The Case for Taking Simpson Third

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,777
Reaction score
4,448
Location
VA
The Simpson story is almost the exact opposite of the Bailey story. Simpson was great for the first two thirds of the season and marginal for the last third. There are 2 schools of thought on why. Some believe the defenses just caught up to him. Others believe the accumulation of injuries lowered his capabilities.

Simpson is the son of a college coach and he was well trained. His throwing mechanics are nearly textbook. He can read defenses, anticipate blitzes, use hot reads and identify coverage advantages. He has a quick release, while exhibiting excellent ball placement. This has provided receivers with an exceptional opportunity for YAC. Simpson does a good job of moving safeties with his eyes. He’s impressive when maneuvering in the pocket; reminiscent of Drew Brees. This enables him to avoid quick sacks and allowing receivers to get greater separation. It also gives him better throwing lanes. When he faces tight coverage he has good touch to drop the ball into layered defenses. The first 9 games of the season he was almost unstoppable.

The Oklahoma game seemed to change everything. They decided to treat Simpson like an NFL QB and began disguising their defenses; often shifting at the last moment. It disoriented Simpson who had his worst game to date. This trend continued for the remainder of Alabama’s games. Simpson never looked like he did in those first 9 games. His completion percentage dropped from 70 to 57. In fairness to Simpson we’ve subsequently learned he was dealing with a number of health issues that may have somewhat impaired his performance. That said with a 17 NFL game schedule, no QB is likely to be fully healthy for the last third of the season. Playing hurt effectively is critical.

There are other concerns about Simpson. He does not have an extremely strong arm. On throws under 30 yards, he’s very accurate. On longer throws he’s erratic. He showed he can get the ball there, but not consistently on target. Occasionally he locks on receivers, telegraphing his target.

He also has a turnover issue not only with interceptions, but he fumbled in 5 straight games. Some of the interceptions come from timing. He often waits until the receiver comes out of his break to throw the ball giving the defender a chance to jump the route. He recognizes rush gaps and can escape, but not with great acceleration. He is especially troubled by mid line rushers. In fairness many QBs are.

I’ve saved the biggest concern for last. I cannot find a successful NFL QB with 15 or fewer college starts. If you consider Murray successful, he only stated 17. Through the first 9 games Simpson inspired a number evaluators to believe that he could change the paradigm. Once teams started to disguise defenses many reversed their opinion. Simpson could surprise evaluators and be the first one of this group to succeed. However, do you want to risk pick number 3 to find out, especially without a great QB guru in place?
Cam went 14-0 at Auburn. We dont count those community college starts
 

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,777
Reaction score
4,448
Location
VA
You made your own point.

Warner didn't go straight to NFL - got cut by Packers.
He then had 50 starts in Arena league and NFL Europe

The point is - there are zero QB's that have been successful in the NFL with less than 15 starts before the NFL.
Do we think the Cardinals are the team to break that record? :biglaugh:
Cam
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
2,132
Reaction score
4,629
Location
VA
I’ve saved the biggest concern for last. I cannot find a successful NFL QB with 15 or fewer college starts. If you consider Murray successful, he only stated 17. Through the first 9 games Simpson inspired a number evaluators to believe that he could change the paradigm. Once teams started to disguise defenses many reversed their opinion. Simpson could surprise evaluators and be the first one of this group to succeed. However, do you want to risk pick number 3 to find out, especially without a great QB guru in place?
You must be registered for see images attach
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
13,029
Reaction score
17,256
Location
Charlotte
Cam went 14-0 at Auburn. We dont count those community college starts

Of course you count them - he started is career at Florida (edited), then Blinn JC, and then Auburn.

26 college starts.

The point is experience starting games before you get to the NFL.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
15,880
Reaction score
36,323
Location
Orlando, FL
Cam went 14-0 at Auburn. We dont count those community college starts
Why? It’s Junior College. These places have all the kids who typically can’t meet the admissions standard of the big schools. Some of these players are actually better than the ones in the traditional college settings. The ones in the playoffs are especially talented. It’s certainly as good as the lower college divisions and guys like Flacco came from there. Is it as valuable as sitting on the bench in Division 1, like Simpson did? It’s maybe better. So I think it’s not that straight forward.
 

Sparky16

All Star
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Posts
882
Reaction score
954
Location
Phoenix
I'm almost set on a defender or lineman with our first pick...then trading back into the first from 34 to get a QB...rather it's Simpson, Beck, Allar..whatever...that 5th year is especially valuable for quarterbacks.

But if we do that it's tough to decide rather to stick at 3 or try and trade back to around ten....
Almost feels like trade back...then use the gained compensation to trade up from 34...
Allar is trash
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
5,152
Reaction score
3,136
The Simpson story is almost the exact opposite of the Bailey story. Simpson was great for the first two thirds of the season and marginal for the last third. There are 2 schools of thought on why. Some believe the defenses just caught up to him. Others believe the accumulation of injuries lowered his capabilities.

Simpson is the son of a college coach and he was well trained. His throwing mechanics are nearly textbook. He can read defenses, anticipate blitzes, use hot reads and identify coverage advantages. He has a quick release, while exhibiting excellent ball placement. This has provided receivers with an exceptional opportunity for YAC. Simpson does a good job of moving safeties with his eyes. He’s impressive when maneuvering in the pocket; reminiscent of Drew Brees. This enables him to avoid quick sacks and allowing receivers to get greater separation. It also gives him better throwing lanes. When he faces tight coverage he has good touch to drop the ball into layered defenses. The first 9 games of the season he was almost unstoppable.

The Oklahoma game seemed to change everything. They decided to treat Simpson like an NFL QB and began disguising their defenses; often shifting at the last moment. It disoriented Simpson who had his worst game to date. This trend continued for the remainder of Alabama’s games. Simpson never looked like he did in those first 9 games. His completion percentage dropped from 70 to 57. In fairness to Simpson we’ve subsequently learned he was dealing with a number of health issues that may have somewhat impaired his performance. That said with a 17 NFL game schedule, no QB is likely to be fully healthy for the last third of the season. Playing hurt effectively is critical.

There are other concerns about Simpson. He does not have an extremely strong arm. On throws under 30 yards, he’s very accurate. On longer throws he’s erratic. He showed he can get the ball there, but not consistently on target. Occasionally he locks on receivers, telegraphing his target.

He also has a turnover issue not only with interceptions, but he fumbled in 5 straight games. Some of the interceptions come from timing. He often waits until the receiver comes out of his break to throw the ball giving the defender a chance to jump the route. He recognizes rush gaps and can escape, but not with great acceleration. He is especially troubled by mid line rushers. In fairness many QBs are.

I’ve saved the biggest concern for last. I cannot find a successful NFL QB with 15 or fewer college starts. If you consider Murray successful, he only stated 17. Through the first 9 games Simpson inspired a number evaluators to believe that he could change the paradigm. Once teams started to disguise defenses many reversed their opinion. Simpson could surprise evaluators and be the first one of this group to succeed. However, do you want to risk pick number 3 to find out, especially without a great QB guru in place?
Hi Harry, hes been compared to Baker Mayfield. Is that an accurate comparison?
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
16,867
Reaction score
9,618
I would take simpson over love from nd

Least he is decent size for a qb and good arm
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
15,880
Reaction score
36,323
Location
Orlando, FL
Hi Harry, hes been compared to Baker Mayfield. Is that an accurate comparison?
Not really. Mayfield is a proven running threat. He also seems to throw better when rolling out. I think Simpson may read defenses better. They are about the same in the pocket. Remember Mayfield struggled for a while before he adapted his game to the NFL. Simpson may need even more polishing.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,103,314
Posts
6,250,676
Members
6,415
Latest member
ABR
Back
Top