Jacob DeGrom

outcent13

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Posts
1,355
Reaction score
1,967
With Machado off the market could the Dbacks counter with a much bolder move like trading for a controllable ace like DeGrom?

What would it take to get a deal for him done? Do we even have enough to make that happen?

Something like (based on meds percieved needs) Marte, Duplantier, Cron, Clarke, and Chafin? Maybe add a long term guy like Perdomo?

They would get 5 guys they could plug into their Major league roster as early as next season.

We would get an ace to pair with grienke and hopefully Ray picks it up. Just a thought and to be clear I know very little about what they would want or if the prospects are acceptable ... Just bored mostly!
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
19,777
Reaction score
10,632
It would cost a ton, probably more than Machado, he's a 30 million dollar per year arm and whoever has him will save 20 mil a year on that the next 2 seasons.

But I think he'd be worth it if we have the prospects to get a deal done. A few hot pitchers can be enough to win the WS if you can manage to make the playoffs.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,534
Reaction score
16,833
Location
The Giant Toaster
It would take what it reportedly would’ve taken to get Jose Fernandez a couple years back. Major and minor league talent... deGrom has two and half years of service left.
 

DWKB

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
18,224
Reaction score
7,490
Location
Annapolis, MD
If deGrom was on the market, we would not be the top bidder. That's the reality.
 

Ronin

…..
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
135,218
Reaction score
54,930
Location
Las Cruces, New Mexico
MLB trade rumors roundup: Mets unlikely to deal aces, Phillies eye relievers, Indians nab Hand
There's been talk, as most of us know by now, of the Mets possibly trading star starting pitchers Jacob deGrom and/or Noah Syndergaard. The price tag on either always figured to be very high, but now some reports are surfacing that moving either right now is unlikely. James Wagner of the New York Times has a Twitter thread on the matter.

Basically, the Mets want upper-level minor-league elite prospects and/or major-league players and there don't seem to be many great matches.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/...aces-phillies-eye-relievers-indians-nab-hand/
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
35,498
Reaction score
6,932
Location
Scottsdale

Dback Jon

Killer Snail
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
76,751
Reaction score
33,929
Location
Scottsdale
I can't believe I'm gonna say this, but, the Mets are being smart to hold onto deGrom and Thor... Unless they were being offered the next guaranteed Trout, or the next guaranteed deGrom/Scherzer/Severino, which they're not, there is no point in unloading these guys for considerably less talent and less value.


Yup - and two years more control is a long time. Heck, the Mets could sign Machado and a couple others and be a contenda quickly with those two leading the rotation
 
Top