I don't thin those still pictures are conclusive of anything, Shane--we need to see the replay to draw any decisive conclusions, and even then, we've all come to different outcomes.
I think that if even cardinals fans on the message board disagree, then it's pretty clear there would have been inconclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field.
The pics are fuzzy which is to be expected. However the Ref would have advantage of full HD replays from multiple angles. No doubt in my that it would have been overturned. Its pretty conclusive on the slow mo replay IMO.
Im sure at a bar and live you just arent getting the same looks.
Im not knocking Whiz and understand that he doesnt have a lot of time to make that decision. But the guys in the booth above should have been all over it.

