15 thoughts - free agency

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
1 – Keep Brissett. Top five backup QB on a reasonable contract, who will not embarrass you if he needs to start some games, and is an ideal partner for whoever is the primary starter. He is worth much more than a late-round pick, if that is all you can get.

2 – For several years it was shocking to me that many fans still thought that the salary cap has any importance at all. Now I just smile at it.

3 – The biggest issue with guesses and wishes like this is that we don’t know the schemes, so it is very difficult to know which type of players they are seeking. I mean, the offensive schemes will probably have shades of the Rams’ and Niners’, but likely there will be adjustments. And Rallis might run some of the same as the last couple of seasons, but I doubt he will copy Gannon 1:1.

4 – I guess it is some form of PTSD from many years ago, but it is very strange how many fans still point to Bidwill being cheap. He is obviously not (proven last time by the guaranteed money in signings of Josh Sweat and Dalvin Tomlinson), but it’s just that his organization is not really attractive to many players.

5 – Jermaine Eluemunor or Braden Smith at right tackle and David Edwards or Ed Ingram at guard should certainly be targets.

6 – I think that LaFleur wants Jimmy Garoppolo. If so, I certainly hope that he gets him, even though he is not my preferred option.

7 – I hope they gamble with the QB-spot, and I hope they do it by signing Malik Willis. I hope they sign him to a contract similar to Sam Darnold’s (multiple years, but almost all guarantees up-front to essentially make it a one-year deal). I could not care any less about how much salary he gets – see thought #2 – as long as the structure of the contract doesn’t prevent them from reacting to it after the season.

It is – at best – a lack of historical knowledge to be convinced that the QB market next year will be better than this, so I would much rather give it a real shot than give up on the season in March and risk being in the exact same position in a year from now. Signing Willis would be full-blown boom-or-bust, but if it booms, the Cardinals are suddenly very relevant in the division again. And if it fails, well, then things will pretty much be like they are now, so there is not much to lose.

Further, LaFleur has the best possible intel (and as much as he wants) from his brother and Hackett, who worked with Willis last year, as well as from Ossenfort, who drafted Willis. There is nobody in the entire NFL that is better equipped to decide if Willis is worth taking a chance on. And because of that it is unfathomable to me that some fans want to handcuff LaFleur from the beginning by hoping that they don’t sign Willis. If LaFleur wants him, everyone should hope that he gets him. I don’t understand why people wish that the Cards hired LaFleur to fix the offense and then tell him how to do it.

8 – I thought they would have bought Greg Newsome at the trade deadline, but maybe Jacksonville just gave a better offer. Well, now he is a free agent and the Cardinals’ CB situation has not improved.

9 – Re-sign Gillikin, Brewer, Ryland, Hernandez, Collier, Carter, and Starling Thomas. If Calais Campbell wants to play, he should decide his own contract, Fitz-style.

10 – Just like Malik Willis has an obvious connection to LaFleur through his brother and Hackett, so does Packers-starters OT Rasheed Walker and OG Sean Rhyan. None of them are amazing players, but talent-wise they are still in an entirely different stratosphere than Evan Brown and Jonah Williams.

11 – Philosophically I am against spending big at RB. However, since the quarterback quality will be a question mark, an effective running game is paramount. Travis Etienne, Kenneth Gainwell and Rachaad White are very different players, but all would be a good fit in different roles with McVay, so I am guessing they would also be fine with LaFleur.

12 – Cuts are obviously very difficult to project, but I have found three relevant, based on team insiders’ reports and educated guesses. Both S Minkah Fitzpatrick (Miami) and MLB Tremaine Edmunds (Chicago) have been granted permission to seek a trade, which usually means that they will get released if no buyer is found. OG Elgton Jenkins (Green Bay) was injured most of last season but has been a very good and stable starter for years. All three would be clear upgrades over Jalen Thompson, Davis-Gaither and Evan Brown.

13 – I was on record at the trade deadline that I wanted them to trade for Rashid Shaheed. I would be surprised if Seahawks let him go, but if they do, the Cards should be in on him.

14 – You have to think that Leo Chenal will be a target considering that they just hired Kansas City’s linebacker coach, as well as how badly Davis-Gaither sucked last season.

15 – Alijah Vera-Tucker is the most talented offensive guard on the market, but the problem is that he is never on the field. He would be the definition of a boom-or-bust signing. LaFleur was in New York when they drafted Vera-Tucker.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,059
Reaction score
42,370
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I guess it is some form of PTSD from many years ago, but it is very strange how many fans still point to Bidwill being cheap. He is obviously not (proven last time by the guaranteed money in signings of Josh Sweat and Dalvin Tomlinson), but it’s just that his organization is not really attractive to many players.
I’m more convinced by the fact that Michael is paying Kyler Murray $36 million not to play football this season. I’m convinced we waited to get the Passtronaut because Michael had to be convinced that Colt McCoy was so washed he had to eat like $3 million to cut him.

That’s why I accuse Michael of being a rube and dunce, not cheap.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
20,992
Reaction score
22,847
I’m more convinced by the fact that Michael is paying Kyler Murray $36 million not to play football this season. I’m convinced we waited to get the Passtronaut because Michael had to be convinced that Colt McCoy was so washed he had to eat like $3 million to cut him.

That’s why I accuse Michael of being a rube and dunce, not cheap.
These things aren't mutually exclusive - there are more than enough data points to show that he's cheap as well.
 

NWMike

Veteran
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Posts
179
Reaction score
478
Location
Seattle, WA
2 – For several years it was shocking to me that many fans still thought that the salary cap has any importance at all. Now I just smile at it.

It’s only important for cash poor teams like the Cardinals. The issue isn’t the salary cap per se but the fact that Bidwill doesn’t have the cash flow for large amounts of upfront money because his only source of income is his football club. The Cardinals are definitely a tier 2 org financially.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,445
Reaction score
4,146
Always enjoy these write-ups G, also will always disagree with point 2. No importance at all, now I'm smiling. We are seeing quality players being cut and traded because of salary cap implications and impacts. I do know that there are many ways to manipulate the monies to fit players under the cap. Key point being fit players under the cap.

Bidwills vary from scrooge to frugal. Bill being scrooge and Mikey being not as cheap. Of course he's paying a couple of coaching staffs, he's to cheap to pay for the best available ones so he rolls the dice on finding a diamond in the rough. This makes him stupid and cheap. Sure he makes some semi splash FA signings in an attempt to sell tickets. Same reason he is paying for 2? HC's, ticket sales would be almost nothing if he didn't fire JG.

Agree with a lot of your post but these 2 are big misses imo.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Always enjoy these write-ups G, also will always disagree with point 2. No importance at all, now I'm smiling. We are seeing quality players being cut and traded because of salary cap implications and impacts. I do know that there are many ways to manipulate the monies to fit players under the cap. Key point being fit players under the cap.

Bidwills vary from scrooge to frugal. Bill being scrooge and Mikey being not as cheap. Of course he's paying a couple of coaching staffs, he's to cheap to pay for the best available ones so he rolls the dice on finding a diamond in the rough. This makes him stupid and cheap. Sure he makes some semi splash FA signings in an attempt to sell tickets. Same reason he is paying for 2? HC's, ticket sales would be almost nothing if he didn't fire JG.

Agree with a lot of your post but these 2 are big misses imo.
The difference with us and real football teams is the real teams don’t care about the salary cap until the beginning of the new year. That’s when they have to get under the cap which means they have tough decisions and have to cut valuable players.
Then comes the start of the new year and boom they are “50m” over..

Back to Ghandi’s post ( great as usual). Sign a guard and a right tackle.
Sign Willis ( yes a big leap)
Draft Love.
If nothing else we would have an rxciting and competitive offense.
 

Outerlimits

Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2019
Posts
460
Reaction score
1,045
Location
Richmond Virginia
I do think Michael wants to have a successful team but he is basically terrible at accomplishing that goal.

His father didn't care and was totally fine with going 4-12 every year.

Neither situation is good but at least with Michael there is an outside chance the team stumbles into successful seasons(but not sustained) on rare occasions.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
22,542
Reaction score
10,691
2 – For several years it was shocking to me that many fans still thought that the salary cap has any importance at all. Now I just smile at it.

It’s only important for cash poor teams like the Cardinals. The issue isn’t the salary cap per se but the fact that Bidwill doesn’t have the cash flow for large amounts of upfront money because his only source of income is his football club. The Cardinals are definitely a tier 2 org financially.
disagree.
Bidwill might not have the cash flow of some other teams, but he has plenty of cashflow to run an NFL franchise at a high level. Every NFL owner has that ability. Mike Brown is often lumped in with Bidwill for being cash poor. He's signed Burrow, Chase, and Higgins to huge contracts the last few years. Plus, they could've tagged Hendrickson this year but decided to let him walk. Money or cap space is not an issue.
 

Sandan

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
27,064
Reaction score
3,936
Location
UK
I do think Michael wants to have a successful team but he is basically terrible at accomplishing that goal.

His father didn't care and was totally fine with going 4-12 every year.

Neither situation is good but at least with Michael there is an outside chance the team stumbles into successful seasons(but not sustained) on rare occasions.
Did you ever meet his father ? I did and in a non public venue, i.e. not a stage managed event.

While I can't speak to his earlier years, when I ran into him at the training facility he came across a just a pleasant, calm, friendly grandfather who deferred to the Cardinals staff.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,777
Reaction score
5,930
Location
Fort Myers
I always felt the Cardinals spent money but spent it foolishly and on the wrong players more often than not. I saw a graphic recently and the Cardinals I think were number 7 in off-season spending last year, I think of the 10 highest spenders only 3 made the playoffs.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
10,039
Reaction score
6,716
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Ghandi, thanks and I have a question. Just saw that the Cardinals cut Demercado. Should this move give me hope that we'll draft Love?
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
13,504
Reaction score
6,620
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Monti is the problem. He has done terrible with his free agent signings. With the exception of Josh Sweat his signings have been a disaster. Keim was much better and that is a fact.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
It’s only important for cash poor teams like the Cardinals. The issue isn’t the salary cap per se but the fact that Bidwill doesn’t have the cash flow for large amounts of upfront money because his only source of income is his football club. The Cardinals are definitely a tier 2 org financially.
That is exactly right. Actually, when a contract is signed, the guaranteed money needs to be immediately deposited into an escrow account to ensure that the player gets his money. It is an ancient way of doing it, but for some reason the rule is still in place many, many years after it was introduced.

The point is that less cash-rich owners can be restricted by this rule since it is not necessarily that easy to get a fortune released to make a huge up-front cash deposit. It’s not all owners that are super liquid. I am pretty sure it has the effect that Bidwill releases a strict budget for at least the first couple of free agency waves, simply because he must since he doesn’t have time to suddenly pivot to get more liquids.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
Always enjoy these write-ups G, also will always disagree with point 2. No importance at all, now I'm smiling. We are seeing quality players being cut and traded because of salary cap implications and impacts. I do know that there are many ways to manipulate the monies to fit players under the cap. Key point being fit players under the cap.
I think there are two different elements in that, Cardiac.

Sure, there are players that are being released for salary cap purposes, but that is partly because teams will get punished for being over the cap at the start of a league year. The salary cap might not be a problem, but you also cannot ignore it. And I am also willing to bet that those casualties could be avoided if the team and player truly wanted to.

The other element is exactly as you mention – that teams can manipulate the cap to fit people on the limit. That is why it always make me smile when people say things like “they cannot afford X player because they only have Y amount of salary cap money” or things like that.

Sure he makes some semi splash FA signings in an attempt to sell tickets.
Semi splash? Josh Sweat’s guaranteed money was among the absolute top among non-QB free agents. Tomlinson’s was in the upper half. Those are not cheap semi splashes.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
Back to Ghandi’s post ( great as usual). Sign a guard and a right tackle.
Sign Willis ( yes a big leap)
Draft Love.
This obviously is a little beside the free agency-topic, but I would much rather pay a runningback in free agency than draft Love. Sure, he might be better, but he will immediately be one of the highest paid running backs and would keep them from drafting a stud at a more important position.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
We're always sitting on cap space and never get creative to spend more. I wonder why that would be?
As I mentioned in the original post, the salary cap is not a measuring stick for anything. Cash is king, also in the NFL. "Sitting on cap space" doesn't tell us anything.

In fact, there is a rule in the CBA that says that each team is required to spend 90% of the salary cap between 2024 through 2026 in cash. Specifically for the Cardinals, they need to spend close to 200 million this year to meet that obligation, and that is not a problem at all as last year they spent more than 277 million. Oh, and you know who spent less last year? The Seahawks and the Rams.

Overall, the Cardinals are in the middle of the league in cash spendings.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
Ghandi, thanks and I have a question. Just saw that the Cardinals cut Demercado. Should this move give me hope that we'll draft Love?
I doubt it, Garth. Demercado was a role player and is easily replaceable. I would much rather pay a couple of running backs in free agency, or potentially draft one or two in later rounds.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,968
Reaction score
24,687
Location
Modesto, California
This obviously is a little beside the free agency-topic, but I would much rather pay a runningback in free agency than draft Love. Sure, he might be better, but he will immediately be one of the highest paid running backs and would keep them from drafting a stud at a more important position.
name said stud...
the only reason I am willing to jump on the Love train at 3 is because there isnt really a no brainer stud available with greater value.
Bailey perhaps... but none of the OT's are worth a top 7 pick...Reese and Bain have severe issues...and safety sits right there with RB in positional value so its a pick your poison situation...and considering we just hired an offensive coach, our best RB is 31 and coming off injury, and we have invested 47 draft picks into the secondary the past three years...IMO, this all adds up to Love being the right pick at the right time for the RedBirds.

either pick Love, or trade back to the early teens where all those other guys become viable options.... but then we are actively avoiding drafting an impact player...and we need impact players.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
20,992
Reaction score
22,847
Please share
Is this some sort of bit? Have you been a participating board member for 10+ years? Where do you want to start? How they treat season ticket holders? @Weenus O'Baggins has plenty of stories of how cheap they are and how poorly they are treated, and has shared them throughout the years.

You want to ask the players? We're talking about an organization that consistently comes up short all around, and yes, most of it can be attributed to being cheap! You don't have primitive facilities because you prefer that esthetic!

You think it's coincidence that they're always bringing in head coaches and assistants without experience because the FO thinks they're the best possible candidates?

It's so odd to me that people want to parse how he's bad yet say he's not tight with money - You're seriously going to argue that compared to his peers he's not cheap?
 
Top