Cards need receivers in draft by Somers

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,025
Reaction score
485
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Kent Somers
The Arizona Republic
Apr. 24, 2003 12:00 AM



Top 5 receivers

1. Charles Rogers, Michigan State, 6 feet 2 ½, 202: Tall and skinny, he has the athletic gifts to score from anywhere.

2. Andre Johnson, Miami, 6-2, 230: Amazingly fast for his size but drops more passes than he should.

3. Taylor Jacobs, Florida, 6-0, 205: Not in the class of Rogers or Johnson, but he's productive.

4. Kelley Washington, Tennessee, 6-2 ½, 223: Great tools but has a reputation for being difficult for coaches to handle.

5. Bryant Johnson, Penn State, 6-2 ½, 214: Not much of a deep threat but should be a solid No. 2.

Sleeper Kevin Curtis, Utah State, 5-11, 186: Intelligence and toughness compensate for his lack of size.

Cardinals needs Desperate is the best description. The top three receivers from last season have departed via free agency, and there are no proven replacements. The Cardinals need to draft two receivers who can contribute as rookies.



The Cardinals would like nothing better than to install a passing attack as bold and unpredictable as the one employed by the St. Louis Rams.

Unfortunately, they're stuck with talent that's more suited to running the veer. At least for now.

The top three receivers from last year - David Boston, Frank Sanders and MarTay Jenkins - have departed through free agency. The remaining five players have a combined 66 receptions in their careers.

So unless they convince quarterback Jeff Blake to run the option, the Cardinals need receivers in this weekend's draft.

"What we would like to do is come out of the draft with at least a couple of receivers and the pass-rush situation addressed," said Rod Graves, the team's vice president of football operations.

The Cardinals probably won't take a receiver in the first round, unless they trade down from the sixth overall pick. The top two receivers, Michigan State's Charles Rogers and Miami's Andre Johnson, could be among the first five players selected.

Most NFL talent evaluators agree there is a significant drop in talent after that.

"I think the last two years were deeper than this year," Houston general manager Charley Casserly said of this year's receiver crop. "But I think Charlie Rogers clearly is a guy you're going to talk about, you're going to read about. He has enormous potential. We've been scouting him for two years now, and the guy is going to be a superstar in the league."

Detroit is expected to take Rogers with the second pick, leaving Houston, with the third selection, to take Johnson.

He could be quite a consolation prize. Johnson is 6 feet 2, 230 pounds and can make defensive backs look like they are playing on a field of pudding.

The Cardinals are expected to address their need at receiver as early as the second round, when players such as Penn State's Bryant Johnson or Tennessee's Kelley Washington will probably be available.

Last week, the Cardinals brought Texas A&M receiver Bethel Johnson in for a visit.

Ideally, offensive coordinator Jerry Sullivan would like to have a stable of five solid receivers who are fast and versatile enough for the unpredictable offense he envisions. It's a plan modeled on the schemes Pittsburgh and St. Louis have been so successful with the past few years.

"If you have one or two wide receivers as opposed to three or four, it does limit what you can do in terms of being a problem for the defense," St. Louis coach Mike Martz said.

"I think defenses have always been ahead of the offense in this league. That's my opinion. I think to keep up with defenses, you've got to try to take away the rhythm of the game from the defense.

"I think that's what you do when you change your personnel groups, put multiple receivers in and out. When you sit with a two-wide receiver group throughout the game, a defense can really try and take control of the tempo of a game."
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
The remaining five players have a combined 66 receptions in their careers.

And if we draft more, their combined receptions will STILL be 66.

I don't understand the logic of drafting a WR high this year. Admittedly by the "experts" its a weaker year for WR than usual, and we already have a bunch of young guys with potential on the team. We need to add vets, not more rooks.

I sure hope they stay away from receiver until at least the third.


ohboyohboyohboyohboyohboyohboy...it's getting close!
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
The top three receivers from last season have departed via free agency, and there are no proven replacements.... - Kent Somers
I don't accept that premise. I'll concede that we don't have an adequate replacement for David Boston, but I feel McAddley and Gilmore (with an extra regular and offseason under their belts) are pretty close to Mar Tay and Frankie (some might say better). And I don't consider Kevin Kasper to be chopped liver either.

We don't need three "replacement" wideouts. We need one guy similar in style to David Boston (Robinson or a 2nd or 3rd round pick) and possibly a #5 wideout (late-rounder) who can return kicks.

This would leave us with Poole and Soliday (who aren't totally terrible) as #6 and #7 wideouts, providing depth and pushing the other guys.
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,855
Reaction score
54,630
Location
Las Vegas
Originally posted by JeffGollin
The top three receivers from last season have departed via free agency, and there are no proven replacements.... - Kent Somers
I don't accept that premise. I'll concede that we don't have an adequate replacement for David Boston, but I feel McAddley and Gilmore (with an extra regular and offseason under their belts) are pretty close to Mar Tay and Frankie (some might say better). And I don't consider Kevin Kasper to be chopped liver either.

We don't need three "replacement" wideouts. We need one guy similar in style to David Boston (Robinson or a 2nd or 3rd round pick) and possibly a #5 wideout (late-rounder) who can return kicks.

This would leave us with Poole and Soliday (who aren't totally terrible) as #6 and #7 wideouts, providing depth and pushing the other guys.

Agreed!
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,402,957
Posts
6,632,212
Members
6,435
Latest member
taylor_fancav
Top