Budda Baker getting paid

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
7,561
Reaction score
7,306
Location
Home of the Thunder
Don't praise MO for making this basic move.

I 1000% guarantee you Steve "prime time" Keim would have also shored up BB's contract and would have kept BB's status from being an issue for all of the season.

Good-time-Stevie was a master at managing player's contracts!
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,347
Reaction score
60,963
It may have been part of the negotiation. Cards got Budda to buy in for 1 more year, knowing they'd let him be a FA next year.
If that’s the case, why not just trade him to another team and actually get something of value as opposed to letting another talented guy walk in for absolutely nothing?
 
Last edited:

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
25,594
Reaction score
32,180
Location
BirdGangThing
Don't praise MO for making this basic move.

I 1000% guarantee you Steve "prime time" Keim would have also shored up BB's contract and would have kept BB's status from being an issue for all of the season.

Good-time-Stevie was a master at managing player's contracts!
He would have given Budda a 5 year extension with 90% of the money deferred for another 5 years after that, continuing to hamstring the team's salary cap.
 

Ronin

…..
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
133,265
Reaction score
52,896
Location
Las Cruces, New Mexico
I merged the two threads because it is already being talked about here. There is also more info on the contract in the " budda gets paid " thread
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,347
Reaction score
60,963
$3.75 dead money in 2024

If the plan truly is to release him next year, why would they not just accelerate all this to this year’s cap instead of contiuining to create dead money for next year?
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,777
Reaction score
26,490
Location
Gilbert, AZ
If the plan truly is to release him next year, why would they not just accelerate all this to this year’s cap instead of contiuining to create dead money for next year?
You can't accelerate money that's already been paid. The $3.775 million if/when he's released next year is what's already been paid on his before-today deal. Maybe that number goes up a little, but it won't be a ton.

Even less if they stretch it.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,347
Reaction score
60,963
You can't accelerate money that's already been paid. The $3.775 million if/when he's released next year is what's already been paid on his before-today deal. Maybe that number goes up a little, but it won't be a ton.

Even less if they stretch it.
Gotcha
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,728
Reaction score
10,973
If that’s the case, why not just trade him to another team and actually get something of value as opposed to letting another talented guy walk in for absolutely nothing?
Not the Cardinals way it seems.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,000
Reaction score
11,427
Location
York, PA
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Great job by MO to create incentives based on actually being available. It’s a new era in Cardinal football. It may take a couple years to reap benefits from a W/L perspective, but you have to start somewhere when you’re trying to establish a sustainable culture.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
15,021
Reaction score
11,704
Why would they release him next year? Because of his salary? Why not extend him next year? He'll be 28 in 2024. I would like to extend him for a couple of more years. Like JG said he plays the game the way it should be played.
Maybe if Simmons shows some ability at S, you'll keep him instead with the money already invested in Thompson at S?
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,728
Reaction score
10,973
Maybe if Simmons shows some ability at S, you'll keep him instead with the money already invested in Thompson at S?
Hopefully if that is the case, they trade him and not release him. He doesn't seem the type to sit out as he is at camp now. If he stays healthy and produces, we should get good value in return.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
15,021
Reaction score
11,704
Simmons will be a free agent after this season.
Yeah - we'll play him out of position until his last season, then he'll have a breakout year and sign elsewhere. The Cardinal way?

What I was expressing was that theoretically, since we've invested in Thompson as well, the Cards might make a decision between paying Budda again as one of the highest paid players at his position, perhaps you instead pay Simmons. (assuming he can actually play at S)
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,728
Reaction score
10,973
Yeah - we'll play him out of position until his last season, then he'll have a breakout year and sign elsewhere. The Cardinal way?

What I was expressing was that theoretically, since we've invested in Thompson as well, the Cards might make a decision between paying Budda again as one of the highest paid players at his position, perhaps you instead pay Simmons. (assuming he can actually play at S)
You would think they could get away with paying Simmons half of what they pay Budda if he performs enough to earn a 2nd contract.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
536,511
Posts
5,258,840
Members
6,275
Latest member
PicksFromDave
Top