PortlandCardFan
Registered User
Timbers do have a pretty good fanbase. I've only recently become a fan of soccer because my daughter plays. So I don't know jack about soccer!
Nice Eagle, Globe, and Anchor!
Nice Eagle, Globe, and Anchor!
Nice Eagle, Globe, and Anchor!
November is a great month to join the corps apparently. I joined two days after the Corps birthday in 85.Semper Fi...November marks 20 yrs since I entered boot camp...I am getting old, sigh.
I didn't watch the Galaxy/Dallas match, was the game as bad for the Galaxy as the 3-0 score indicated?
And this league doesn't have the gravitas for a neutral site game. Should have been the home team with the most points.
MLS has tried to be the NFL for years. They usually come around to the obvious, only years later unfortunatley. It would have been bedlam if it was in Colorado last night. Pretty rediculous.
Part of the reason I think they go neutral site is because really they couldn't do it in a football stadium (like New England or Seattle) because of potential for scheduling conflicts. Until every team has their own venue I doubt it will happen.
They do it also because it is hard to sell tickets in a one week window and they know they can force the game on season ticket holders. However the issue selling tickets is not as true anymore with team controlling their own stadiums and rivalries. There is not one team in the league, even FC Dallas, that would have trouble selling a home MLS Cup game. The game would also have a championship atmosphere. Last night was rediculous. It was by far the worst MLS Cup I have seen in my life with a half empty stadium. It was quiet as crickets in OT. It is time to reward the fans because there are enough fans. I really hope they scrap the neutral site next season.
That is part of it but not the entire reason. Not every team controls their own stadiums right now, if that changes we might see the neutral sites go away. Houston, San Jose, New England and Seattle all share their facilities with other sports teams during the season...last thing I want to see is an MLS Cup final on a field with football lines or worse yet torn up from a football game a day earlier.
Easy solution.....don't schedule the game months in advance. All teams schedule playoff games on the fly. All of those teams have shown the ability to lose the football lines, especially Seattle, and San Jose plays in a SSS.
I am pretty sure Buck Shaw Stadium belongs to Santa Clara University and is a multi-use stadium.
New England has never been rid of the lines for MLS and Houston has the worst field in MLS esp. once Univ of Houston starts playing. I just don't see it being an easy answer...yet, eventually but right now it isn't feasible.
NE has and does remove the lines for big games and ESPN games. Buck Shaw doesn't have lines and is soccer only. Houston...I'm sure they would do what they have to IF the situation even arose, and looking at their roster it won't anytime soon. Your reasoning only kind of works with Houston and one stadium is the last reason for a neutral site. It doesn't effect playoffs, wouldn't effect the final. Automatically let the Supporter's Shield winner host MLS Cup to bypass the playoffs and you have almost a month to prepare. No excuses. MLS Cup 2010 was an embarrassment and the league knows it.
NE doesn't remove the lines for MLS games once the Patriots start playing, never done it before. They've done it for US Soccer but never for MLS.
Trust me, as a guy who has seen every single LA Galaxy game since 2003 I can assure you they have the ability to remove the lines. Maybe they don't for a NE vs Columbus match but they most certainly do when Beckham and Donovan come to town for a national game.