Thoughts on 2nd Round pick of Campbell

CorporalCardinal

Look! A Cards fan in Iraq
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Posts
907
Reaction score
0
Location
Somewhere in the Desert.....Iraq
He was 280 last I checked, and 280 is much different on a 6-8 frame. He has a slender athletic build IMO. In fact, he looks like a giant LB to me. You are one of the few on here whose opinion I usually trust over mine as far as college guys go though so if you think he fits, I will rethink my position.


And Shogun converts another....hard to argue with him on college players.
 

Doc Cardinal

Old Fart
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Posts
1,807
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
He was 280 last I checked, and 280 is much different on a 6-8 frame. He has a slender athletic build IMO. In fact, he looks like a giant LB to me. You are one of the few on here whose opinion I usually trust over mine as far as college guys go though so if you think he fits, I will rethink my position.

Rethink....rethink....it will make you feel better.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
I really like Connor. He is an all effort all the time tackling machine.

Groves I like as a pass rusher.

Campbell just doesn't fit the D in my eyes. I am not trying to state it as fact, JMHO.

How does a a 6-8 - 290 lb DE, not fit a 3-4 scheme?
 

CorporalCardinal

Look! A Cards fan in Iraq
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Posts
907
Reaction score
0
Location
Somewhere in the Desert.....Iraq
We're going to have to find some linebacker help though if we really want to make the switch to 3-4 as our permanent base D as opposed to the hybrid craziness we've been running...and we still need some more depth on the line.
 
OP
OP
cardsfanmd

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
14,155
Reaction score
4,602
Location
annapolis, md
They are going to 'run over' a guy who is 6'8 and 282lbs? WTH?

The fact that you only think he could be 'serviceable' shows that you haven't even bothered to read up on the guy.
Riddle me this, who is easier to get leverage on, a 5-6 200lb guy or a 6-2 200lb guy.

His weight is spread out over a bigger frame, thus giving him a higher center of gravity, making it easier to get up under him and push back.



Weaknesses: Does not chance directions well, lacks ideal top-end speed and is going to have a harder time turning the corner at the NFL level. Doesn't have elite closing speed and is step slow getting to the quarterback at times. Doesn't always get great hand placement and isn't fast enough to recover in time to get to the quarterback when offensive tackles are able to lock onto him. High-center of gravity makes it difficult to get under offensive linemen's pads and struggles to anchor against double teams. Occasionally gets caught too far upfield and is vulnerable to draws. Appears to wear down late in games and needs to work on endurance.

As a 3-4 lineman it will be his job to regularly take on doubles and not give ground.

The fact that you dont understand this shows you have no place to speak out as to what I know.
 
OP
OP
cardsfanmd

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
14,155
Reaction score
4,602
Location
annapolis, md
We're going to have to find some linebacker help though if we really want to make the switch to 3-4 as our permanent base D as opposed to the hybrid craziness we've been running...and we still need some more depth on the line.
I agree about needing more depth on the line, but we are pretty stacked at LB right now.

LaBoy
Dansby
Hayes
Okeafor
Berry
Haggans
Beisal
Stewart
Holloway?
 

Shogun

Never doubt Mitch. EVER.
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Posts
4,072
Reaction score
1
How does a a 6-8 - 290 lb DE, not fit a 3-4 scheme?
Because that kind of height is detrimental when taking on multiple blockers for 3-4 lineman, especially if they don't have excellent hands. Guys like Ty Warren, Aaron Smith, and Richard Seymour around around "6'4-6'6" and they are thicker. Campbell is taller and will have to work for his a little more. I'm not saying that Campbell is a perfect fit for a 3-4, but because we have a one-gap hybrid system, I think we'll convert better than we initially believe because it should entail that he won't be handling two blockers all the time.

It's a solid pick and I definitely feel that Campbell can contribute. I feel that he just needs to refine his technique and how we'll use him. All in all, he really isn't as much a giant boom/bust as perceived and if the interior does it's job, the Calais pick will definitely pay dividends.
 

CorporalCardinal

Look! A Cards fan in Iraq
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Posts
907
Reaction score
0
Location
Somewhere in the Desert.....Iraq
I agree about needing more depth on the line, but we are pretty stacked at LB right now.

LaBoy
Dansby
Hayes
Okeafor
Berry
Haggans
Beisal
Stewart
Holloway?

I think Berry is probably going to be a better asset down on the line so we could have him, Chike, LaBoy, Hayes, Dansby, Branch/Watson, Smith/Campbell, and Haggans in the front seven.......but with Pendy who the heck knows what he'll run.
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
5,288
Reaction score
3,516
From the same scouting report:

Plays with leverage, doing a nice job of dropping his shoulder and turn the corner

Strong run defender who plays with leverage and good knee bend but, when he gets tall in his stance, he can be ridden off the snap

Has the explosive initial step to defeat combo blocks, when he uses his hands to fend them off and is a disruptive penetrating

Must improve his anchor to neutralize double teams, but is able to stack and hold his ground when he drops his weight and plants his foot into the ground

http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/calais-campbell?id=744

Seems I have every right to speak on what you know, as you don't even bother to read an entire scouting report. Like every other linemen, if they get too high they get ridden out of the play. What a shock.
 
OP
OP
cardsfanmd

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
14,155
Reaction score
4,602
Location
annapolis, md
I think Berry is probably going to be a better asset down on the line so we could have him, Chike, LaBoy, Hayes, Dansby, Branch/Watson, Smith/Campbell, and Haggans in the front seven.......but with Pendy who the heck knows what he'll run.
:thumbup:

:bang:
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
38,148
Reaction score
11,144
Location
Scottsdale
Dockett plays End, he IS the outside threat on the line.


Is DD really a steady/consistent/reliable "outside threat"?? I really don't see him that way at all...
I love Darnell and I like him alot at end, but I really don't believe he is "THE" outside threat at all...
Calais could very well turn out to be that guy as I believe his body & speed are much better suited than that of Dockett... I think Darnell is a more consistent run stopper than he is a QB rusher... And with a more serious threat at end, Darnell will be able to be that much more effective against the run!
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Unless this guy can put on some weight teams will just run over him.
He weighs 283 pounds - that's not exactly "light."

We should be careful not to wed this guy to schemes we've run (or not run) in the past due to the talent we had available at the time.

What I'm guessing is that - despite, our desire for a RB (especially after passing on Mendenhall and F Jones at #16) and the availablity of Ray Rice, Kevin Smith and Jamaal Charles when we picked at #50, the Cards had Campbell rated higher on their board and saw him bringing that 6-8, 283 pounds (with room to grow) and "arms like vines" to the table - and Pendergast probably drooled at the creative ways he can use the kid - thereby adding a dimension to our front seven that he didn't have before.

Knocks on Campbell were: (a) needs to get stronger, (b) must become more consistent and (c) has to overcome bad habits picked up under the new coaching staff at the "U." I believe all three of these deficiencies are fixable.

Kid appears to have a fantastic upside.
 
OP
OP
cardsfanmd

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
14,155
Reaction score
4,602
Location
annapolis, md
From the same scouting report:

Plays with leverage, doing a nice job of dropping his shoulder and turn the corner

Strong run defender who plays with leverage and good knee bend but, when he gets tall in his stance, he can be ridden off the snap

Has the explosive initial step to defeat combo blocks, when he uses his hands to fend them off and is a disruptive penetrating

Must improve his anchor to neutralize double teams, but is able to stack and hold his ground when he drops his weight and plants his foot into the ground

http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/calais-campbell?id=744

Seems I have every right to speak on what you know, as you don't even bother to read an entire scouting report.
You are burying yourself deeper and deeper here.

I assure you I can tell you more about any prospect in this or any recent draft than you could say about your favorite player. I dont need to read the 1/2 page summary on him in this thread because I have been watching him play for the last 3 years (after he was redshirted and played scout team as a true freshman). If you are looking for a dummy go elsewhere.

Do you understand anything about the difference in positions and their requirement in different defensive schemes? Those things that you are so happy about him doing in a 4-3 are not what he will be asked of in our 3-4, and many of those positives can actually be negative in our system. We dont want him to be running around blockers all the time. He will be asked to take them on quite often so that our LBs can make a play on the ball.

I am just going to stop right now because this is pointless.
 
OP
OP
cardsfanmd

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
14,155
Reaction score
4,602
Location
annapolis, md
Is DD really a steady/consistent/reliable "outside threat"?? I really don't see him that way at all...
I love Darnell and I like him alot at end, but I really don't believe he is "THE" outside threat at all...
Calais could very well turn out to be that guy as I believe his body & speed are much better suited than that of Dockett... I think Darnell is a more consistent run stopper than he is a QB rusher... And with a more serious threat at end, Darnell will be able to be that much more effective against the run!
I think the Cards are preparing for the fact that Darnell will likely be gone soon and hopefully this guy will be ready to fill his shoes by then.
 

Brewster10

Registered
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Posts
852
Reaction score
0
My thought:

Pendy and Whiz know alot more about the defense we'll be running than we do..

Therefore, if they deemed Calais one of the Top 30 players on the board (accoring got Graves in his PC).. then I believe they are pretty confident he'll be a good player in the defensive system

Im gonna trust our coach until he gives me reason not to believe..

So Im pleased with Day One
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
I think the Cards are preparing for the fact that Darnell will likely be gone soon and hopefully this guy will be ready to fill his shoes by then.

Another one of your predictions, I see...

Darnell has years to go on his contract... so where exactly is he going?
 

Doc Cardinal

Old Fart
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Posts
1,807
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
I am just going to stop right now because this is pointless.

Ding ding ding.....we have a winner.

-:beer:
 

red desert

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
6,221
Reaction score
0
Location
A.B.Q. in da house
I was hoping the Cards took Conner, however, I had totally forgotten about Cambell so I was very surprised when they took him.

Love the pick. :thumbup:
 

hafey

Registered
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
731
Reaction score
0
Per ESPN's review of the 2nd round pick of Campbell, "This pick gives the Cardinals valuable depth, but we see him as a better player versus the run. "
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
5,288
Reaction score
3,516
You are burying yourself deeper and deeper here.

I assure you I can tell you more about any prospect in this or any recent draft than you could say about your favorite player. I dont need to read the 1/2 page summary on him in this thread because I have been watching him play for the last 3 years (after he was redshirted and played scout team as a true freshman). If you are looking for a dummy go elsewhere.

Do you understand anything about the difference in positions and their requirement in different defensive schemes? Those things that you are so happy about him doing in a 4-3 are not what he will be asked of in our 3-4, and many of those positives can actually be negative in our system. We dont want him to be running around blockers all the time. He will be asked to take them on quite often so that our LBs can make a play on the ball.

I am just going to stop right now because this is pointless.

You certainly rate yourself don't you?

Seeing as you have such an 'in depth' depth knowledge of these players and the Cardinals defensive schemes maybe you drop some knowledge. Do we, or do we not, ask our DE's to penertrate using one gap?

So it seems with my 'limited' knowledge of a players responsibilities, that it is unlikely that they are going to ask Campbell to hold a gap and anchor the LOS much like the Steelers do with their defensive ends. Infact with my limited understanding it seems is quite the opposite. Me thinks that with Campbells initital step and low pad level he will be able to do quite well at getting upfield.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,384
Reaction score
19,213
Location
Chandler, Az
Great pick and great value in the 2nd round.

Provides solid depth at DE. Should push A. Smith as the season goes on.
 
OP
OP
cardsfanmd

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
14,155
Reaction score
4,602
Location
annapolis, md
You certainly rate yourself don't you?

Seeing as you have such an 'in depth' depth knowledge of these players and the Cardinals defensive schemes maybe you drop some knowledge. Do we, or do we not, ask our DE's to penertrate using one gap?

So it seems with my 'limited' knowledge of a players responsibilities, that it is unlikely that they are going to ask Campbell to hold a gap and anchor the LOS much like the Steelers do with their defensive ends. Infact with my limited understanding it seems is quite the opposite. Me thinks that with Campbells initital step and low pad level he will be able to do quite well at shooting gaps.
The man is 6-8!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where do you come up with this??? Low pad level for being a gargantuan doesn't mean low level.

Again, I am not saying the guy sucks, I just didn't see us going after him. Hopefully I am wrong, but regardless I am done wasting my time with this. It has been a long day of chicken wing devouring and beer chugging. Can we just agree to disagree so I can let my brain relax and enjoy this buzz I have been working on?
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,485
Reaction score
21,646
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Going into this season many scouts believed Campbell was going to be a top 10 prospect. A coaching change and bulking up to 290 hurt his play this year. I highly doubt that he simply forgot how to play football.

Our front office and coaching staff has repeatedly said they will be looking for players that fit our scheme. With that in mind I'm feeling quite good about Campbells addition to this team.

I
Here you go Pendy. We are giving you a 6'8" and 280 lb beast who plays with a mean streak. Can you fit him into our system?

Uh , I think yes.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
I think we'll convert better than we initially believe because it should entail that he won't be handling two blockers all the time.

Ding, Ding, Ding.

We dont run your typical 3-4 defense. We ask our 3-4 DE's to attack not take on double teams.
 
Top