It’s true bc of their contracts. I still don’t believe anyone is trading for Kyler. They are going to have to cut him.Brissett has more trade value than Kyler. I’ve been saying this for a minute.
It’s true bc of their contracts. I still don’t believe anyone is trading for Kyler. They are going to have to cut him.Brissett has more trade value than Kyler. I’ve been saying this for a minute.
We are used to hard times.Hard times for K1 superfans.
They are both stupid and inept. Add in not knowing they are both.No way man. That Cardinals aren't that stupid.
We wouldn't cut off our nose just to spite our face.
If they don't find a trade partner they don't "have" to cut him, they can keep him.It’s true bc of their contracts. I still don’t believe anyone is trading for Kyler. They are going to have to cut him.
If no one wants to trade him then, what? We keep an unhappy, unproductive player on the bench for a gazillion dollars? Or is this just further fantasy that he can stay and start here for the 17th season?
His attitude? Yes, 1000 times yes. The only-ONLY way--this would work would be if he were willing to take on a backup role without pouting or complaint. Personally, I would reject even that, but for the franchise, that would be the only outlier outcome that would be acceptable. Personally, I don't think even that would make Bidwill, M. keep him. About the only thing I agree with our owner on is starting over at QB.I understand Murray did not meet expectations in 2025, but did he play so poorly that it justifies outright cutting him?
It’s a business decisionI understand Murray did not meet expectations in 2025, but did he play so poorly that it justifies outright cutting him?
His attitude? Yes, 1000 times yes. The only-ONLY way--this would work would be if he were willing to take on a backup role without pouting or complaint. Personally, I would reject even that, but for the franchise, that would be the only outlier outcome that would be acceptable. Personally, I don't think even that would make Bidwill, M. keep him. About the only thing I agree with our owner on is starting over at QB.
It’s a business decision
It seems to me that it would be a bad business decision to pay a guy to not be on the team vs paying him to be on the team.On it's face, a remarkably inefficient one if so.
Disagree. No one can say he handled last season's benching well, nor do I think anyone can argue he deserved to be benched. Who here actually thinks it's a good idea to bring him back?Stout you and I have scant evidence that his attitude is so poor as to justify cutting him. All we have is mostly conjecture and hearsay.
Depends on the guy. This isn't rocket science. Keeping Kyler on the team is seen to be keeping a negative influence. It's addition by subtraction, gaining fresh air in the QB room by getting rid of the guy who, rightly or wrongly, is responsible for a toxic air in the QB room.It seems to me that it would be a bad business decision to pay a guy to not be on the team vs paying him to be on the team.
I haven't read this whole thread but I haven't seen anything that points to Murray being a cancer in the clubhouse.Depends on the guy. This isn't rocket science. Keeping Kyler on the team is seen to be keeping a negative influence. It's addition by subtraction, gaining fresh air in the QB room by getting rid of the guy who, rightly or wrongly, is responsible for a toxic air in the QB room.
It’s sunk cost fallacy. You’re already paying him; don’t throw good money after badIt seems to me that it would be a bad business decision to pay a guy to not be on the team vs paying him to be on the team.
Of course Kyler has friends on the team. But we haven’t heard 1 word from Kyler since the Dallas game. Nothing about our new head coach…. Nothing about nothing.I haven't read this whole thread but I haven't seen anything that points to Murray being a cancer in the clubhouse.
Hard times build character, makes us stronger. Imagine if this site was all Patriots fans, we’d all be terrible asses.We are used to hard times.
It's the only thing the Cardinals provide consistently as an organization.

Crimson, do you think he would have a good attitude if we kept him, sat him, and brought in a new starter/developmental starter for Kyler to mentor? I mean, not that I think Kyler should be mentoring anyone, but the question stands.
602, I'll say one thing. Your unwavering support of K1 is admirable. You mentioned you were a small business owner, and if you run your business with the same compassion, I'm sure you are successful....respectThey are both stupid and inept. Add in not knowing they are both.
Probably the worst combination on planet earth.
QB is a unique position where it can be detrimental to the team to have a position battle. That's the reason you see vets with young QBs, or young QBs with worse QBs. You don't want to risk dividing a locker room because teammates have differing opinions on who should be in the QB leadership role. The salaries attached can also influence things. Nothing good comes from keeping Kyler on the roster to battle for a spot when he makes 45 mil. You just have to move on even if it means cutting him.Stout you and I have scant evidence that his attitude is so poor as to justify cutting him. All we have is mostly conjecture and hearsay.
Linebackers engage in a position battle. With QBs, you have a quarterback controversy.QB is a unique position where it can be detrimental to the team to have a position battle.
You must not have been around when he got benched.I haven't read this whole thread but I haven't seen anything that points to Murray being a cancer in the clubhouse.
But, really, we both know, don't we?I have no idea how he would respond to being a back up Stout.
That's more than likely why he's not talking. Doesn't mean he's a cancer in the clubhouse. If I'm paying a guy $50m I'd rather he wore my uniform and wasn't sitting on his couch.You must not have been around when he got benched.
But, really, we both know, don't we?