Ty Simpson declares for the 2026 NFL draft

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,072
Reaction score
42,388
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I look at Brock Purdy and think, if that is what that skill set can produce in the NFL why wouldn't I spend a 2nd round pick trying to get it?

Very similar to Love or Mauigoa at 3. Ideally, you wouldn't spend a 3rd overall pick on a RT or a RB, but sometimes you have to overspend to have a chance to get the productivity you want.

With Simpson, a 2nd rounder might be an overspend, but is probably worth the risk to try and get a QB.
What if we pass on the next BJ Ojulari or Max Melton tho??? HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THE OPPORTUNITY COST??
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,943
Reaction score
3,225
Location
ASFN
It's hilarious to me that you look at a QB who is an old prospect with very few games played, but who people somehow want to take high in the 1st round because of his dad and his dad's influence. Haven't we had enough of the "But his dad will help him" in our QB room? Have we learned no lesson here?

When you have a kid who's one big thing is because of his dad and not, you know, the QB himself, that should be a big red flag, of which he has several.
Nah has nothing to do with his dad. The old argument is pointless when we’re taking about the most important position in football. It’s hard enough to get a good qb can’t be too picky. Good QBs play to their 40’s.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,604
Reaction score
38,573
Location
Orlando, FL
Even as much of a critic I have been on Kyler, I don't think the BIG mistake was taking him 1 overall.
It was Kingsbury’s misconception of Murray’s ability. Not so much that Murray couldn’t have been good, but rather Kingsbury’s assumption Murray didn’t need an OL. Insanity! Kingsbury let Murray get beat up and ruined any chance of his success. I’m not sure Murray could have been great, but with the right team around him he might have been effective.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,072
Reaction score
42,388
Location
Gilbert, AZ
It was Kingsbury’s misconception of Murray’s ability. Not so much that Murray couldn’t have been good, but rather Kingsbury’s assumption Murray didn’t need an OL. Insanity! Kingsbury let Murray get beat up and ruined any chance of his success. I’m not sure Murray could have been great, but with the right team around him he might have been effective.
It’s wild to think Kliff Kingsbury had any personnel control at all during his time here.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,415
Reaction score
33,045
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Nah has nothing to do with his dad. The old argument is pointless when we’re taking about the most important position in football. It’s hard enough to get a good qb can’t be too picky. Good QBs play to their 40’s.
Oh but it does. Folks have raved about the "football culture" he grew up in and how his father's job has helped him learn to be a QB and blah blah blah.

Uh, I would say you absolutely should be picky taking a QB in the 1st round. Taking one just to take one is nuts.
 
OP
OP
Adrian

Adrian

Ronin forever
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
171,338
Reaction score
84,034
Location
Crowley, TX
Square profile picture
Yahoo Sports

@YahooSports
·
3h
Arizona is projected to trade back into Round 1 for Ty Simpson

Is this the right landing spot for the Alabama QB?
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,377
Reaction score
56,255
Location
Colorado
It was Kingsbury’s misconception of Murray’s ability. Not so much that Murray couldn’t have been good, but rather Kingsbury’s assumption Murray didn’t need an OL. Insanity! Kingsbury let Murray get beat up and ruined any chance of his success. I’m not sure Murray could have been great, but with the right team around him he might have been effective.
I disagree with this. Kliff's biggest issue was not coaching Kyler harder in the beginning. He just didn't emphasize the details, wasn't critical, and didn't emphasize the need to be self critical. Not saying he needed to yell at him, but there needed to be more demands and less comfort.

Good QBs protect themselves for the most part so I don't put that on Kliff. It was a quick paced offense which was designed to go fast, be simple and take advantage of mismatches. Kyler was given a good running game.

We will see what Kyler does in Minnesota but IMO it was shared failure in AZ.

The big mistake was the contract extension.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,982
Reaction score
24,703
Location
Modesto, California
I disagree with this. Kliff's biggest issue was not coaching Kyler harder in the beginning. He just didn't emphasize the details, wasn't critical, and didn't emphasize the need to be self critical. Not saying he needed to yell at him, but there needed to be more demands and less comfort.

Good QBs protect themselves for the most part so I don't put that on Kliff. It was a quick paced offense which was designed to go fast, be simple and take advantage of mismatches. Kyler was given a good running game.

We will see what Kyler does in Minnesota but IMO it was shared failure in AZ.

The big mistake was the contract extension.
"Calm the F down"
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,604
Reaction score
38,573
Location
Orlando, FL
I disagree with this. Kliff's biggest issue was not coaching Kyler harder in the beginning. He just didn't emphasize the details, wasn't critical, and didn't emphasize the need to be self critical. Not saying he needed to yell at him, but there needed to be more demands and less comfort.

Good QBs protect themselves for the most part so I don't put that on Kliff. It was a quick paced offense which was designed to go fast, be simple and take advantage of mismatches. Kyler was given a good running game.

We will see what Kyler does in Minnesota but IMO it was shared failure in AZ.

The big mistake was the contract extension.
I agree on not being tough on Murray. I totally disagree on the rest. I characterized Murray’s play as Football PTSD. He literally didn’t know how to protect himself except that little fishhook escape. The playoff wild throw and the more recent grounding penalty for a throw with his back to the line showed how panicked he was. He didn’t enter the league scared; he developed that. Certainly he need much tougher coaching on the mechanics, but bad mechanics didn’t cause him to be intimidated. He’s needed to be confident in a secure pocket, but he rarely had that. Kingsbury wildly overestimated Murray’s escapability skills. The result was Murray was constantly crushed.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,943
Reaction score
3,225
Location
ASFN
Oh but it does. Folks have raved about the "football culture" he grew up in and how his father's job has helped him learn to be a QB and blah blah blah.

Uh, I would say you absolutely should be picky taking a QB in the 1st round. Taking one just to take one is nuts.
I didn’t even know about the dad thing so
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,943
Reaction score
3,225
Location
ASFN
I disagree with this. Kliff's biggest issue was not coaching Kyler harder in the beginning. He just didn't emphasize the details, wasn't critical, and didn't emphasize the need to be self critical. Not saying he needed to yell at him, but there needed to be more demands and less comfort.

Good QBs protect themselves for the most part so I don't put that on Kliff. It was a quick paced offense which was designed to go fast, be simple and take advantage of mismatches. Kyler was given a good running game.

We will see what Kyler does in Minnesota but IMO it was shared failure in AZ.

The big mistake was the contract extension.
Never should have got that contract or any of them(Kiem Kliff). But Kyler stopped using his legs. He was special because of his legs. You don’t draft a short QB that won’t run.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
29,912
Reaction score
41,319
Location
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
yes less but still undersized. You really want 6'3 to 6'7
Dan McGwire
Mike Glennon
Brick Osweiller
Paxton Lynch
Jared Larenzen (RIP)

Say you do not want a 6'7" QB.

There has never been a successful one. In face, if you also count 6'6" QBs to play in NFL, you can find sub 6' QBs who have had same or even more success than them.
 
Top