Draft Positioning Week 16

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,377
Reaction score
56,264
Location
Colorado
The other interesting question is if the Giants don't go QB at 1, would they really draft Arvell Reese at 1 with Brian Burns on his huge contract, just having drafted Abdul Carter last year at 3 overall, and having Thibadeaux at 14 mil. Obviously they could probably unload Thib but that would still be a lot of assets allocated to the EDGE position on a roster lacking talent.

That kinda leads to a trade back scenario which then would cause a little more uncertainty with QB needy teams (potentially) like the Rams and Dolphins lurking in the 10-15 range.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
28,611
Reaction score
22,953
Location
The Giant Toaster
The other interesting question is if the Giants don't go QB at 1, would they really draft Arvell Reese at 1 with Brian Burns on his huge contract, just having drafted Abdul Carter last year at 3 overall, and having Thibadeaux at 14 mil. Obviously they could probably unload Thib but that would still be a lot of assets allocated to the EDGE position on a roster lacking talent.

That kinda leads to a trade back scenario which then would cause a little more uncertainty with QB needy teams (potentially) like the Rams and Dolphins lurking in the 10-15 range.
I believe they would take a good package but not a massive haul for that reason. Dart isn’t special but he’s shown enough for the Giants to take on an extra first from NYJ or AZ.

Let’s say we’re at #5 and we want Mendoza. I’m offering #5 and our 27’ 1st but not additional 2nd’s. I like but don’t love these QB’s. If the Jets outbid us I can live with that.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,074
Reaction score
42,394
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I believe they would take a good package but not a massive haul for that reason. Dart isn’t special but he’s shown enough for the Giants to take on an extra first from NYJ or AZ.

Let’s say we’re at #5 and we want Mendoza. I’m offering #5 and our 27’ 1st but not additional 2nd’s. I like but don’t love these QB’s. If the Jets outbid us I can live with that.
Yup and probably a new GM who will happily show off how smart and savvy he is by negotiating a trade of a dollar for two quarters three dimes and two nickels.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,377
Reaction score
56,264
Location
Colorado
What do you feel the drop off is from each QB?
Mendoza gives you the most experience and best size of the bunch. He isn't a top athlete but can move around. You have to determine what to make of his Cal years and how much of his improvement is due to the Indiana environment vs Mendoza getting better.

Simpson is more polished than Moore and could start early, but his physical tools are not as significant. The question will be asked why he didn't play more prior to this year.

Moore is just very raw, and is going to need a lot of teaching/coaching/developing. He hasn't really had a game where he played well vs a tough opponent.

I view them all pretty close. What probably should end up separating them will be things I won't ever have access to. Which one is the most relentless worker? Which one is the most critical of themselves? What has really changed about Mendoza's level of play from Cal to Indiana? Can Dante Moore beat a good team? What level of arm talent does Simpson actually have? What NFL arm is it comparable to?
 
Last edited:

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Orlando, FL
I kinda agree. The toughest part will be finding someone to trade up IMO.

While I understand that interest in building the offensive line, I don't believe it is so desperate that you pass up a potentially game changing pass rusher for it. This is why I find @Stout 's viewpoint a little funny. I feel like he has been fairly critical of Monti passing up Will Anderson for Paris Johnson and this would be essentially making the same decision again (without probably trading back up) but he is now for it.
I think trades will be there. For example if a team wants a RB, Love is far and away the best option. If Downs is there, he’s unique in this draft. Those are the guys people typically trade up to get. It’s also possible that someone sees a WR as separating from the pack. There are GMs that make that play also. I think the Cards can move if they choose to do so.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,296
Reaction score
13,959
I think trades will be there. For example if a team wants a RB, Love is far and away the best option. If Downs is there, he’s unique in this draft. Those are the guys people typically trade up to get. It’s also possible that someone sees a WR as separating from the pack. There are GMs that make that play also. I think the Cards can move if they choose to do so.
I have a love love relationship with Love.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Orlando, FL
Monti? I mentioned it in a reply to Harry but you are essentially advocating to do this year what Monti did in 2023 except (maybe) without the trade back. I am shocked you want to potentially pass on Will Anderson, again.
The 2023 draft was weak in OTs. The Cards felt somewhat pressured to protect Murray coming back from an ACL tear. Humphries was starting to decline, so OT was a serious concern. Certainly Anderson was potentially the player he turned out to be. In retrospect he was the better choice, though I think Johnson is underrated by the board. I don’t see this year as identical. Fano and Mauigoa are currently above the others. The second tier showed marked improvement as the season went on. Proctor and Goosby closed a lot of ground. Lomu also looked improved as well. I like you choice of Mauigoa, but I think the next 3 would be functional.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,377
Reaction score
56,264
Location
Colorado
The 2023 draft was weak in OTs. The Cards felt somewhat pressured to protect Murray coming back from an ACL tear. Humphries was starting to decline, so OT was a serious concern. Certainly Anderson was potentially the player he turned out to be. In retrospect he was the better choice, though I think Johnson is underrated by the board. I don’t see this year as identical. Fano and Mauigoa are currently above the others. The second tier showed marked improvement as the season went on. Proctor and Goosby closed a lot of ground. Lomu also looked improved as well. I like you choice of Mauigoa, but I think the next 3 would be functional.
Interesting. I don't really like Proctor or Lomu that much in terms of top 20. I think there is a big gap between them and Fano/Mauinoga. I haven't focused much on Goosby yet tbh.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,377
Reaction score
56,264
Location
Colorado
The more and more I watch of David Bailey, the more and more I think he would be a great option for AZ. Fast off the ball. Nice dip. Has a spin and a rip. Plays with violence. Great production. EDGE is a really important position, and the Cardinals could use an actual rush threat opposite of Sweat.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,415
Reaction score
33,047
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
IMO...the top OTs are not the same level of prospects as the top EDGE players from what I have seen. They are good players but not top 5 guys. They would both be a reach for need.
I cannot claim I know anything about them, really, so I can't argue. I did hear one of the edge prospects have short arms, though. That would be a no thank you from me.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,415
Reaction score
33,047
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I kinda agree. The toughest part will be finding someone to trade up IMO.

While I understand that interest in building the offensive line, I don't believe it is so desperate that you pass up a potentially game changing pass rusher for it. This is why I find @Stout 's viewpoint a little funny. I feel like he has been fairly critical of Monti passing up Will Anderson for Paris Johnson and this would be essentially making the same decision again (without probably trading back up) but he is now for it.
That's fair. Like I said, it's mainly because I don't know the prospects.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,415
Reaction score
33,047
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Mendoza gives you the most experience and best size of the bunch. He isn't a top athlete but can move around. You have to determine what to make of his Cal years and how much of his improvement is due to the Indiana environment vs Mendoza getting better.

Simpson is more polished than Moore and could start early, but his physical tools are not as significant. The question will be asked why he didn't play more prior to this year.

Moore is just very raw, and is going to need a lot of teaching/coaching/developing. He hasn't really had a game where he played well vs a tough opponent.

I view them all pretty close. What probably should end up separating them will be things I won't ever have access to. Which one is the most relentless worker? Which one is the most critical of themselves? What has really changed about Mendoza's level of play from Cal to Indiana? Can Dante Moore beat a good team? What level of arm talent does Simpson actually have? What NFL arm is it comparable to?
The tiebreaker for Mendoza for me is the sheer amount of work he puts in. The one game he was interviewed, and we learned he gets up, watches film, hits the gym, practices, throws extra with his WRs, goes to school, then watches film again. I am all in on that kind of prospect, after what we have endured. Plus I caught some real clutch moments from him in the very little CFB viewing I have done.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Orlando, FL
The more and more I watch of David Bailey, the more and more I think he would be a great option for AZ. Fast off the ball. Nice dip. Has a spin and a rip. Plays with violence. Great production. EDGE is a really important position, and the Cardinals could use an actual rush threat opposite of Sweat.
I think he goes too early. Only fit is if they trade down a little. Of course if they do get a decent QB or a young one, they must fix the Oline.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Orlando, FL
The tiebreaker for Mendoza for me is the sheer amount of work he puts in. The one game he was interviewed, and we learned he gets up, watches film, hits the gym, practices, throws extra with his WRs, goes to school, then watches film again. I am all in on that kind of prospect, after what we have endured. Plus I caught some real clutch moments from him in the very little CFB viewing I have done.
Gym rat indeed.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
22,542
Reaction score
10,691
I think trades will be there. For example if a team wants a RB, Love is far and away the best option. If Downs is there, he’s unique in this draft. Those are the guys people typically trade up to get. It’s also possible that someone sees a WR as separating from the pack. There are GMs that make that play also. I think the Cards can move if they choose to do so.
If no trade up for a QB, I'm trying to prepare everyone for Downs being the pick. That's a Gannon/Monti pick to the tee.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,377
Reaction score
56,264
Location
Colorado
I think he goes too early. Only fit is if they trade down a little. Of course if they do get a decent QB or a young one, they must fix the Oline.
Maybe. I do seem to be higher on him than most. I don’t really understand why. Maybe as more concrete testing info comes out it will be clearer.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Orlando, FL
The curse continues. The teams with the best chance of winning in week 18 are the Giants and the Raiders. We need both to win 2 games. Ironically they play each other this week, so only one can win 2 games, Hilarious! Best hope is for the Raiders to beat the Giants and the KC. Seems remote. I just don’t think any QB is likely unless Simpson comes out. Can’t get any read on how the Cards feel about him. Supposedly they like Willis & Jackson.
 

SpokaneCardfan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Posts
1,379
Reaction score
589
Location
Spokane
The curse continues. The teams with the best chance of winning in week 18 are the Giants and the Raiders. We need both to win 2 games. Ironically they play each other this week, so only one can win 2 games, Hilarious! Best hope is for the Raiders to beat the Giants and the KC. Seems remote. I just don’t think any QB is likely unless Simpson comes out. Can’t get any read on how the Cards feel about him. Supposedly they like Willis &
 
Last edited:
Top