Adam Schein's Take on Cardinals Win

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
24,270
Reaction score
24,996
Location
Modesto, California
anyone else consider we are perhaps witnessing the countdown to Logan Thomas?....


seems all the rage these days to have your young mobile QB come in mid season and lead your team to the playoffs............
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
17,232
Reaction score
10,832
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
Two words Scott Mitchell. It's only two games. The NFL weeds out those who can play from those who can't. Heart is awesome but it's not even most important. I wouldn't say Montana had heart really at all. I would say in his prime there is no QB I would rather put money on.

Good point, now the other teams have some film on the dude, lets see how he does. I am not ready to annoint him yet but, he's got my attention.
 

Iceman

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Posts
4,471
Reaction score
195
Location
Gilbert
The defense is feeding off the offense as well as playing lights off. Love this team right now because there are NO individuals. Arians has these guys playing for each other and they are playing for him. The Super Bowl team wasn't ran by Whisenhunt, it was Warner. Now we have a top notch coach that these players would do anything for. Very disciplined and we rarely see a 15 yd unsportsmanlike penalties, like the punks we just played. Can't ask for 3 better coaches in this state than Arians, Graham and Rodriguez. Arizona sports are starting to be put on the map.... It's great to be an Arizonan
 

CardNots

ASFN Addict
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
5,982
Reaction score
7,119
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
anyone else consider we are perhaps witnessing the countdown to Logan Thomas?....


seems all the rage these days to have your young mobile QB come in mid season and lead your team to the playoffs............

When I saw thomas on the sideline warming up, I had warming in my pants like I crapped em:D

No thanks
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,190
Drew Stanton must remain Cardinals' QB over Carson Palmer
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...n-must-remain-cardinals-qb-over-carson-palmer



attachment.php


PS - Don't shoot the messenger.

You must be registered for see images
 

Chaz

observationist
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Posts
11,327
Reaction score
7
Location
Wandering the Universe
All this Stanton love is recency bias. All the things people love about Stanton (running to keep the drive alive, no turnovers, toughness) is the same thing Palmer has already demonstrated this year.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
28,745
Reaction score
23,084
Location
The Giant Toaster
There is no controversy. One of them can't throw let alone grip a football. The game vs Denver's defense will be telling.
 

Carolinacacti

ASFN Lifer
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Posts
2,931
Reaction score
1,871
Location
Charlotte NC
More then a hand full of QB's could take this team to the playoffs. Good Offensive line with weapons at all positions and good defense makes for a good team.
I do like Drew and Bruce all mighty. Palmer will return and we will hope the turnovers do not return with him.
 

THESMEL

Smushdown! Take it like a fan!
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
6,142
Reaction score
1,381
Location
Vernon
Pump the brakes! Sun Schein - I thought Logan Thomas was about to enter a couple times!
 

8ndkorner

Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
1,272
Reaction score
1
Location
Hawaii
All I know is, I'm a lot happier with the Stanton/Palmer QB controversy than the DA/Max Hall/Skelton debate... :)

Bert, I'm here to hear you. If you must have a controversy I for one am glad that this year it's "Why are we undefeated? Why are we playing well?
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
11,084
Reaction score
14,459
Location
York, PA
I have been saying this for the last 24 hours.

I have seen what I needed to from Drew Stanton at this point. HAs anyone seen him throw into coverage in two games. Palmer does that 3-4 times A GAME. I really like Palmer but we dont need to sling the ball 50 times to win. We have a complete team.

Which is why the guy who doesnt turn over the ball, can pick up the first down with his feet when needed, AND do about a 80% impression of the big play down field throws Palmer makes that WOW you.

This seems silly right now. But I actually think this will become a #hottertake as time goes on.

Think you guys are underselling Stanton. And I actually like Palmer more than most. But we lose that game yesterday with him as I see AT LEAST 1 Niners INT that completly changes the game. I dont think BA will make the change but Im shocked its less talked about and seen as inevitable that Palmer takes back over.

Credit to BA on that. In Arians I trust but I think Stanton is better than people are giving him credit for.

I never thought I'd remotely agree with the idea of playing Stanton over Palmer, but 0 turnovers make the Cardinals a very difficult team to beat. Palmer will always be prone to turnovers, it's in his DNA. Now don't get me wrong, Stanton may very well start turning over the ball too. But if he played like he has the last 2 weeks, his style may be exactly what will make the Cardinals a very tough out. BA's first words as HC - The Cardinals won't beat the Cardinals. Not sure Palmer fits into that mold. Stanton may??? I have an open mind right now.
 

TJ

Knower of Ball
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
39,086
Reaction score
27,538
Location
South Bay
Quarterback one-hit wonders:

  • Scott Mitchell
  • Derek Anderson
  • Mark Rypien
  • Rob Johnson
  • Jay Fiedler
  • Kevin Kolb

The list goes on.

Let's not get too excited about one decent performance. Palmer is the more accomplished, proven QB and Stanton is still a a relative unknown. In addition to which, if you bench Palmer, it's for good. Palmer quit on both the Bengals and Raiders, so his loyalty to teams only goes so far. Even if Stanton struggles, Palmer would jump ship at the end of the season and we'd be stuck with Logan Thomas.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,321
Reaction score
1,206
Location
SE Valley
Two words Scott Mitchell. It's only two games. The NFL weeds out those who can play from those who can't. Heart is awesome but it's not even most important. I wouldn't say Montana had heart really at all. I would say in his prime there is no QB I would rather put money on.
Joe Cool, huh? Yeah, right! :sarcasm:

You don't win time and time again in the biggest games, the highest pressure situations, without heart. Montana played with plenty of heart. HUGE heart!
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
42,268
Reaction score
33,659
Joe Cool, huh? Yeah, right! :sarcasm:

You don't win time and time again in the biggest games, the highest pressure situations, without heart. Montana played with plenty of heart. HUGE heart!

Yeah, I cannot believe anyone would question Montana's heart.

I remember the game against the Oilers when Montana was in KC and he took multiple shots that would be called personal fouls today. Straight up, the Oilers were doing everything they could to hurt him and get him out of the game. The Houston DC? Buddy Ryan. Montana humiliated Ryan's defense in that game.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Stanton was not very good.

The good thing he did was not throwing interceptions but other than that his completion % is bad. The interceptions will likely come soon.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
38,148
Reaction score
11,144
Location
Scottsdale
Stanton is playing just (barely) well enough not to lose. If not for those personal fouls on the 9ers, we might have seen a different outcome. I love what Stanton has done. Love his guts and who knows, maybe some day he'll get his chance to be a starter in the NFL. But it won't be for the Cards. The Cards are paying Palmer to be their starter, period... And I am totally OK with that! People claim, wrongly of course, that Palmer wouldn't have won the game against the 9ers... But I would more confidently say that Stanton would not have won the game against the Chargers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
11,084
Reaction score
14,459
Location
York, PA
Quarterback one-hit wonders:

  • Scott Mitchell
  • Derek Anderson
  • Mark Rypien
  • Rob Johnson
  • Jay Fiedler
  • Kevin Kolb

The list goes on.

Let's not get too excited about one decent performance. Palmer is the more accomplished, proven QB and Stanton is still a a relative unknown. In addition to which, if you bench Palmer, it's for good. Palmer quit on both the Bengals and Raiders, so his loyalty to teams only goes so far. Even if Stanton struggles, Palmer would jump ship at the end of the season and we'd be stuck with Logan Thomas.

Agree with your premise, but you need to take Mark Rypien off your list. The dude played about 10 years in the NFL. Played in multiple playoff games, was a SB MVP, & 2 time pro bowler. He's in the Redskins wall of fame, which is no small feat.
 

Chaz

observationist
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Posts
11,327
Reaction score
7
Location
Wandering the Universe
Stanton was not very good.

The good thing he did was not throwing interceptions but other than that his completion % is bad. The interceptions will likely come soon.
IMO his completion % was bad because he didn't force it.
Some of his misses were deliberate.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
What? Stanton threw the ball up for grabs a couple of times yesterday.

Youll have to show me as I didnt see it. With Palmer there are 3 throws a a game that should be or are picked. I never felt that way with Stanton. I think its fair to say he understands the offense better than Palmer and thats expected with a full year longer in the system.

I dont think its time to make sweeping proclamations just yet but A) I liked what I saw and B) we may not have a choice in the matter till we better understand what the issue is.

My point is I dont think Schiens take is off base and more importantly im astounded there is less talk about the possibility. Credit goes to Arians. With Wisenhunt Stanton would havebeen named the starter only to have 2 bad series and Logan comes in :)
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,180
Reaction score
42,612
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Youll have to show me as I didnt see it. With Palmer there are 3 throws a a game that should be or are picked. I never felt that way with Stanton. I think its fair to say he understands the offense better than Palmer and thats expected with a full year longer in the system.

I dont think its time to make sweeping proclamations just yet but A) I liked what I saw and B) we may not have a choice in the matter till we better understand what the issue is.

My point is I dont think Schiens take is off base and more importantly im astounded there is less talk about the possibility. Credit goes to Arians. With Wisenhunt Stanton would havebeen named the starter only to have 2 bad series and Logan comes in :)

There was one attempt to Fitz I think to close the first half where Fitz was alone and surrounded by literally 5 49er defenders.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
104,264
Reaction score
57,146
I suspect he probably will throw less picks than Palmer in a normal year but he had 2 flat out dropped Sunday and a 3rd that could have easily been picked(was tipped up in the air but luckily nobody was there to catch it).

That happens to NFL QB's every week but there's an element of luck to it too. the one at the end of the half was 100% luck, he threw it right to a LB he never saw and the guy dropped it.
 
Top