So do we start Beck?

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Most here would be betting the under on projected wins.

With that in mind do we let Brissett walk and start Beck from day one? Shouldn’t we want to get a complete grade on him in 2026? Does it do us any good to let him sit and learn?

Would starting him send the wrong message to the veterans? Or would it be better to wait until things go sideways.

This is probably the worse part. It casts a huge cloud of just what to do.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
14,972
Reaction score
13,038
I am still of the belief Jacoby played pretty well last year. That is what the stats and my eyes say.

Nobody seems to agree with me, and I can’t understand why.

If your goal is to tank start beck, if your goal is to win start Jacoby.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,296
Reaction score
13,958
As they sit on a mountain of cap space, with gaping holes still on offense and everywhere on D, this theory is as solid as any other.
I only see RT as a hole and QB as a gaping hole on offense. While I don't think he is, Beck could solve the QB issue. I would have loved to see a tackle drafted, but their only choice was to draft one at 3 and none was available after that without trading assets that they couldn't afford to lose...

Also, it's not like there was a lot of RTs in the free agent market worth splurging on.

Now defense on the other hand, I completely agree with you.
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
2,305
Reaction score
5,111
Location
VA
He's going to compete and he's going to lose. Jacoby and Minshew are way more polished and Beck is a bad teammate, I'm confident he wont win the job.
 
OP
OP
slanidrac16

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I am still of the belief Jacoby played pretty well last year. That is what the stats and my eyes say.

Nobody seems to agree with me, and I can’t understand why.

If your goal is to tank start beck, if your goal is to win start Jacoby.
This!
 

THESMEL

Smushdown! Take it like a fan!
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
6,139
Reaction score
1,364
Location
Vernon
Well Kyler was forced out by media and fans emotion- paying 57 million for fing nothing - never seen reason enough to cut him. So Beck is best available player - probably - I think his championships and experience counts for a lot. Very well could beat out our other qbs.
Good pick, it’s qb man, could beat out Mendoza and Simpson also. Good roll of the dice, only time will tell.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
22,460
Reaction score
15,125
My guess is... halftime, week... uhh... 7.

Probably goes back to the bench by week 12.
 

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
33,021
Reaction score
7,879
Location
Super Scottsdale
Well Kyler was forced out by media and fans emotion- paying 57 million for fing nothing - never seen reason enough to cut him. So Beck is best available player - probably - I think his championships and experience counts for a lot. Very well could beat out our other qbs.
Good pick, it’s qb man, could beat out Mendoza and Simpson also. Good roll of the dice, only time will tell.

I don't think Kyler was forced out by media and fans. He was a great QB til he got to the pros/us. It didn't work out here. And that is the reason to let him go. Will it work out somewhere else? I hope so for Kyler.

We needed a QB and we got one. My main concern is the reports that he is a loner and stays to himself. We need a leader in the locker room, not a taller Kyler Murray.

And the Cardinals LOVE paying a lot for nothing. And I hate it. Would really LOVE for someone to pay me for doing nothing, lol.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
11,067
Reaction score
14,402
Location
York, PA
Sooner rather than later you need to play him to see what you have. Because you need to draft another QB in 2027 if he’s not the answer. I’ve never been a Beck guy, but now that you’ve drafted him, you have no choice but to play him.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,410
Reaction score
2,182
Location
117 and Loving It
Let them fight it out for QB1. I don't like Beck. I can learn to like him if he performs but I just don't see it. But this is a terrible QB room. Fight it out. The weapons are there. The OL is improved.

I don't like Beck but Kurt's overview on him being a "lift and drop" passer post surgery makes me think he could unlock MHJ who can't catch a zipped pass to save his life. MW is a precise route guy and Beck can deliver fast. With Love, and with chipping for the RT in pass pro, let's see what Beck has. He may fit they system, MLF has his hands full but let these guys fight it out and pick a starter before game 1. Even if it has to be Uncle Rico.

I don't like him, but he has a lot of the tools to be good. Brain and attitude aren't usually coachable, but I don't like the room anyway.
 

sdscard4

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Posts
3,692
Reaction score
2,743
Location
Louisville
I am still of the belief Jacoby played pretty well last year. That is what the stats and my eyes say.

Nobody seems to agree with me, and I can’t understand why.

If your goal is to tank start beck, if your goal is to win start Jacoby.
1-13
Aint winning with Jacoby. Movie is over. Sequel is always worse than the original
 

Outerlimits

Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2019
Posts
460
Reaction score
1,045
Location
Richmond Virginia
Brissett has proven he can take numerous hits and somehow survive.(and sometimes connect with receivers before getting clobbered) So give the guy a bit of a pay raise and send him out there week 1 when the team is 0-0 and at least technically trying to be competitive. Little chance Beck gives the team a better chance to win over Jacoby or even Minshew early in season. ( i fully expect Beck will be playing by the end of October at the latest though)
 
Last edited:

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
22,460
Reaction score
15,125
I am still of the belief Jacoby played pretty well last year. That is what the stats and my eyes say.

Nobody seems to agree with me, and I can’t understand why.

If your goal is to tank start beck, if your goal is to win start Jacoby.

They are rolling into the season with gobs of space, tons of holes and a bottom 3 QB room.

Their goal is not to win.

Jacoby can play well when he is down 20 and the opposition lightens up, with happened last year a LOT.

Personally, I doubt Beck can play well at all. But I think Beck will get a look relatively early. Once we're like 3 or 4 games under .500 (so... week 6 or 7) I would imagine they'd make a swap.
 

JustWinBaby

Veteran
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Posts
493
Reaction score
71
Location
Buckeye, Az
I am not fond of Beck but he has been a winner on the biggest college stage for quite a while. I like Jacoby but he did very little winning. I prefer winning. I can swallow my dislke with wins.

This appears to be the head coaches choice. I am for starting him day one. It's not like we are going for a repeat or are we?
 

Zalixar

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
4,608
Reaction score
7,376
Location
OC
1-13
Aint winning with Jacoby. Movie is over. Sequel is always worse than the original

Jacoby can play well when he is down 20 and the opposition lightens up, with happened last year a LOT.

I know these points are repeated as nausem, but did we all watch the same NFL season?

Colts were almost the best team for half the season, smoking most everyone (before their injuries of course), we were competitive and went down to the wire on the road. Beat the 1 seeded Broncos, and the Rams too if not for flipping a td a la Demarcardo.

The Packers, a playoff team, we were competitive and also went down to the wire. Damn that Parsons, stopped by essentially the best defensive player in the NFL.

Smoked the Cowboys on Monday night. Coincidentally the one game we had a few pieces back on defense (and Nolen), but also some reinjuries. Cool.

Jaguars, a playoff team, we were competitive and also went down to wire.

Bucs, almost and should have been a playoff team, and was the previous year, was sloppy overall but still "competitive." One of the few teams to beat the Hawks.

Texans had one of the best defenses I've seen in awhile, we all saw that center stage. There's no way we would do anything vs them, but our defense showed that Stroud was the second coming of Montana, for a game.

Falcons, while not a bad team, even beat the Rams, was also competitive game. Go go Bijan.

Bengals a bit of Jekyl and Hyde, especially with injuries, but yeah everyone completely fell apart here. They put up 30-40+ points in the several weeks before us as well. Jacoby didn't even get to "pad" here vs their atrocious D.

I'll just summarize the Rams, Hawks, and 9ers. Yeah, it was a bit close earlier before the wheels came off, and no Kyler did not look good either, but these 3 teams were all top 5 in NFL, and Rams/Hawks were exceptionally good in general, especially the Hawks. Absolutely no chance.


We all know Cards were one of the most injured teams, including defense and RB room.

Can Jacoby play defense? No. Who was his starting RB? Everyone says we had a bad oline. Is that a good recipe for any QB? You think any Joe Blow would have done better much better? Sure, if we had a Burrow, or Brady, or Stafford, or other elite Qb we probably nab some of those close ones. I wish we had one.

Most of the games were close enough for a coin flip against decently talented teams. Other "bad teams" were way way way worse in that department.

To say he padded stats is ridiculous. I would hope he'd get some love for battling it out for this crummy team. He even showed Wilson has some juice, did any one us know that before this season? He "padded" vs elite of the elite for a few games, sure. Would you rather him phone it in instead? Then you'd all really go after him. And that's what he's known for? Selective memory.
 
Last edited:
Top