Okurr. Let me know when the Cardinals are not a laughingstock again. Bears haven’t been in 15 minutes haha
Draft Positioning
- Thread starter Harry
- Start date
Indeed. Just give it time.
Yes. Enjoy the new locker room in 2027
And another thing! I will let you know when they lose to the Tennessee Titans at home.
ASUCHRIS
ONE HEART BEAT!!!
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2002
- Posts
- 20,999
- Reaction score
- 22,858
We, as Cardinals fans are going to attack the nature of other teams wins? Ok.
Let me know when the Cardinals beat a team with a winning record!
Not fair!
Stout
A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
I'm advocating for moving up to get our guy, which should be doable if we're picking top 10. Without a QB, the team is going nowhere. But it may be true that our guy isn't available and we can't trade up. In that case, sure, a RT is an option. And it's always cool to discuss all the options.
Stout
A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Already answered. You are one of the very weird posters right now thinking you can ONLY attain a RT through the draft, and then ONLY in the 1st round, top 10. There are...no other ways to fix the position? Weird. You sound more like the Brownies than I do, sir.
Agree.
I strongly advocated to move up for Sam Darnold some years back...I used to be against it.
But the odds say that two or three average first round picks won't affect your team as much as having the QB position locked down with the right guy.
We go get our QB and let the chips fall as they may....
Don't pass on the chance for a few Robinsons and Collins'
P.S.
My position might be completely different if we drafted like the Ravens of the early 2000's.
But we dont.
Doesn't have to be a OT. Could also be a WR or other offensive players through a trade back. No QB will have sustained success here if the offense isn't improved around him. Let alone a green rookie thrown to the wolves.
With Kyler still on the roster it's difficult to predict FA. Without a team trading for Kyler, the 2026 FA period will be neutered for the Cards. Everything hinges on Kyler getting traded before his 2026 roster bonus kicks in.
Not to mention that RT is looking pretty slim in FA as we speak. It would be like needing a WR in last off seasons FA period.
Our wide receivers have seemed a lot better since Brissett took over as quarterback. The offense line has been rather bad though.
How are guards looking in the upcoming free agency?
Which QB though? We are talking about a very unimpressive QB class at the top compared to the past couple of years and it might be on par or just above the 2022 QB class led by Kenny Pickett.
Sure Mendoza is the "Hot" name for this QB class right now but if you compare him to QBs from other draft classes he's not so hot. This is the wrong year to be moving up for a QB in the top of the 1st round!
Now I might be on board for moving up from the Cardinals 2nd rounder and taking a shot with a late 1st in the 2026 draft. Similar to what the Giants did with Jaxon Dart. Could a John Mateer be there in the late 20s of the first round? I have no problem taking a shot with Mateer as you are not as heavily invested in him as you would be to get one of the "Top QBs" in this class which would involve giving up a lot to move up to the top of the 1st.
DVontel
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2015
- Posts
- 15,543
- Reaction score
- 29,860
Mateer is bad & I’m positive he’ll come out in the 2027 class.
AsUpRoDiGy
Magnanimous
Steer clear of Mateer
Bears are bum slayers and no one will take them seriously until the actually beat a good team. They played a good team once this year--- Detroit --- and lost by a million.
Guess who the play this week, Mason Rudolph and the Steelers. LOLOLOL
The QB is streaky at best and is a clown off the field.
I disagree on Mendoza. Been watching him since last year...dude is a quarterback
Chopper0080
2021 - Prove It
The college playoff will be big for him.
well yeah... but thats true basically for every player every year.
IMO, its really just an indicator of maturity in most cases.
Not so much, "there is no way we draft this guy top 10"...as it is, "No matter where we draft the kid he will need a year to develop before we throw him into the fire"
But if the guy has top 5 talent...he is still a top 5 pick.....but whoever picks him just has to be prepared to develop that talent a bit before using him.
But with Mendoza...he transferred from CAL over to the Hoosiers,...and he got better...whole new system...and he played some really solid teams with Indiana...maybe moreso than he did with CAL.... CAL isnt a member of the 1980's PAC 10 anymore...what I will be looking for in the playoffs is to see how he interacts with his team as the pressure grows....and to see if I can notice him making adjustments at the line as the game progresses...
But it would take a pretty catastrophic outing to say he isnt a top 10 pick
Totally_Red
Air Raid Warning!
Paris Johnson was originally drafted #7 to play RT. If there is a dude in PJJ's area code in next year's draft, I hope the Cardinals draft him even in the top 10 picks.
The Athletic Football Show discussed the best fits for the teams that would currently pick in the top 10.
The hosts both expect both Gannon and Ossenfort to be back, or at least Ossenfort; though they wouldn't be super surprised if that's not the case.
They recognize that the biggest question is what the Cardinals will do at QB, where there won't be a lot of options at #9, where they are currently slotted. Most likely a solution to the QB problem won't be found in this year's draft.
They felt "solid" (!) about the roster overall.
They raised the possibility of drafting an explosive RB, Jeremiah Love, to help whoever the QB is.
But they both agreed that Spencer Fano would be a perfect fit at RT, and that a pick late in the top 10 would be appropriate for taking a RT.
They strongly agreed that the roster is in a MUCH better place than when Ossenfort and Gannon took over. "The bones of a good team are here. They're 11th in Defensive DVOA. They've got talent on both sides of the ball. You'd like to see Marvin Harrison pick it up a bit. The receiver corps could be deeper." They raved about Walter Nolen. There are reasons for optimism that's muddied up by the QB situation.
The hosts both expect both Gannon and Ossenfort to be back, or at least Ossenfort; though they wouldn't be super surprised if that's not the case.
They recognize that the biggest question is what the Cardinals will do at QB, where there won't be a lot of options at #9, where they are currently slotted. Most likely a solution to the QB problem won't be found in this year's draft.
They felt "solid" (!) about the roster overall.
They raised the possibility of drafting an explosive RB, Jeremiah Love, to help whoever the QB is.
But they both agreed that Spencer Fano would be a perfect fit at RT, and that a pick late in the top 10 would be appropriate for taking a RT.
They strongly agreed that the roster is in a MUCH better place than when Ossenfort and Gannon took over. "The bones of a good team are here. They're 11th in Defensive DVOA. They've got talent on both sides of the ball. You'd like to see Marvin Harrison pick it up a bit. The receiver corps could be deeper." They raved about Walter Nolen. There are reasons for optimism that's muddied up by the QB situation.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Chopper0080
2021 - Prove It
The Indiana offense is not very complex so you really need to see him make as many big throws vs top competition as you can. As many crunch time drives as possible.
Cardiac
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2002
- Posts
- 12,445
- Reaction score
- 4,146
I believe the long term plan was always to move PJ to LT.
i agree with all this - especially rt
