Pariah said:Guys, the Seahawks played on the very same surface. It is not an advantage for either team.
That's a pretty ridiculous suggestion. What would you suggest you would do to astro-turf to make it totally different than normal? Put oil on it? I suppose in your scenario the Seahawks practiced on an oiled down field to all get perfectly used to it and not slip at all.RedViper said:If the Cardinals knew what to expect with the field turf and then encountered a condition they couldn't have expected (because Seattle f'd with it to their advantage) then the Cards need to scream bloody murder to the league.
With all those Cardinals falling all over the place yesterday, something was definitely not right. Whether that's a result of the Cards cluelessness or the Seahawks cheating, is the only thing that's up for debate in my mind.

Come on. It's field turf. It's not THAT different from stadiul to stadium or week to week. It's just not.MadCardDisease said:Yes they played on the same field. However he Seahawks have the advantage of playing there all the time. I think it can be an advantage. It's the Cardinals fault for not figuring out what the best shoes are to where on this turf.
That's the crushed up old tire material that is spread over the field. That material serves only one purpose - to cushion the field when a player falls. The grassy surface is so long that adding more or less of that material would not make a difference in footing.MadCardDisease said:It did seem like there was a lot of junk getting knocked up during the plays. For a while I thought that they were playing on natual grass and then I remember it was field turf.
Pariah said:Come on. It's field turf. It's not THAT different from stadiul to stadium or week to week. It's just not.
Actually there's a pad under the turf for that. The rubber "gravel" is there presicely for the reason to make the surface less "grabby" and make it behave more like dirt (so that when you plant a foot it doesn't stick in one place when you put thousands of ppounds of tork on it--it slides over the gravel).SeaChicken said:That material serves only one purpose - to cushion the field when a player falls. The grassy surface is so long that adding more or less of that material would not make a difference in footing.
Pariah said:Doesn't matter though. It would be impossible to put so much of that stuff on the field to make it "slippery" enough to be an advantage. That's a laughable theory.
That's not what I said. The field turf is obviously different from grass (but not so much so that it's forgien to NFL players), it's just that field turf is field turf. The seahawks aren't going to manipulate it to their advantage.MadCardDisease said:You mean to tell me that there is no difference to playing on field turf and playing on grass?
Pariah said:it's just that field turf is field turf. The seahawks aren't going to manipulate it to their advantage.
Actually Pariah, I thought the same thing you did until I went to the Los Angeles County Fair this weekend where they were pimpin' this stuff for people who are too lazy to take care of a lawn (California) or don't have the water supply to keep it green (Arizona). You're right, there is padding underneath but the primary purpose is to give it an even base. The rubber chips are there mostly for padding. My wife was interested in it so I had to suffer through a demo. These guys advertised themselves as the people that installed it in Qwest Field (Seattle) and also in St. Louis just this year... so be prepared to play on it again.Pariah said:Actually there's a pad under the turf for that. The rubber "gravel" is there presicely for the reason to make the surface less "grabby" and make it behave more like dirt (so that when you plant a foot it doesn't stick in one place when you put thousands of ppounds of tork on it--it slides over the gravel).
Doesn't matter though. It would be impossible to put so much of that stuff on the field to make it "slippery" enough to be an advantage. That's a laughable theory.
HawkManDan said:OK let me guess this straight.........
SOME people say the Seahawks cheated because of thier field turf, or we manipulated in some way to the Hawks advantage?
YOUR KIDDING ME RIGHT?? Out of all the cop outs and excuses this takes the cake. To say the Hawks cheated is absolutely hillarious! Please dont tell me card fans are so desperate for excuses that they woul actually say Hawks cheated. Did NY cheat also? Did STL? Has every team been cheating the passed 10 years? you gotta be kidding me!!!
RedViper said:With all those Cardinals falling all over the place yesterday, something was definitely not right. Whether that's a result of the Cards cluelessness or the Seahawks cheating, is the only thing that's up for debate in my mind.
RedViper said:I read in an article a few years back when someone was getting field turf, there were ways to manipulate it to one's advantage.
Do I believe a team would cheat. Hell yes. You are talking millions upon millions of dollars. You are looking at two coaches with entire staffs, either of whom could be out on their arse at the end of the season. Their reputation will be absolutely demolished. One of the teams owners comes from a corporation that has literally dominated the globe economically. And they did it through cheating. You've got an industry where cheating is just fair game until the league steps in and does something about it. From stick em, to using vaseline on the jerseys to steriods. Its all just par for the course until it gets shut down.
I threw up two possibilities. One is just pure Cardinals cluelessness. We saw a game with a similar result it O2 on field turf where a QB with a severely fractured ankle was able to shred the Cardinals. Probably it was just our ridiculously inept staff without the slightest friggen clue how to attire its multi-million dollar athletes. But it could have been cheating then too. Its something.