I will. The only "stats" that matter are the ones showing how one QB can run the offense and the other can't. Kyler's done for. He's old news. The season's done for Ws and Ls mean absolutely nothing save in regards to draft picks and maybe keeping/losing a coach's job. Jacoby, against superior teams (Indy and yes, GB--your post above was a startling self-own about GB) put up superior stats. Like, by far. Stats that belittle Kyler and his "accomplishments" this year.
Do you disagree that Jacoby has been better than Kyler this season? Or do pathetic, clinging on for victory with very little offense against two atrocious teams count for more?
Yes, laughing at your assertion is the only rational response.