Khalil Mack on the block?

Arz101

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Posts
4,906
Reaction score
5,595
Feel better now? Your second post did say Donald was a good or better than Mack, which wasn't apparent by your first post (at least not to me). Peace.

There is no peace unless the argument is won, right?
 

LoyalRam

All Star
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
556
Reaction score
488
Location
Kansas
There is no peace unless the argument is won, right?
this is sports chat
There is no peace unless the argument is won, right?
Naw, there's only peace if you keep your opinion to yourself on an opposing fans place. I forgot myself when I thought I could express an opinion here as a Rams fan. No big thing.
 

Dback Jon

Killer Snail
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
76,422
Reaction score
33,347
Location
Scottsdale
this is sports chat

Naw, there's only peace if you keep your opinion to yourself on an opposing fans place. I forgot myself when I thought I could express an opinion here as a Rams fan. No big thing.


You are welcome as long as you are respectful that this is a Cards site
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,545
Reaction score
61,244
Hamster it up all you want buddy. What I wrote makes perfect sense, sorry you cannot wrap your head around it.

Funny thing is you are so up in your own butt, you do not realize that I am saying Donald is in the same category and is better than Mack. If you are going to be defensive about everything stated, then go back to your team's board.

uh... count me as one who read you saying "most means every single player in the league" as Mack's better than every single player in the league.

arguing otherwise makes very little sense Rug.
 

LoyalRam

All Star
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
556
Reaction score
488
Location
Kansas
You are welcome as long as you are respectful that this is a Cards site
What exactly does that mean, really? Constrain your thoughts/insights within certain parameters? I could say something stupid as a Cards fan that would be overlooked by all here, but would not be overlooked as a Rams fan. Not complaining, because it's that way at other forums as well. It is, what it is.
 

Matt L

formerly known as mattyboy
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
4,374
Reaction score
580
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
What exactly does that mean, really? Constrain your thoughts/insights within certain parameters? I could say something stupid as a Cards fan that would be overlooked by all here, but would not be overlooked as a Rams fan. Not complaining, because it's that way at other forums as well. It is, what it is.

This is a pretty tough board, if you say something overly optimistic for the Cardinals, there are a couple posters who are going to let you know you've been drinking too much Cardinal Koolaid.
 

Dback Jon

Killer Snail
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
76,422
Reaction score
33,347
Location
Scottsdale
What exactly does that mean, really? Constrain your thoughts/insights within certain parameters? I could say something stupid as a Cards fan that would be overlooked by all here, but would not be overlooked as a Rams fan. Not complaining, because it's that way at other forums as well. It is, what it is.


No, thoughtful discussion, bragging if you win, ok. Trolling with comments like "Cardinals Suck" would not be welcome.
 

LoyalRam

All Star
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
556
Reaction score
488
Location
Kansas
This is a pretty tough board, if you say something overly optimistic for the Cardinals, there are a couple posters who are going to let you know you've been drinking too much Cardinal Koolaid.
All I gotta say, is WHAT'S WRONG WITH KOOL AID!?
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
26,760
Reaction score
35,132
Location
Colorado
I love Aaron Donald, and was a believer since he was at Pitt. That being said, edge rushers are still more valuable than interior rushers, even if the gap is much smaller than it used to be. It is based on how difficult it is to get extra help on that player. Edge players are more difficult to double than interior players, and to do so, you have to use a player with weaker blocking skills. Due to that, while Donald may be the best interior defensive lineman in football, I can't say he is "better" than Chandler Jones, Khalil Mack and/or Von Miller as their positions are technically more valuable.
 

LoyalRam

All Star
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
556
Reaction score
488
Location
Kansas
I love Aaron Donald, and was a believer since he was at Pitt. That being said, edge rushers are still more valuable than interior rushers, even if the gap is much smaller than it used to be. It is based on how difficult it is to get extra help on that player. Edge players are more difficult to double than interior players, and to do so, you have to use a player with weaker blocking skills. Due to that, while Donald may be the best interior defensive lineman in football, I can't say he is "better" than Chandler Jones, Khalil Mack and/or Von Miller as their positions are technically more valuable.
Or...Great Interior Defenders make it easier for Edge Rushers to get sacks when QB's are flushed out of the pocket? As for value, we have a poster at ROD who operates a fishing boat out of Florida, and he took HOF player Warren Sapp on a trip. Sapp thinks that Donald is better than he was as a 3 technique DT, which is as about a high level of praise as I can think. But, differing views each have their merits...
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,916
Reaction score
26,675
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I love Aaron Donald, and was a believer since he was at Pitt. That being said, edge rushers are still more valuable than interior rushers, even if the gap is much smaller than it used to be. It is based on how difficult it is to get extra help on that player. Edge players are more difficult to double than interior players, and to do so, you have to use a player with weaker blocking skills. Due to that, while Donald may be the best interior defensive lineman in football, I can't say he is "better" than Chandler Jones, Khalil Mack and/or Von Miller as their positions are technically more valuable.

It's interesting. I think that interior rushers are actually MORE valuable, because they make everyone around them better. There are fewer impact interior rushers than there are edge rushers. I think a FOOTBAW GUY would tell you that he'd rather have an elite DT than an elite edge rusher. They just are harder to build a defense around somehow — I think it's because they have to give high effort on every down.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
24,930
Reaction score
13,629
I would trade Patrick P for him. And probably a pick to go along with him.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,777
Reaction score
11,046
agreed. I'd much rather give up a 1st/2nd for Mack and spend buku dollars there than give Golden a big contract.

Mack/CJ on opposite sides of the defense would make them ferocious.

+1 but I would personally pay to have all 3 of them on the team with the cap space we have coming to us.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,336
Reaction score
1,862
Location
ASFN
This is never going to happen. But if you could pair Mack with Jones. I think we’re knocking on the Super Bowl door every year.
 

Rams1Fan

Rookie
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Posts
60
Reaction score
48
Location
US
If Mack gets traded my guess is the Jets get him. They need the splash and will spend stupid money. They made the biggest offer to Suh and he's 30.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,461
Reaction score
16,602
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Whatever the case, the Cards Front Office and the Raiders have been frequent trade partners in a lot of aspects but we do not have what it would take (or rather willing and I sure the hell would not trade Peterson while he can still run) to do any deal but I would not be shocked if the Niners where part of a scenario
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
537,130
Posts
5,264,418
Members
6,275
Latest member
Beagleperson
Top