The Ravens might actually part ways with him and go after a qb. What y’all think? Would be be a good fit here?
But at the same time, this would make the Raven go hard after a qb. No one would though the Ravens would do that.50/50 on that thought.
He is 33 years old, but he is a veteran guy that can win in the right situation. Personally, I do not think he is any better than Carson Palmer, and when I say Carson Palmer, I am saying without the 2015 season on his resume.
It would have to be at the right price, and I am sure another team would sign him to big $$$. The Jaguars or Bills would love to have him, one would think.
He has had that for the past couple of seasons. He’s the main reason why the Ravens haven’t made the playoffs since 2014.Put Joe Flacco on a team with a superior D and you can win enough to get out of your own division and make the play-offs.
I had to dig up his stat sheet. Like a lot of players who are on so-so teams, they are not on the national media hype and it is hard to immediately connect them with their current value. Since the decline of the Raven's D, Flacco has been average at best. Not sure if he can be the guy to put the team on his back and go further toward another SB. He's got some highlight deep TD passes---to go along with plenty of INTs.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FlacJo00.htm
At this point in time, the Cards do not have a single QB under contract so given the choice between nothing and Flacco, I'd take Flacco.
You could make the argument that Bortles is better than Flacco now, as crazy & funny as that sounds.50/50 on that thought.
He is 33 years old, but he is a veteran guy that can win in the right situation. Personally, I do not think he is any better than Carson Palmer, and when I say Carson Palmer, I am saying without the 2015 season on his resume.
It would have to be at the right price, and I am sure another team would sign him to big $$$. The Jaguars or Bills would love to have him, one would think.
You can win with Flacco. Bring him in for a 2nd rounder via trade.
You must be registered for see images attach
So you’re just going to throw the W-L record around with no context huh?Flacco has a W-L record for 102-67 and is a pocket passer. Pair him with DJ and a good defense you can get 5 years of above average QB play. That will be best use of 2nd rounder with a compensatory 3rd round pick in back pocket. I don't think Ravens will give Flacco away for a 2nd round though.
What is it about Flacco that makes you think otherwise.
So you’re just going to throw the W-L record around with no context huh?
Anyway. I more so found it hilarious that you think we should give up a 2nd rounder, then follow that up with saying you don’t think the RAVENS will give away that like he’s actually worth that much when you look at his play ever since he got paid.
........That’s the point, he’s not playing above average. Not even average. If he was, this thread wouldn’t have been made.To put it in context, Flacco is an above average to good QB in all 9 years of his play in NFL. Why would Ravens give away their winingest QB for only a second round pick when he is still playing above average?