Cardinals at Rams game thread 1-4-25

AZJ

All Star
Joined
Feb 12, 2024
Posts
610
Reaction score
860
Location
Phoenix
I thought tie went to the offense?

It does. Not sure how they can definitively say that was picked off when both guys had the ball and Witherspoon ripped it away after they both landed.

But, as I have observed lately, we are neither good enough or have a big enough "name" to get those calls.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
104,396
Reaction score
57,247
The throw was fine. Michael Wilson made no effort to trap the ball. That’s 100% on him

He was way behind the DB and had to stop because of the throw. I still dont' get how that's an INT he caught the ball they went to the ground dual possession goes to the offense. He was on the ground with the defender on him so he's down by contact?
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
42,286
Reaction score
33,690
It does. Not sure how they can definitively say that was picked off when both guys had the ball and Witherspoon ripped it away after they both landed.

But, as I have observed lately, we are neither good enough or have a big enough "name" to get those calls.
Yep.

If that was Nacua it would be a catch. If it was called a catch by Wilson they would have overruled it.
 

pemory09

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Posts
3,645
Reaction score
4,958
It does. Not sure how they can definitively say that was picked off when both guys had the ball and Witherspoon ripped it away after they both landed.

But, as I have observed lately, we are neither good enough or have a big enough "name" to get those calls.
Honestly, we’re such trash that the refs. assume we always screw up.
 

TJ

Knower of Ball
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
39,137
Reaction score
27,584
Location
South Bay
At least my Rams have a 2
Possession lead with the ball to start the 2nd half
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,422,204
Posts
6,654,141
Members
6,435
Latest member
taylor_fancav
Top