Would You Trade Dansby for Suggs?

[Mitch]

Straight up. Would you do it?

We need a pass rush, IMO, to win the Super Bowl. I don't like having to rely at this point on Okeafor, LaBoy and a rookie or two in order to get that done. Suggs coming home, IMO, would electrify and already electirc U of P atmosphere. We would have to acquire a 34WILB...by FA or the draft...but I think we could get a good one...I also think that Adrian Wilson would be "da bomb" there in the hybrids of hybrids, if needed.

Let's bring Suggs home. C'mon Cardinals, get this done!

 

[TheCardFan]

100% no.

If Dansby was used correctly (IMO)...he could be a Demarcus Ware type player (12-15 sacks/yr).

 

[Skkorpion]

Yes. In a heartbeat.

 

[joeshmo]

Dansby isnt even in the same stratosphere as Ware, physically, talent, skill or atheltically.

To answer the question, the ink would be dry before the deal was even done being faxed to us.

 

[CardLogic]

No, I wouldn't do the deal. Suggs has become a very good player, but he doesn't have the versatility of Dansby. Also Dansby has become the leader of the Cardinal's D. You simply don't trade away your leadership!

 

[SeaChicken]

Dansby = Very good player.

Suggs = Extremely good player.

 

[jaguarpaw81]

No doubt, Dansby isn't close to being at Suggs' level. They are both top 5 players at their positions IMO, but a pass rusher always takes precedent over a ILB.

 

[SuperSpck]

What everyone else said. You can hide behind lesser talent at ILB more then you can OLB.

 

[PJ1]

I would but the Ravens would not.

 

[sundevilscott]

Yes. In a heartbeat.

Ditto that...

 

[the_future23]

Suggs is a lot better than Dansby. Yes, I would.

 

[Zeno]

I jst don't think the Ravens would feel like they are getting equal value in that trade. I'd do it, Suggs is a pass rushing terror.

 

[Jetstream Green]

Hell NO!!! Dansby has not been used in a way to fully use all he has to offer, and even without a bunch of sacks...he was doing a lot to hold this defense together last season...and when i think of our leaders on defense...I think Wilson, Dansby and Berry (yes Berry, and I hope we have him this season) and Hayes quietly and surely being a leader

 

[DevonCardsFan]

This has zero chance of happening, so Why even waste brain power on it

 

[jstadvl]

Not a chance. The schemes are different, we don't do alot of roaming(Ravens did). Dansby WANTS to be here, I've yet to see his MUG on the so called sheet, there's no angst. Mr. B, is class, period, and Michael has had to play by adherence to things (values) opposed to just WIN AT ANY COST,. Dansby is an up-side kid of guy, with a smell for winning by just playing the game I wouldn't even entertain, the idea. A seed, some water and a tad of manure and this will be a forest in no time. I should have just left this at "not a chance". lol

 

[Stout]

Um, hello? McFly? YES! lol

 

[BACH]

What everyone else said. You can hide behind lesser talent at ILB more then you can OLB.

Bingo!

That the main point IMO. All talk about if Suggs is the same, slightly better or a lot better than Dansby is irrelevant. A OLB is a lot harder to replace than ILB, so Suggs has much more trade value than Dansby.

 

[Vermont Maverick]

Yep.But if the trade fell through, would he go all "Cutler" on us?