The Passing Game Under Brissett

Crimson Warrior

Ready For The Next Chapter
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
9,665
Reaction score
12,886
Location
Home of the Thunder
I think JB coming in on a heater is skewing the analysis of the other components of the passing game some.

He's a career 85.0 passer over 1850 attempts. He's going to regress back to that eventually.

However, he's revealed a few of truths:

Positives:

1. Both DP and the WRs can capably convert 3rd and very long (15 or more) if given the opportunity. 4 such conversions in two games vs. zero in the previous 30 games. SMH K1.

2. Zay Jones is not cooked. He's a working class man's WR3 probably (7/146/0 in the last two, which over 17 games projects out to 60/1240/0) (33 YPC vs GB wow).

3. Michael Wilson is not the worst WR2 in the history of the NFL (7/88/0 in the last two, which over 17 games projects out to 60/750/0).

Negatives:

1. The pass blocking is suspect. JB courageous, but has taken a beating in his two starts. 8 sacks over two games is too many. Projects out to 68 for a full year.

2. MHJ still not nearly enough of a factor even though we were throwing it all over the yard these last two games (4/90/0 in 1.4 games (went out in Q2 of game one), which over 17 games projects out to 49/1093/0)


Side Notes:

1. McBride still the focus of the passing game. (18/146/3 for these last two, which over 17 games projects out to 153/1240/26). Wow. McBride averaging 12 targets per game these last two, vs. seven targets per game previous to Brissett taking over.
 
Last edited:

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,653
Reaction score
38,761
Location
Orlando, FL
I think JB coming in on a heater is skewing the analysis of the other components of the passing game some.

He's a career 85.0 passer over 1850 attempts. He's going to regress back to that eventually.

However, he's revealed a few of truths:

Positives:

1. Both DP and the WRs can capably convert 3rd and very long (15 or more) if given the opportunity. 4 such conversions in two games vs. zero in the previous 30 games. SMH K1.

2. Zay Jones is not cooked. He's a working class man's WR3 probably (7/146/0 in the last two, which over 17 games projects out to 60/1240/0) (33 YPC vs GB wow).

3. Michael Wilson is not the worst WR2 in the history of the NFL (7/88/0 in the last two, which over 17 games projects out to 60/750/0).

Negatives:

1. The pass blocking is suspect. JB courageous, but has taken a beating in his two starts. 8 sacks over two games is too many. Projects out to 68 for a full year.

2. MHJ still not nearly enough of a factor even though we were throwing it all over the yard these last two games (4/90/0 in 1.4 games (went out in Q2 of game one), which over 17 games projects out to 49/1093/0)


Side Notes:

1. McBride still the focus of the passing game. (18/146/3 for these last two, which over 17 games projects out to 153/1240/26). Wow. McBride averaging 12 targets per game these last two, vs. seven targets per game previous to Brissett taking over.
The pass blocking is poor, but you have to double team guys when they’re beating your blockers. On those Harrison stats he was wide open on 2 misses at least that were on Brissett.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
9,774
Reaction score
6,802
Location
Iowa
JB's experience in NE must have been a good preparation for the sieve that is the Cardinal OLine. Despite that DP schemed up some good Bam runs to the left off tackle against Green Bay.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
17,065
Reaction score
19,133
MHJ still not nearly enough of a factor
super curious to know if Drew:

actively thinks about how defensive attention to MHJ and Trey can be used to regularly spring guys open

or

team X plays this kind of coverage usually, this offensive route combo will take advantage of that


i get it unlikely to be 100% of one or the other, but it sure feels like its way more the latter
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,702
Reaction score
3,509
Location
Charleston, SC
1. The pass blocking is suspect. JB courageous, but has taken a beating in his two starts. 8 sacks over two games is too many. Projects out to 68 for a full year.
Yes, pass blocking for a QB who likes to release in under 2 seconds, less than 5 yds past the LOS is a very different assignment than pass blocking for a big guy who will hang in the pocket and let routes develop.

The season projection for sacks is skewed, because JB doesn't have to stare down Micah Parsons vs. Evan Brown every week.

JB (and no Conner) has shown us we need a better OL, we desperately need a big, strong-pocket-presence QB, and a backfield with RB's who can actually pass block. Michael Carter is getting smoked out there.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
38,148
Reaction score
11,144
Location
Scottsdale
Ugh...I haven't seen anyone suggest JB should be our franchise QB, or that he is nothing more than a journeyman NFL backup. Quite the contrary, it's precisely who JB is that is fueling this entire debate!
As I posted previously, show me - someone...ANYONE, a successful NFL QB (Success = consistent winner as in putting up more W's than L's, and has been to the post season and won post season games), who resembled, even remotely, the style of QB play of Murray. It literally doesn't exist... But, because Murray possesses extraordinary physical tools, we've been led to believe (and some here will do to their graves believing...), that Murray will be the first NFL QB in the history of the game, who doesn't need to be under center and doesn't need to be a consistent & effective pocket-passer. I won't mention his inability to effectively read defenses in ways that ensure he delivers the ball to the right receiver - on time. None of that matters because of his extraordinary physical skills.

Of course, his physical skills have been rendered useless for the most part, because the NFL isn't college and it sure as hell isn't high school. Murray can't out-physical his opponents in the NFL. He can't out-run them and his arm isn't strong enough to compensate for all of his other glaring shortcomings. And I while Murray "seems" to get along OK with his fellow players, the eye-test tells me he is not at all the type of leader most other successful NFL QB's often are. Murray has rarely, if ever lifted his teammates to greater heights. He's never contributed to fellow teammates producing at levels above their skill-level and above expectations. In fact, given JB's performance, it can be said Murray was negatively impacted performances of certain players (see Zay Jones and Michael Wilson).

Anyway... There is no way Mike B and management will be find a way to rationalize Murray's presence on the roster next year. This season is toast and the rest of the year is going to be anything but fun. It is what it is... I don't have all the answers, but I hope the team finds a way to create some measure of success next year. I mean, JB's performance certainly suggests the team can be marginally competitive with an actual, legit NFL QB, even if it's a journeyman career back-up.
 
OP
OP
Crimson Warrior

Crimson Warrior

Ready For The Next Chapter
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
9,665
Reaction score
12,886
Location
Home of the Thunder
Ugh...I haven't seen anyone suggest JB should be our franchise QB, or that he is nothing more than a journeyman NFL backup. Quite the contrary, it's precisely who JB is that is fueling this entire debate!
As I posted previously, show me - someone...ANYONE, a successful NFL QB (Success = consistent winner as in putting up more W's than L's, and has been to the post season and won post season games), who resembled, even remotely, the style of QB play of Murray. It literally doesn't exist... But, because Murray possesses extraordinary physical tools, we've been led to believe (and some here will do to their graves believing...), that Murray will be the first NFL QB in the history of the game, who doesn't need to be under center and doesn't need to be a consistent & effective pocket-passer. I won't mention his inability to effectively read defenses in ways that ensure he delivers the ball to the right receiver - on time. None of that matters because of his extraordinary physical skills.

Of course, his physical skills have been rendered useless for the most part, because the NFL isn't college and it sure as hell isn't high school. Murray can't out-physical his opponents in the NFL. He can't out-run them and his arm isn't strong enough to compensate for all of his other glaring shortcomings. And I while Murray "seems" to get along OK with his fellow players, the eye-test tells me he is not at all the type of leader most other successful NFL QB's often are. Murray has rarely, if ever lifted his teammates to greater heights. He's never contributed to fellow teammates producing at levels above their skill-level and above expectations. In fact, given JB's performance, it can be said Murray was negatively impacted performances of certain players (see Zay Jones and Michael Wilson).

Anyway... There is no way Mike B and management will be find a way to rationalize Murray's presence on the roster next year. This season is toast and the rest of the year is going to be anything but fun. It is what it is... I don't have all the answers, but I hope the team finds a way to create some measure of success next year. I mean, JB's performance certainly suggests the team can be marginally competitive with an actual, legit NFL QB, even if it's a journeyman career back-up.

Can we not turn this into a Murray thread please?
 
OP
OP
Crimson Warrior

Crimson Warrior

Ready For The Next Chapter
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
9,665
Reaction score
12,886
Location
Home of the Thunder
super curious to know if Drew:

actively thinks about how defensive attention to MHJ and Trey can be used to regularly spring guys open

or

team X plays this kind of coverage usually, this offensive route combo will take advantage of that


i get it unlikely to be 100% of one or the other, but it sure feels like its way more the latter

I think I agree. They are clearly still running the offense through McBride.

Also, both of Big Play Trey's TDs must have been great play calls because he was wide, wide open on both.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,653
Reaction score
38,761
Location
Orlando, FL
Ugh...I haven't seen anyone suggest JB should be our franchise QB, or that he is nothing more than a journeyman NFL backup. Quite the contrary, it's precisely who JB is that is fueling this entire debate!
As I posted previously, show me - someone...ANYONE, a successful NFL QB (Success = consistent winner as in putting up more W's than L's, and has been to the post season and won post season games), who resembled, even remotely, the style of QB play of Murray. It literally doesn't exist... But, because Murray possesses extraordinary physical tools, we've been led to believe (and some here will do to their graves believing...), that Murray will be the first NFL QB in the history of the game, who doesn't need to be under center and doesn't need to be a consistent & effective pocket-passer. I won't mention his inability to effectively read defenses in ways that ensure he delivers the ball to the right receiver - on time. None of that matters because of his extraordinary physical skills.

Of course, his physical skills have been rendered useless for the most part, because the NFL isn't college and it sure as hell isn't high school. Murray can't out-physical his opponents in the NFL. He can't out-run them and his arm isn't strong enough to compensate for all of his other glaring shortcomings. And I while Murray "seems" to get along OK with his fellow players, the eye-test tells me he is not at all the type of leader most other successful NFL QB's often are. Murray has rarely, if ever lifted his teammates to greater heights. He's never contributed to fellow teammates producing at levels above their skill-level and above expectations. In fact, given JB's performance, it can be said Murray was negatively impacted performances of certain players (see Zay Jones and Michael Wilson).

Anyway... There is no way Mike B and management will be find a way to rationalize Murray's presence on the roster next year. This season is toast and the rest of the year is going to be anything but fun. It is what it is... I don't have all the answers, but I hope the team finds a way to create some measure of success next year. I mean, JB's performance certainly suggests the team can be marginally competitive with an actual, legit NFL QB, even if it's a journeyman career back-up.
Actually I wrote it on 10/18, “I’m not going to say the journeyman, Brissett, is better than Murray, but he will handle the Packs’ rush better.” I’ll give you a old example, Fran Tarkenton. His team went 12-2 in 1973 & 1975. He did take snaps under center, but ran around forever to elude rushers. Check him out on YouTube. As to Murray, I believe he will indeed be gone.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
38,148
Reaction score
11,144
Location
Scottsdale
Actually I wrote it on 10/18, “I’m not going to say the journeyman, Brissett, is better than Murray, but he will handle the Packs’ rush better.” I’ll give you an old example, Fran Tarkenton. His team went 12-2 in 1973 & 1975. He did take snaps under center, but ran around forever to elude rushers. Check him out on YouTube. As to Murray, I believe he will indeed be gone.
Harry… I’m 61. Old enough to remember Tarkenton very well. He was indeed a scrambling man, but against defenders who ran at half the speed of today’s defenders and were not even in the same universe with defenders of today in terms of athleticism.

Fran Tarkenton today? Would struggle to get off the practice squad.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
80,458
Reaction score
36,000
Location
Killjoy Central
There sure was for Seattle on how to go after the statue
Kurt Warner was a statue. He went to three Super Bowls with a career rushing total of only 286 yards in his career.

Jacoby has 1,000 rushing yards in his career as comparison. He scrambles when he has to.
 

Dback Jon

ASFN's Don Quixote
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
96,030
Reaction score
57,414
Location
South Scottsdale
Kurt Warner was a statue. He went to three Super Bowls with a career rushing total of only 286 yards in his career.

Jacoby has 1,000 rushing yards in his career as comparison. He scrambles when he has to.
You’re seriously comparing Kurt Warner to Jacoby Brisette?

Warner also had a incredibly quick release time well Jacoby is on the lower end of release times
But Jacobystans like you won’t acknowledge that
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
80,458
Reaction score
36,000
Location
Killjoy Central
You’re seriously comparing Kurt Warner to Jacoby Brisette?

Warner also had a incredibly quick release time well Jacoby is on the lower end of release times
But Jacobystans like you won’t acknowledge that
Comparing him to another Cards' QB not known for running much. Carson Palmer has only 474 career rushing yards if you like that better.
 
Top