Inject positive Cards media into my veins

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,732
Reaction score
13,001
Location
Albq
He is awesome. The ONLY thing is he has GOT to STOP wearing the tank tops. I’m sorry but tank tops on guys just look ridiculous.

Yeah, if you're wearing one while working out, that's fine, otherwise it's just a wife beater.
 

Syracusecards

DA's pass went that way
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Posts
4,187
Reaction score
4,204
Orlovsky needs to make his mind up

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I don’t understand how Dan “Safety Dance” Orlovsky has become the premier analyst for ESPN. He was a terrible QB that couldn’t read a defense or go through his progressions and we are supposed to think he is some sort of football savant? I don’t get it.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
25,761
Reaction score
32,500
Location
BirdGangThing
I don’t understand how Dan “Safety Dance” Orlovsky has become the premier analyst for ESPN. He was a terrible QB that couldn’t read a defense or go through his progressions and we are supposed to think he is some sort of football savant? I don’t get it.
Totally agree. I's been hard enough listening to Matt Hasselbeck...He was an average, at best QB, but at least he took a team to the Super Bowl so he has a little street cred. Orlovsky is an absolute joke. Also, why is Stephen A commenting on anything other than basketball? Just doesn't make sense....Just like Max Kellerman covering anything but boxing. It's okay for networks to hire analysts with a niche. IMO it makes them better, when they just cover what they know, instead of trying to be an expert in everything.
 

Shane

Current STAR
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
66,245
Reaction score
32,457
Location
Las Vegas
I don’t understand how Dan “Safety Dance” Orlovsky has become the premier analyst for ESPN. He was a terrible QB that couldn’t read a defense or go through his progressions and we are supposed to think he is some sort of football savant? I don’t get it.
Totally agree. I's been hard enough listening to Matt Hasselbeck...He was an average, at best QB, but at least he took a team to the Super Bowl so he has a little street cred. Orlovsky is an absolute joke. Also, why is Stephen A commenting on anything other than basketball? Just doesn't make sense....Just like Max Kellerman covering anything but boxing. It's okay for networks to hire analysts with a niche. IMO it makes them better, when they just cover what they know, instead of trying to be an expert in everything.
Just because you were a terrible quarterback doesn’t mean you’re a terrible analyst and don’t know what you’re talking about there’s been plenty of terrible quarterbacks that are awesome coaches. Same principle.

however totally agree on Stephen A and Kellerman.
 

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
14,908
Reaction score
13,213
Orlovsky doesn't believe it himself. He just was forced to take the other side to have an on-air argument. This is lame.
to be fair: he says that Stafford was a teammate and he is sticking with a teammate. Motivated reasoning follows.

Conventional wisdom is that the QB of the #1 seed in the NFL wins MVP. that makes sense to me

i think to get the #1 seed, the Cards can go no worse than 4-1 down the stretch -- and if they go no worse than 4-1 that means K1 plays pretty well.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
537,351
Posts
5,269,511
Members
6,276
Latest member
ConpiracyCard
Top