Suns 2025-2026 Season Discussion

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,834
Reaction score
7,496
Houston having a huge amount of our draft capitol and us sending Durant to them (as his preferred destination) and not geting those picks back is embarrassing.

It has been widely reported that Houston made that trade with the Nets SPECIFICALLY so they could leverage them to get Durant or Booker... and all we came away with was the 10th pick in a weak draft...

If Maluach doesn't pan out we would have been better off waiving KD. The price of dealing with Houston should have been our picks back... and if we don't get em... screw it, send him somewhere else or sit on him and let him walk in a year.

"Doing good" by KD did nothing but screw us over and massively benefit Houston. They kept our picks, they still got KD and they're going to draft in the top 10 repeatedly by virture of our failings.
Just because we made a bad trade in getting Durant in the first place does not mean that we should expect another team to make a bad trade in getting Durant from us. Durant is two years older now. And those two years make a huge difference in trade value as well. The trade with Houston was not the bad part of this situation. I am convinced is the best we could do. The big problem is that we should not have traded for Durant in the first place.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,404
Reaction score
21,247
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
Just because we made a bad trade in getting Durant in the first place does not mean that we should expect another team to make a bad trade in getting Durant from us. Durant is two years older now. And those two years make a huge difference in trade value as well. The trade with Houston was not the bad part of this situation. I am convinced is the best we could do. The big problem is that we should not have traded for Durant in the first place.

It was a bad trade with Houston though. Throw in either Jabari Smith Jr, a Suns 1st, or swap VanVleet for Jalen and it's much less bad. The problem isn't KD's trade value it's how we allowed him to determine where he'd land. A deal with Minnesota would have given us more.

Maluach was the main takeaway for the Suns.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,618
Reaction score
73,918
The big problem is that we should not have traded for Durant in the first place.

No doubt about it, but at this point, it's water under the bridge.

Also, this topic has been discussed to exhaustion.

Competing with worse recent trades by the Suns, is the Beal and Ayton trades.
 

BooksOrangePlanet

I was BirdGangThing
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
39,898
Reaction score
44,949
Location
Arcadia
kd is gone - beal gone - ayton and the twins gone gone gone - cp3 was long gone - sarver's gone - monty's gone - everybody not named devin booker is gone - can we please finally move on
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,404
Reaction score
21,247
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
No doubt about it, but at this point, it's water under the bridge.

Also, this topic has been discussed to exhaustion.

Competing with worse recent trades by the Suns, is the Beal and Ayton trades.

I think the main difference between the KD trade and the Ayton and Beal trades is how much worse the KD trade is in a vacuum. We gave up a ton for an over the hill sidekick. The Beal trade was an upgrade in talent but clearly we had no intention of seeing it through to the end of his contract. The Ayton trade was bad because we had better options a year earlier that we passed on and his value plummeted.

Ishbia has struck out with those 3 those moves. Here's to hoping he'll be more patient this next at bat. Fortuneately/Unfortunately we aren't in a good spot so he has a few years to figure it out. He needs to stop making the hole we're in larger.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,618
Reaction score
73,918
I think the main difference between the KD trade and the Ayton and Beal trades is how much worse the KD trade is in a vacuum. We gave up a ton for an over the hill sidekick. The Beal trade was an upgrade in talent but clearly we had no intention of seeing it through to the end of his contract. The Ayton trade was bad because we had better options a year earlier that we passed on and his value plummeted.

Ishbia has struck out with those 3 those moves. Here's to hoping he'll be more patient this next at bat. Fortuneately/Unfortunately we aren't in a good spot so he has a few years to figure it out. He needs to stop making the hole we're in larger.

It sort of feels like Mat Ishbia wants to blame this on the past Suns past administration without saying it… former GM James Jones and start with a fresh slate.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,404
Reaction score
21,247
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
It sort of feels like Mat Ishbia wants to blame this on the past Suns past administration without saying it… former GM James Jones and start with a fresh slate.

It's a tough spot because JJ is in the league office now. Throwing him under the bus won't help the Suns at all. I think most fans who pay attention know JJ is responsible for a nice chunk of the problems. How much is up for debate but he's definitely responsible to some extent. Hopefully it was the lion's share and things improve. Ishbia bought himself as clean of slate as he'll get.
 

clyde2tw

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 27, 2023
Posts
1,056
Reaction score
997
Location
abroad
Nothing is worse than the Beal trade, given the roster situation then. KD trade per se was a bit overpay, but the idea to pair him with Book was OK though. But Beal trade was likely KD related. I recall Irvine was not happy after trade to Mavs, and expressed desire to join Suns in the offseason, while Mavs was said to like DA. Cut CP3, swap DA with KI sign and trade, a KD/DB/KI core with Payne, Okogie, Camara, Shamet's expiring contract, and MLE to use, the situation was not that bad.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,618
Reaction score
73,918
@Hoop Head

I was going to give you a "like" on one of your posts when I saw your reaction score was 17,777.

I'll let someone else do it, as I don't want to be a jinx. ;)

It's hard to beat four 7s.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,618
Reaction score
73,918
Here is some video on Reggie Upshaw who has been named Player Development and Video Coordinating Assistant for the Suns.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,618
Reaction score
73,918
Bad headline. The return for KD is very underwhelming but the "future" was traded away 2 years ago. That said, the trading of the 2031 pick at the deadline was abominably stupid... regardless though, all of that damage was prior to this off season.

Yeah, the Suns seemingly made that trade with the Jazz to replace Nurkic and never did during the 2024-25 season.

And indeed, their future was traded away in 2023.
 

95pro

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
14,991
Reaction score
5,923
Good. ESPN has been comically wrong in regards to how we'd compete during the KD error. Calling us out now without acknowledging how they co-signed each move that got us here is rich.

I just dont even if its from espn or SI.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,618
Reaction score
73,918
Per a report, Mat Ishbia and the Suns are rejecting the demands of two limited partners to be bought out.

Anyhow, this is how I interpret it.

The details are in Gerald Bourguet's free to read article which has a link below.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,404
Reaction score
21,247
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
Per a report, Mat Ishbia and the Suns are rejecting the demands of two limited partners to be bought out.

Anyhow, this is how I interpret it.

The details are in Gerald Bourguet's free to read article which has a link below.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

This is why I never bought into the "Ishbia is going broke" narrative that popped up. He has his brother only own roughly 60% of the Suns. While they shelled out a lot of cash for that they didn't pay $4 billion or whatever the sale price was, they paid 60% of that. I'm a little surprised they didn't buy out the other owners to get a larger stake but they don't have to. The other owners had the chance to be bought out when Sarver sold, from what was known, but wanted to ride along while Ishbia opened his wallet. Now they want out but Ishbia isn't obligated to meet their requests.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
15,128
This is why I never bought into the "Ishbia is going broke" narrative that popped up. He has his brother only own roughly 60% of the Suns. While they shelled out a lot of cash for that they didn't pay $4 billion or whatever the sale price was, they paid 60% of that. I'm a little surprised they didn't buy out the other owners to get a larger stake but they don't have to. The other owners had the chance to be bought out when Sarver sold, from what was known, but wanted to ride along while Ishbia opened his wallet. Now they want out but Ishbia isn't obligated to meet their requests.

I could absolutely believe that they might be strapped for free cash. I have little doubt that the vast majority of their fortunes are attached to assets that they'd have to sell if they needed to shell out millions and millions of dollars.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,618
Reaction score
73,918
This is why I never bought into the "Ishbia is going broke" narrative that popped up. He has his brother only own roughly 60% of the Suns. While they shelled out a lot of cash for that they didn't pay $4 billion or whatever the sale price was, they paid 60% of that. I'm a little surprised they didn't buy out the other owners to get a larger stake but they don't have to. The other owners had the chance to be bought out when Sarver sold, from what was known, but wanted to ride along while Ishbia opened his wallet. Now they want out but Ishbia isn't obligated to meet their requests.

As I read it, the two limited partners want to sell their interest in the franchise to Mat Ishbia for the newly increased value.

That's a pretty good chunk of change… $825 million.
 
Top