Who’s our next qb?

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
34,414
Reaction score
34,800
Location
PDX
He's expected to be ready for training camp. Achilles isn't as long as ACL.

An Achilles rupture is absolutely longer than a ACL. Also, there is no way to say he will be ready by training camp this early and for sure won't feel comfortable running at first. The only one longer is a patellar tendon rupture.

Recovery Time
The recovery time for an Achilles rupture is typically longer than that for an ACL tear. While both injuries require extensive rehabilitation, the Achilles tendon is a more complex structure, and the recovery process can take longer. The exact recovery time depends on the extent of the injury and whether surgery is needed.

NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports Jones will face a 9-to-12-month recovery from the injury. The shorter end of that timeline would give the Duke product a chance to return in early September ahead of the 2026 season; a longer recovery would potentially sideline him for most of the campaign.

 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
29,913
Reaction score
41,319
Location
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
An Achilles rupture is absolutely longer than a ACL. Also, there is no way to say he will be ready by training camp this early and for sure won't feel comfortable running at first. The only one longer is a patellar tendon rupture.






You must be registered for see images attach
 
OP
OP
slanidrac16

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I hope I'm wrong, but I've got this feeling that the Cards are gonna pull a shocker and pick Ty Simpson at #3. If we start hearing how much LaFleur likes the kid and people start talking about him going in the first half of round one...look out.
They won’t have to. They could ( and will) trade down for a bunch of picks. Probably trade down as far as 20. One of them could be for Simpson and the other for a number of positions.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
15,128
I hope I'm wrong, but I've got this feeling that the Cards are gonna pull a shocker and pick Ty Simpson at #3. If we start hearing how much LaFleur likes the kid and people start talking about him going in the first half of round one...look out.

I can see it now.

We trade back, take Simpson 10th, we win 3 games, Simpson is putrid, we're ready to move on, trade him for a 4th round pick. We look to draft Arch Manning #1 and he refuses to play here.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
79,639
Reaction score
35,181
Location
Killjoy Central
I can see it now.

We trade back, take Simpson 10th, we win 3 games, Simpson is putrid, we're ready to move on, trade him for a 4th round pick. We look to draft Arch Manning #1 and he refuses to play here.
We wouldn't have gotten Eli to play here.
We couldn't get Peyton to play here.
We shouldn't even consider Arch.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,607
Reaction score
38,582
Location
Orlando, FL
I hope I'm wrong, but I've got this feeling that the Cards are gonna pull a shocker and pick Ty Simpson at #3. If we start hearing how much LaFleur likes the kid and people start talking about him going in the first half of round one...look out.
If they do there won’t be any further talk about it from them. I expect they’d try to trade down and try to get him. They couldn’t tip their hand in case someone else wanted him.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,471
Reaction score
848
If they do there won’t be any further talk about it from them. I expect they’d try to trade down and try to get him. They couldn’t tip their hand in case someone else wanted him.
Would Dallas give us 12 and 20? They may want Reece as a parsons replacement…and Jerry loves a splash…we get Simpson at 12 before jets….then offensive tackle and d line at 34
 

Gandhi

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,814
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Denmark
Kind of strange how many fans think they can just decide to trade down, no matter what other teams want. We all know how it works, and I am not sure there is anyone that others want to trade up for. Maybe Reese.

Since the thread is about quarterbacks, I would not be shocked if Cardinals and Vikings made sort of a non-trade trade where Murray goes there and McCarthy comes to the Cards. He was awful last season, but it’s not like he is broken beyond repair, and his style of playing is a good fit in LaFleur’s (presumed) offense. Would be sort of an attempt of redemption.

It’s just that they are handling the QB situation very weird. That is likely just because of incompetence, but I do wonder if there is something else coming. Most likely that feeling is because I want it to be that way, though.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,694
Reaction score
48,826
Location
UK
I think people are being completely unrealistic about how Brissett performed last year, based on results when he was playing with half his receiving corps, an O-line that contained second and third stringers most of the time and no running back room, plus a defense that was heavily injured and went completely downhill after week ten.

Aah, so I pulled quarterback stats for the last ten seasons to compare. This first table is purely based on passer rating. As passer rating is already a composite stat based on various other statistics, it's a fair, or at least the most reasonably accurate indicator we have of performance that's levelized across all QBs.
RankSeasonQBGamesPass Yds/GPass TD/GINT/GRush Yds/GRush TD/GPasser Rating
12021Kyler Murray14270.51.710.7130.20.36100.6
22020Kyler Murray16248.21.630.7551.20.6994.3
32025Jacoby Brissett14240.41.640.5712.00.0794.1
42024Kyler Murray17226.51.240.6533.60.2993.5
52023Kyler Murray8224.91.250.6330.50.3889.4
62019Kyler Murray16234.51.250.7533.70.2587.7
72016Carson Palmer15282.21.730.932.50.0087.2
82022Kyler Murray11215.31.270.6438.00.2787.2
92017Carson Palmer7282.61.291.001.70.0084.4
102018Josh Rosen14162.70.791.009.90.0066.7

I figured some people might have an issue with just using the rating, so try to incorporate rushing yards as well and use ANY/A as the predominant weight.
.
RankSeasonQBCompositeANY/ARatingTD%INT%Rush value/G
12021Kyler Murray92.36.90100.64.99%2.08%37.4
22020Kyler Murray84.56.4594.34.66%2.15%64.9
32025Jacoby Brissett76.26.0294.14.74%1.65%13.4
42024Kyler Murray73.26.2393.53.88%2.03%39.5
52023Kyler Murray65.65.7989.43.73%1.87%38.0
62016Carson Palmer61.46.0387.24.36%2.35%2.5
72019Kyler Murray59.85.6387.73.71%2.23%38.7
82022Kyler Murray58.05.1687.23.59%1.79%43.5
92017Carson Palmer48.55.8684.43.37%2.62%1.7
102018Josh Rosen1.33.5366.72.80%3.56%9.9

Weighting formula​

Composite score = 0.35 × ANY/A score + 0.25 × Passer Rating score + 0.15 × TD% score + 0.15 × INT% score (inverted) + 0.10 × Rush Value/Game score

Under both methods, the top three stay the same. Kyler's 2021 season is the best, followed by his 2020 season, with Brissett in third place both times.

I know what JB is. It's certainly not the future of this team, but I think it's unfair to write off what happened last year, considering what he had to work with. I thought he played well; many others here think he played well. Under the circumstances, with no good options in the free agent market, I think it's completely reasonable to go with Brissett again and see what he can do with a healthy roster, an upgraded O-line, and a healthy defence.

Now I know there will be three or four people who will want to reply to this with the laughing emoji. Go ahead, but if you do, explain why you disagree and what do you not like about stats.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,073
Reaction score
42,393
Location
Gilbert, AZ
The stats are what they are because we had no running game.

Brissett is what his record says he is. You don’t get extra wins because you completed some passes and scored some TDs once you were down 17.

That’s why his QBR (an actual stat that takes game situations and rushing into account) was 41.2.

It’s much more likely that Brissett’s 2025 counting stats are an outlier than he’s become Geno Smith or something at age 33.

Add in a new offensive regime and you wonder why you should expect any carryover at all.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,694
Reaction score
48,826
Location
UK
The stats are what they are because we had no running game.

Brissett is what his record says he is. You don’t get extra wins because you completed some passes and scored some TDs once you were down 17.

That’s why his QBR (an actual stat that takes game situations and rushing into account) was 41.2.

It’s much more likely that Brissett’s 2025 counting stats are an outlier than he’s become Geno Smith or something at age 33.

Add in a new offensive regime and you wonder why you should expect any carryover at all.

No running game only effects the volume, not the quality. Volume isn't accounted for in passer rating, and is accounted for in TD%, INT%, ANY/A and a bunch of other metrics there, which you can clearly see compare well to other QB's in other seasons.

If anything the no running game makes them more impressive because he was able to do that with defenses knowing we were passing and setting up for it.

Nobody is saying he he Geno Smith. Everyone has been very clear they know what JB is but they don't see a better option.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,694
Reaction score
48,826
Location
UK
Just for fun, here it is with Kirk Cousins last 2 seasons.

RankSeasonQBCompositeANY/ARatingTD%INT%Rush value/G
12021Kyler Murray92.46.90100.64.99%2.08%37.4
22020Kyler Murray84.56.4594.34.66%2.15%64.9
32025Jacoby Brissett76.46.0294.14.74%1.65%13.4
42024Kyler Murray73.36.2393.53.88%2.03%39.5
52023Kyler Murray65.75.7989.43.73%1.87%38.0
62016Carson Palmer61.76.0387.24.36%2.35%2.5
72019Kyler Murray59.95.6387.73.71%2.23%38.7
82022Kyler Murray58.15.1687.23.59%1.79%43.5
92025Kirk Cousins56.35.7384.83.72%1.86%2.7
102024Kirk Cousins51.46.1388.63.97%3.53%0.0
112017Carson Palmer48.85.8684.43.37%2.62%1.7
122018Josh Rosen1.53.5366.72.80%3.56%9.9
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,073
Reaction score
42,393
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Nobody is saying he he Geno Smith. Everyone has been very clear they know what JB is but they don't see a better option.

I’m not clear what you think Brissett is. Because this exercise says you think he’s as good as Kyler Murray at his best. That’s obviously absurd.
 

Lomax to Green 84

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
1,540
Reaction score
1,040
Location
Illinois
I know it’s rare to trade within the division, but I hope Monti has at least kicked the tires on a possible trade for Mack Jones. Maybe offer a 3rd and Brissett. The Niners are going to lose Jones after this year. The Cards 3rd is basically a late 2nd rounder. To me, Jones is a starter who just needed some time. He is big (6’3” and 220 lbs) and throws a very catchable ball. He is also kind of quirky but that is ok. I would much rather give him a chance than reach for a QB in the draft.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,073
Reaction score
42,393
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I know it’s rare to trade within the division, but I hope Monti has at least kicked the tires on a possible trade for Mack Jones. Maybe offer a 3rd and Brissett. The Niners are going to lose Jones after this year. The Cards 3rd is basically a late 2nd rounder. To me, Jones is a starter who just needed some time. He is big (6’3” and 220 lbs) and throws a very catchable ball. He is also kind of quirky but that is ok. I would much rather give him a chance than reach for a QB in the draft.
Reports have been that San Fran is asking for the Sun and the moon for Jones.

If they lose him next year they likely get a 3rd round comp pick for him.

I don’t want to make a long-term investment in Mack Jones.
 

Cardinal88

All Star
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Posts
649
Reaction score
1,116
Location
Phoenix
With over 35 years of accounting/finance history, I have found that we can spin numbers to get the story we want to tell.

That being said, I am all for Brissett being a starter for the simple fact that he at least made the passing game entertaining. As you said, he did this with an OL with 2nd and 3rd team o-linemen (some would argue they are practice guys at best). If we have a balanced attack, he can still sling the ball well enough to help win. To score, you need a good running game and with Conner returning with the addition of Allgiere, we will have plenty of options when we get into the red zone. A key element in being productive.

Again though, our team is not very deep so we have to avoid the injury bug to stay competitive.

I'll add one more thing... I did not like Brissett's decision making towards the end of some games. Not sure why he did some of the things he did like going for a long bomb rather than a first down when it was 4th down. Those decisions need to stop for the Cards to have any hope (unless the guy is wide open and he better not miss him).
 
Top