Discussion in 'University of Arizona' started by TJ, Feb 17, 2021.
As long as daddy Mobley stops reproducing, they’ll go back to the cellar
This should have been Miller's philosophy years ago. This team for the most part should completely be back next year, the only question mark is Mautherin. They have 3 pretty solid looking guards coming in next year so they should be really deep in back court and wing. I think the bigs they have can be sufficient if the coaching staff can continue to develop them. That is the biggest criticism of Miller in my opinion, he hasn't been able to make guys better (develop) from the time they hit Tucson to when they leave because one and dones aren't concerned about development. They are just showcasing their game to NBA scouts. The G League should help by removing kids who have no business on a college campus so Miller and staff need to do a much better job of developing the guys they bring in and make sure they buy into his system and are good fits to the returning squads.
I only saw the end of the game but it seemed to me the problem was things not totally on Enfield, like bad FT shooting including literally their best shooter, Baumann, missing 2 after they called a T on Koloko. Arizona making half their 3's including guys like Terry and Brown who have been struggling of late.
The strategy part in when I was watching is Miller just refused to let I Mobley do anything, when he got the ball they aggressively doubled him every time. They double E Mobley too of course but with I they are doubling him to try and turn him over. He didn't do that much but he was just completely unable to punish them for doubling. When he scores well, USC is unbeatable, when he doesn't they're human and seemed like that was a big factor.
It's also just matchups USC has tons of bigs but nobody like Jaquez that the UA bigs can't defend, so they matchup better even with the size of the Mobleys. and didn't hurt that miller played Jordan Brown big minutes and he responded with a huge game
Crickets from the athletic department. Heeke doesn’t do contracts during the season, which is dumb. There’s also chatter that the ABOR might challenge a Miller extension.
This needs to be resolved immediately after the season.
It’s tricky with the IARP ruling yet to come down. Nobody seems to know the timeline but I’d guess they tack on a year after the season.
UCLA fans would appreciate an Arizona win tonight please!
The gymnastics coach got a raise. So much for Heeke's committment to his philosophy
Altman has had our number for years.
Really good coach. Don't like him at all as I've said before I 100% believe he used Covid to duck games earlier in the year when Richardson was hurt. Now they have to play the makeup games but as a result his team is fresher. UCLA finishes with the 3 best teams other than UCLA in the conf. Colorado got them thanks to Wright, they gotta at least split Oregon and USC and based on USC's size that probably means best chance is solve the press and matchup zone of Oregon and win.
Arizona only turned it over 9 times the reason you lost is Oregon shot so well from 3. Last year I argued Duarte was a pro prospect and should have left, he's very smart to have stayed he's upped his FG% over 10 points and nearly 10 points higher on 3's. Cronin said he's a late first early 2nd rounder and lots of NBA scouts seem to agree. The downside is he's already 23 years old
The chatter is that might’ve been Miller’s last name.
You mean game?
And who is chattering?
The birds are chirping that he’s not getting an extension and it doesn’t make sense to have a lame duck coach for the recruiting disadvantage. Arizona also has to make the NOA public which would look bad if you’re about to re-sign the coach who oversaw that mess.
Not quite. That’s one option on the table. They’re likely to meet this week to discuss.
Problem is, the boosters would be pissed if CSM is let go, and with how boosters have fallen off the wagon the past decade or so, Arizona has little margin for error and can’t afford (literally ) to piss off anymore.
All three avenues have pros and cons. I still maintain that a short extension is the way to go.
If anyone else were president you’d think the boosters would win out here.
By all means, let’s give an extension to a coach who hasn’t made the tournament in the last three years, got embarrassed in the first round four years ago and who’s dragged the programs name through the mud.
that should turn things right around...
Separate names with a comma.