake
Top